Department of Environment Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 5;17(13):4841. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134841.
Understanding the environmental risks of soil heavy metals (HMs) and identifying their main sources are the essential prerequisites for the prevention and management of soil pollution. Based on a detailed survey of soil HMs (Cu, Cr, Ni, Zn, Pb, Cd, As and Hg) from different land use types (including agricultural land, construction land, wetland, and forest land) in an estuary alluvial island, the environmental risk and source apportionment of soil HMs were investigated. Altogether, 117 soil samples were taken in the study area to appraise the soil HMs environmental risk by using the geo-accumulation index (Igeo), potential ecological risk index (RI), and human health risk assessment (HRA) and to identify its main sources by using positive matrix factorization (PMF) model. The average concentrations of soil HMs (except As) surpassed their reference background values in China. There were no significant differenced in the mean concentrations of HMs in different land use types, except that the Hg concentration in the construction land was significantly higher than that in others. The results of Igeo showed that Cd pollution was unpolluted to moderately polluted, and that the others were unpolluted. The potential ecological risk level for Cd and Hg was "moderated potential risk", while for Cu, Cr, Ni, Zn, Pb and As was "low potential risk". Higher contamination was distributed at the west-central area. The results of the HRA indicated that the non-carcinogenic risk and the carcinogenic risk that human beings suffered from HMs in different land uses were insignificant. To more accurately identify the sources of soil HMs, the PMF model coupled with the GIS-spatial analysis was applied. The results showed that agricultural activities, natural source, industrial discharge and river transportation, and atmosphere deposition were the main determining factors for the accumulation of soil HMs in the study area, with the contribution rate of 24.25%, 23.79%, 23.84%, and 28.12%, respectively. The study provides an underlying insight needed to control of the soil HM pollutions for an estuary alluvial island.
了解土壤重金属(HMs)的环境风险并确定其主要来源是预防和管理土壤污染的必要前提。本研究基于对河口冲积岛不同土地利用类型(包括农田、建设用地、湿地和林地)土壤 HMs(Cu、Cr、Ni、Zn、Pb、Cd、As 和 Hg)的详细调查,探讨了土壤 HMs 的环境风险和来源分配。在研究区域共采集了 117 个土壤样本,采用地积累指数(Igeo)、潜在生态风险指数(RI)和人体健康风险评估(HRA)评价土壤 HMs 的环境风险,并采用正矩阵因子分解(PMF)模型识别其主要来源。除 As 外,土壤 HMs 的平均浓度均超过中国参考背景值。不同土地利用类型土壤 HMs 的平均浓度无显著差异,仅建设用地 Hg 浓度显著高于其他类型。Igeo 结果表明,Cd 污染处于无污染到中度污染,其他均无污染。Cd 和 Hg 的潜在生态风险水平为“中度潜在风险”,而 Cu、Cr、Ni、Zn、Pb 和 As 为“低潜在风险”。较高的污染程度分布在中西部地区。HRA 结果表明,不同土地利用方式下人类受 HMs 的非致癌风险和致癌风险均不显著。为更准确地识别土壤 HMs 的来源,采用 PMF 模型结合 GIS 空间分析。结果表明,农业活动、自然源、工业排放和河流运输以及大气沉积是研究区土壤 HMs 积累的主要决定因素,贡献率分别为 24.25%、23.79%、23.84%和 28.12%。该研究为控制河口冲积岛土壤重金属污染提供了必要的基础。