• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内部测试草案 科学委员会关于评估和整合流行病学研究证据以供欧洲食品安全局科学评估使用的指南。

Draft for internal testing Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments.

作者信息

More Simon, Bambidis Vasileos, Benford Diane, Bragard Claude, Hernandez-Jerez Antonio, Bennekou Susanne Hougaard, Koutsoumanis Kostas, Machera Kyriaki, Naegeli Hanspeter, Nielsen Soren Saxmose, Schlatter Josef R, Schrenk Dieter, Silano Vittorio, Turck Dominique, Younes Maged, Fletcher Tony, Greiner Matthias, Ntzani Evangelia, Pearce Neil, Vinceti Marco, Ciccolallo Laura, Georgiadis Marios, Gervelmeyer Andrea, Halldorsson Thorhallur I

出版信息

EFSA J. 2020 Aug 18;18(8):e06221. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6221. eCollection 2020 Aug.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6221
PMID:32831946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7433401/
Abstract

EFSA requested its Scientific Committee to prepare a guidance document on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments. The guidance document provides an introduction to epidemiological studies and illustrates the typical biases of the different epidemiological study designs. It describes key epidemiological concepts relevant for evidence appraisal. Regarding study reliability, measures of association, exposure assessment, statistical inferences, systematic error and effect modification are explained. Regarding study relevance, the guidance describes the concept of external validity. The principles of appraising epidemiological studies are illustrated, and an overview of Risk of Bias (RoB) tools is given. A decision tree is developed to assist in the selection of the appropriate Risk of Bias tool, depending on study question, population and design. The customisation of the study appraisal process is explained, detailing the use of RoB tools and assessing the risk of bias in the body of evidence. Several examples of appraising experimental and observational studies using a Risk of Bias tool are annexed to the document to illustrate the application of the approach. This document constitutes a draft that will be applied in EFSA's assessments during a 1-year pilot phase and be revised and complemented as necessary. Before finalisation of the document, a public consultation will be launched.

摘要

欧洲食品安全局要求其科学委员会编写一份关于评估和整合流行病学研究证据以供欧洲食品安全局科学评估使用的指导文件。该指导文件介绍了流行病学研究,并阐述了不同流行病学研究设计的典型偏差。它描述了与证据评估相关的关键流行病学概念。关于研究可靠性,解释了关联度量、暴露评估、统计推断、系统误差和效应修饰。关于研究相关性,该指导文件描述了外部有效性的概念。阐述了评估流行病学研究的原则,并给出了偏倚风险(RoB)工具的概述。开发了一个决策树,以协助根据研究问题、人群和设计选择合适的偏倚风险工具。解释了研究评估过程的定制,详细说明了RoB工具的使用以及评估证据主体中的偏倚风险。该文件附录了几个使用偏倚风险工具评估实验性和观察性研究的例子,以说明该方法的应用。本文件构成一份草案,将在为期1年的试点阶段应用于欧洲食品安全局的评估,并根据需要进行修订和补充。在文件定稿之前,将开展公众咨询。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/fb0f2f502117/EFS2-18-e06221-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/87a6dad656f5/EFS2-18-e06221-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/8f468f24f766/EFS2-18-e06221-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/066448547e2b/EFS2-18-e06221-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/aa3daf235090/EFS2-18-e06221-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/d28d988d1ea9/EFS2-18-e06221-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/5a2f917c8957/EFS2-18-e06221-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/fb0f2f502117/EFS2-18-e06221-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/87a6dad656f5/EFS2-18-e06221-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/8f468f24f766/EFS2-18-e06221-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/066448547e2b/EFS2-18-e06221-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/aa3daf235090/EFS2-18-e06221-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/d28d988d1ea9/EFS2-18-e06221-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/5a2f917c8957/EFS2-18-e06221-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b787/7433401/fb0f2f502117/EFS2-18-e06221-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Draft for internal testing Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments.内部测试草案 科学委员会关于评估和整合流行病学研究证据以供欧洲食品安全局科学评估使用的指南。
EFSA J. 2020 Aug 18;18(8):e06221. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6221. eCollection 2020 Aug.
2
Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments.科学委员会关于评估和整合流行病学研究证据以供欧洲食品安全局科学评估使用的指南。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 5;22(7):e8866. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8866. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Guidance for establishing and applying tolerable upper intake levels for vitamins and essential minerals: Draft for internal testing.维生素和必需矿物质可耐受最高摄入量设定与应用指南:内部测试草案
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 24;20(1):e200102. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.e200102. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments.科学评估中证据权重方法的使用指南。
EFSA J. 2017 Aug 3;15(8):e04971. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4971. eCollection 2017 Aug.
5
The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment.欧洲食品安全局科学评估中不确定性分析指南背后的原则和方法。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05122. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5122. eCollection 2018 Jan.
6
Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments.欧洲食品安全局通用科学评估方案制定指南。
EFSA J. 2023 Oct 30;21(10):e08312. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8312. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments.科学评估中的不确定性分析指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05123. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5123. eCollection 2018 Jan.
9
Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals.关于多种化学品联合暴露对人类健康、动物健康和生态风险评估的统一方法指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Mar 25;17(3):e05634. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5634. eCollection 2019 Mar.
10
Guidance on Communication of Uncertainty in Scientific Assessments.科学评估中不确定性信息传达指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Jan 16;17(1):e05520. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5520. eCollection 2019 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidance for establishing and applying tolerable upper intake levels for vitamins and essential minerals.维生素和必需矿物质可耐受最高摄入量的制定与应用指南。
EFSA J. 2024 Nov 6;22(11):e9052. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9052. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
External Validation of LCR1-LCR2, a Multivariable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Calculator, in a Multiethnic Cohort of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.多变量肝细胞癌风险计算器LCR1-LCR2在慢性乙型肝炎多民族患者队列中的外部验证
Gastro Hep Adv. 2022 May 25;1(4):604-617. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2022.02.008. eCollection 2022.
3
Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin E.

本文引用的文献

1
Update of the spp. host plant database - systematic literature search up to 30 June 2019.spp.寄主植物数据库更新——截至2019年6月30日的系统文献检索。
EFSA J. 2020 Apr 28;18(4):e06114. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6114. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
The 2018 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.2018年欧盟食品中农药残留报告。
EFSA J. 2020 Apr 2;18(4):e06057. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6057. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
The European Union Summary Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2017/2018.
关于维生素E可耐受最高摄入量的科学意见。
EFSA J. 2024 Aug 2;22(8):e8953. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8953. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Scientific Committee guidance on appraising and integrating evidence from epidemiological studies for use in EFSA's scientific assessments.科学委员会关于评估和整合流行病学研究证据以供欧洲食品安全局科学评估使用的指南。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 5;22(7):e8866. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8866. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for iron.关于铁的可耐受最高摄入量的科学意见。
EFSA J. 2024 Jun 12;22(6):e8819. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8819. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for preformed vitamin A and β-carotene.关于预形成维生素A和β-胡萝卜素可耐受最高摄入量的科学意见。
EFSA J. 2024 Jun 6;22(6):e8814. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8814. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
The Need for an Alternative Health Claim Process for Foods Based on Both Nutrient and Contaminant Profiles.基于营养和污染物概况的食品替代健康声称程序的必要性。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Apr 25;8(6):103764. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.103764. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Update of the risk assessment of inorganic arsenic in food.食品中无机砷风险评估的更新
EFSA J. 2024 Jan 18;22(1):e8488. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8488. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for manganese.关于锰的可耐受最高摄入量的科学意见。
EFSA J. 2023 Dec 8;21(12):e8413. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8413. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for folate.关于叶酸可耐受最高摄入量的科学意见。
EFSA J. 2023 Nov 13;21(11):e08353. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8353. eCollection 2023 Nov.
《2017/2018年欧盟关于人畜共患病菌及人类、动物和食物中指示菌的抗菌药物耐药性总结报告》
EFSA J. 2020 Mar 3;18(3):e06007. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6007. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Guidance on commodity risk assessment for the evaluation of high risk plants dossiers.用于评估高风险植物档案的商品风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 29;17(4):e05668. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5668. eCollection 2019 Apr.
5
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
6
The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017.欧盟2017年人畜共患病、人畜共患病原体及食源性疾病暴发的趋势与来源总结报告。
EFSA J. 2018 Dec 12;16(12):e05500. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5500. eCollection 2018 Dec.
7
Risk for animal and human health related to the presence of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in feed and food.饲料和食品中存在二噁英及二噁英类多氯联苯对动物和人类健康的风险。
EFSA J. 2018 Nov 20;16(11):e05333. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5333. eCollection 2018 Nov.
8
Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments.科学评估中证据权重方法的使用指南。
EFSA J. 2017 Aug 3;15(8):e04971. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4971. eCollection 2017 Aug.
9
Guidance on the assessment of the biological relevance of data in scientific assessments.科学评估中数据生物学相关性评估指南。
EFSA J. 2017 Aug 3;15(8):e04970. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4970. eCollection 2017 Aug.
10
Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.更新:基准剂量法在风险评估中的应用。
EFSA J. 2017 Jan 24;15(1):e04658. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4658. eCollection 2017 Jan.