• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人与机器人的互动中的人类认知:考虑机器人的视角。

Human Cognition in Interaction With Robots: Taking the Robot's Perspective Into Account.

机构信息

9165 RWTH Aachen University, Germany.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2021 Dec;63(8):1396-1407. doi: 10.1177/0018720820933764. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1177/0018720820933764
PMID:32648797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8593285/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated whether and how different human-robot interactions in a physically shared workspace influenced human stimulus-response (SR) relationships.

BACKGROUND

Human work is increasingly performed in interaction with advanced robots. Since human-robot interaction often takes place in physical proximity, it is crucial to investigate the effects of the robot on human cognition.

METHOD

In two experiments, we compared conditions in which humans interacted with a robot that they either remotely controlled or monitored under otherwise comparable conditions in the same shared workspace. The cognitive extent to which the participants took the robot's perspective served as a dependent variable and was evaluated with a SR compatibility task.

RESULTS

The results showed pronounced compatibility effects from the robot's perspective when participants had to take the perspective of the robot during the task, but significantly reduced compatibility effects when human and robot did not interact. In both experiments, compatibility effects from the robot's perspective resulted in statistically significant differences in response times and in error rates between compatible and incompatible conditions.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that SR relationships from the perspective of the robot need to be considered when designing shared workspaces that require users to take the perspective of the robot.

APPLICATION

The results indicate changed compatibility relationships when users share their workplace with an interacting robot and therefore have to take its perspective from time to time. The perspective-dependent processing times are expected to be accompanied by corresponding error rates, which might affect-for instance-safety and efficiency in a production process.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在物理共享工作空间中不同的人机交互方式是否以及如何影响人类的刺激-反应(SR)关系。

背景

人类的工作越来越多地与先进的机器人交互完成。由于人机交互通常发生在物理接近的情况下,因此研究机器人对人类认知的影响至关重要。

方法

在两项实验中,我们比较了人类远程控制机器人或在相同共享工作空间中以其他可比条件监控机器人的条件。参与者从机器人的角度看待问题的认知程度作为一个因变量,并通过一个 SR 兼容性任务进行评估。

结果

结果表明,当参与者在任务中必须从机器人的角度看待问题时,会产生明显的从机器人角度出发的兼容性效应,但当人与机器人不交互时,兼容性效应会显著降低。在两项实验中,从机器人角度出发的兼容性效应导致在兼容和不兼容条件下的反应时间和错误率方面存在统计学上的显著差异。

结论

我们得出结论,当设计需要用户从机器人的角度看待问题的共享工作空间时,需要考虑从机器人角度出发的 SR 关系。

应用

当用户与交互机器人共享工作空间并因此需要不时从其角度看待问题时,结果表明兼容性关系发生了变化。与视角相关的处理时间预计会伴随着相应的错误率,这可能会影响例如生产过程中的安全性和效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f5a/8593285/049d9fbdb43d/10.1177_0018720820933764-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f5a/8593285/117e9b00ddea/10.1177_0018720820933764-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f5a/8593285/b5d3e7a7a52e/10.1177_0018720820933764-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f5a/8593285/ae121ab4ec86/10.1177_0018720820933764-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f5a/8593285/049d9fbdb43d/10.1177_0018720820933764-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f5a/8593285/117e9b00ddea/10.1177_0018720820933764-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f5a/8593285/b5d3e7a7a52e/10.1177_0018720820933764-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f5a/8593285/ae121ab4ec86/10.1177_0018720820933764-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f5a/8593285/049d9fbdb43d/10.1177_0018720820933764-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Human Cognition in Interaction With Robots: Taking the Robot's Perspective Into Account.人与机器人的互动中的人类认知:考虑机器人的视角。
Hum Factors. 2021 Dec;63(8):1396-1407. doi: 10.1177/0018720820933764. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
2
Expectations vs. actual behavior of a social robot: An experimental investigation of the effects of a social robot's interaction skill level and its expected future role on people's evaluations.社交机器人的期望行为与实际行为:一项关于社交机器人的交互技能水平及其预期未来角色对人们评价影响的实验研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0238133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238133. eCollection 2020.
3
Human-like interactions prompt people to take a robot's perspective.类人互动促使人们从机器人的角度看待问题。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 10;14:1190620. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190620. eCollection 2023.
4
Robots with display screens: a robot with a more humanlike face display is perceived to have more mind and a better personality.带显示屏的机器人:具有更类人面部显示的机器人被认为具有更多的思维和更好的个性。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 28;8(8):e72589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072589. eCollection 2013.
5
Improved Mutual Understanding for Human-Robot Collaboration: Combining Human-Aware Motion Planning with Haptic Feedback Devices for Communicating Planned Trajectory.提高人机协作的相互理解:结合具有触觉反馈功能的设备的人体感知运动规划,以传达规划的轨迹。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 25;21(11):3673. doi: 10.3390/s21113673.
6
The Role of Coherent Robot Behavior and Embodiment in Emotion Perception and Recognition During Human-Robot Interaction: Experimental Study.连贯机器人行为与具身性在人机交互中情绪感知与识别中的作用:实验研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jan 26;11:e45494. doi: 10.2196/45494.
7
Persuasive robots should avoid authority: The effects of formal and real authority on persuasion in human-robot interaction.有说服力的机器人应避免权威:正式和真实权威对人机交互中说服的影响。
Sci Robot. 2021 Sep 22;6(58):eabd5186. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abd5186.
8
Spontaneous perspective taking toward robots: The unique impact of humanlike appearance.对机器人的自发视角采择:类人外观的独特影响。
Cognition. 2022 Jul;224:105076. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105076. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
9
Toward understanding social cues and signals in human-robot interaction: effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior.理解人机交互中的社会线索和信号:机器人注视和空间行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 27;4:859. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00859. eCollection 2013.
10
A Study on the Effectiveness of IT Application Education for Older Adults by Interaction Method of Humanoid Robots.《基于仿人机器人交互方法的老年人信息技术应用教育效果研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):10988. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710988.

引用本文的文献

1
Collaborative robots can augment human cognition in regret-sensitive tasks.协作机器人可以在对遗憾敏感的任务中增强人类认知。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jan 17;3(2):pgae016. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae016. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Dynamic three-sided matching model for personnel-robot-position matching problem in intelligent environments.智能环境中人员-机器人-岗位匹配问题的动态三面匹配模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 7;18(4):e0282312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282312. eCollection 2023.
3
Perspective Taking and Avatar-Self Merging.观点采择与阿凡达-自我融合。

本文引用的文献

1
Seeing the world through the eyes of an avatar? Comparing perspective taking and referential coding.透过虚拟形象看世界?比较视角-taking 和指称编码。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Mar;46(3):264-273. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000711.
2
Action effect consistency and body ownership in the avatar-Simon task.化身-Simon 任务中的动作效果一致性和身体所有权。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 9;14(8):e0220817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220817. eCollection 2019.
3
Visual perspective taking for avatars in a Simon task.西蒙任务中虚拟角色的视觉视角采择
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 18;13:714464. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.714464. eCollection 2022.
4
Seeing through the cat's eyes: evidence of a spontaneous perspective taking process using a non-human avatar.透过猫眼看世界:使用非人类化身体验自发采择视角过程的证据
Cogn Process. 2022 May;23(2):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01082-5. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
5
Number to me, space to you: Joint representation of spatial-numerical associations.数字对我,空格对你:空间-数字联合表示。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):485-491. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02013-9. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):158-172. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1573-0.
4
Reversed effect of spatial compatibility when taking avatar's perspective.采用虚拟形象视角时空间兼容性的反向效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jun;72(6):1539-1549. doi: 10.1177/1747021818799240. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
5
When Far Becomes Near.当远方成为近在咫尺。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jan;28(1):69-79. doi: 10.1177/0956797616672464. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
6
A Tale of Two Types of Perspective Taking: Sex Differences in Spatial Ability.两种视角的故事:空间能力的性别差异。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Nov;27(11):1507-1516. doi: 10.1177/0956797616667459. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
7
Human-Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges.人机交互:现状与挑战。
Hum Factors. 2016 Jun;58(4):525-32. doi: 10.1177/0018720816644364. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
8
Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention.西蒙任务中的性别差异有助于解释选择性注意中的性别差异。
Psychol Res. 2017 May;81(3):571-581. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0763-4. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
9
When do humans spontaneously adopt another's visuospatial perspective?人类何时会自发地采用他人的视觉空间视角?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Mar;42(3):401-12. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000153. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
10
Analyzing the effects of human-aware motion planning on close-proximity human-robot collaboration.分析人类感知运动规划对近距离人机协作的影响。
Hum Factors. 2015 Feb;57(1):21-33. doi: 10.1177/0018720814565188.