• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者、非专业照护者和普通人群幸福感水平差异的探索性分析。

An explorative analysis of the differences in levels of happiness between cancer patients, informal caregivers and the general population.

机构信息

Clinical Hospital of the Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Health-Related Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Learning and Research Institute, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jul 11;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00594-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-020-00594-1
PMID:32652992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7354680/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although cancer patients experience distressing symptoms and health-related changes in their quality of life, they may report positive emotional states. The lives of informal caregivers of cancer patients may also be affected by the patient's cancer diagnosis; however, they may also find benefits in their experiences. Noticeable changes are reported in personal priorities after an oncologic diagnosis that can lead individuals to restructure their values and the way they perceive life. This study aims to assess happiness/satisfaction with life and positive and negative affect in cancer patients and informal caregivers compared with healthy people in the general population.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study with participants recruited online in five regions of Brazil through the social network site Facebook® and the application WhatsApp®. Surveys were completed using the SurveyMonkey® platform. A different sample of cancer patients and informal caregivers that was personally interviewed with the same forms was also grouped in the present analysis. Variables with p-values < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were included in linear regression models (stepwise, backward).

RESULTS

A total of 2580 participants were included, of whom 2112 were healthy representatives of the general population, 342 were cancer patients, and 126 were informal caregivers of cancer patients. In the multivariate analysis, the cancer patients and informal caregivers were happier than the healthy people in the general population, even after controlling for age, sex, educational level, and income. The patients and caregivers had lower scores for positive affect and higher scores for negative affect.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the conditions related to happiness, satisfaction with life and positive affect are similar for all groups. However, cancer patients and informal caregivers report increased rates of happiness and satisfaction with life compared with theoretically healthy people, although they have lower positive affect scores and higher negative affect scores. It is suggested that cancer patients and caregivers of cancer patients experience more difficulties (suffering) on ​​a daily basis. However, given the increased difficulties, they perceive life differently, reporting that they are happier.

摘要

背景

尽管癌症患者在生活质量方面经历着痛苦的症状和与健康相关的变化,但他们可能会报告积极的情绪状态。癌症患者的非专业照护者的生活也可能受到患者癌症诊断的影响;然而,他们也可能在其经历中找到益处。在接受肿瘤学诊断后,人们会报告个人优先事项发生显著变化,这可能导致个体重构其价值观和对生活的看法。本研究旨在评估癌症患者和非专业照护者与普通人群中的健康人相比,其生活幸福感/满意度以及正性和负性情绪的差异。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,通过 Facebook®和 WhatsApp®社交网站招募巴西五个地区的在线参与者,并使用 SurveyMonkey®平台完成问卷调查。在单变量分析中 p 值 < 0.05 的变量被纳入线性回归模型(逐步,向后)。

结果

共纳入 2580 名参与者,其中 2112 名为普通人群的健康代表,342 名为癌症患者,126 名为癌症患者的非专业照护者。在多变量分析中,即使在控制了年龄、性别、教育水平和收入后,癌症患者和非专业照护者也比普通人群中的健康人更幸福。患者和照护者的正性情绪评分较低,而负性情绪评分较高。

结论

总体而言,与幸福感、生活满意度和正性情绪相关的条件在所有组中相似。然而,癌症患者和癌症患者的非专业照护者报告的幸福感和生活满意度高于理论上的健康人,尽管他们的正性情绪评分较低,负性情绪评分较高。这表明癌症患者和癌症患者的非专业照护者每天都面临更多的困难(痛苦)。然而,考虑到增加的困难,他们对生活有不同的看法,报告说他们更快乐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7354680/b249cb84afd2/12904_2020_594_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7354680/b249cb84afd2/12904_2020_594_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e96/7354680/b249cb84afd2/12904_2020_594_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An explorative analysis of the differences in levels of happiness between cancer patients, informal caregivers and the general population.癌症患者、非专业照护者和普通人群幸福感水平差异的探索性分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jul 11;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00594-1.
2
What Is Missing for You to Be Happy? Comparison of the Pursuit of Happiness Among Cancer Patients, Informal Caregivers, and Healthy Individuals.你缺少什么才能幸福?癌症患者、非专业照护者和健康个体对幸福的追求比较。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Sep;58(3):417-426.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
3
Predictors of happiness and satisfaction with life in individuals from the Brazilian general population who use social networks: a cross-sectional study.巴西一般人群中使用社交网络的个体的幸福感和生活满意度的预测因素:一项横断面研究。
Cad Saude Publica. 2021 Dec 10;37(12):e00164020. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00164020. eCollection 2021.
4
Caregiver experience, health-related quality of life and life satisfaction among informal caregivers to patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A cross-sectional study.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的非正式照料者的照料者体验、健康相关生活质量和生活满意度:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Dec;27(23-24):4321-4330. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14593. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
5
Well-being loss in informal care for the elderly people: Empirical study from China national baseline CHARLS.老年人非正式照护的福利损失:来自中国国家 CHARLS 基线的实证研究。
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;11(2):e12336. doi: 10.1111/appy.12336. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Are informal caregivers less happy than noncaregivers? Happiness and the intensity of caregiving in combination with paid and voluntary work.非正式照料者是否比非照料者更不幸福?幸福与照料强度以及有偿工作和志愿工作的关系。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Mar;27(1):44-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00998.x. Epub 2012 May 10.
7
Care-Related Quality of Life of Informal Caregivers After Geriatric Rehabilitation.老年康复后非专业照护者的照护相关生活质量。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):259-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
Predictors of the personal benefits and positive aspects of informal caregiving.非正式照护的个人获益和积极方面的预测因素。
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Nov;23(11):1533-1538. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1501662. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
9
Well-being in informal caregivers of survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征幸存者的非正式照料者的健康状况
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):81-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000190428.71765.31.
10
Wellbeing perception of institutional caregivers working for people with disabilities: use of Subjective Happiness Scale and Satisfaction with Life Scale analyses.残疾人士机构护理人员的幸福感感知:使用主观幸福感量表和生活满意度量表进行分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Sep-Oct;31(5):1083-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Subjective Happiness Scale, Oxford Happiness Questionnaire and Pemberton Happiness Index among women with breast cancer in a multi-ethnic Asian setting.在多民族亚洲环境中对乳腺癌女性进行主观幸福感量表、牛津幸福感问卷和彭伯顿幸福感指数的验证。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2025 Mar 13;19:1873. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1873. eCollection 2025.
2
Patterns and influencing factors of savoring in caregivers of advanced cancer patients: a latent profile study.晚期癌症患者照料者的品味模式及影响因素:一项潜在剖面分析研究
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 25;13(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02526-1.
3
Understanding experiences of cancer-related fatigue in patients with lung cancer after their cancer treatment: a qualitative content analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the equivalence of Web-based and paper-and-pencil questionnaires using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis: a case of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ).使用基于网络的和纸质问卷的等效性评估,采用不同项目和测试功能(DIF 和 DTF)分析:以四维度症状问卷(4DSQ)为例。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1191-1200. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1816-5. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
2
Internal resources among informal caregivers: trajectories and associations with well-being.非正式照料者的内部资源:轨迹及其与幸福感的关联
Qual Life Res. 2017 Dec;26(12):3239-3250. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1647-9. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
了解肺癌患者癌症治疗后与癌症相关疲劳的经历:一项质性内容分析。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Apr;33(4):975-987. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03578-9. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
4
Supporting Return to Work after Breast Cancer: A Mixed Method Study.支持乳腺癌患者重返工作岗位:一项混合方法研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 19;11(16):2343. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162343.
5
On the beauty of sadness: it's okay to say, I am sad, thank you.论悲伤之美:说一句“我很悲伤,谢谢”,也无妨。
Commun Integr Biol. 2023 May 12;16(1):2211424. doi: 10.1080/19420889.2023.2211424. eCollection 2023.
6
Religiosity, Emotions and Health: The Role of Trust/Mistrust in God in People Affected by Cancer.宗教信仰、情感与健康:信任/不信任上帝在癌症患者中的作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 18;10(6):1138. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061138.
7
Exploring healthcare professionals' experiences with informal family cancer caregiving.探索医疗保健专业人员在非正式家庭癌症护理方面的经验。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7745-7754. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07207-y. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
8
Understanding and Supporting Informal Cancer Caregivers.理解和支持非正式癌症护理者。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):494-513. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00955-3. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
9
WhatsApp Messenger use in oncology: a narrative review on pros and contras of a flexible and practical, non-specific communication tool.肿瘤学中WhatsApp即时通讯软件的应用:对一种灵活实用的非特定通信工具的利弊的叙述性综述
Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 Dec 13;15:1334. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1334. eCollection 2021.
10
Working cancer survivors' physical and mental characteristics compared to cancer-free workers in Japan: a nationwide general population-based study.工作癌症幸存者的身体和心理特征与日本无癌症工人的比较:一项全国性的基于一般人群的研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Dec;15(6):912-921. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00984-7. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
Quality of life and living with cancer: findings from the European social survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.
癌症患者的生活质量与生活状况:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康社会决定因素特别模块的研究结果
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):115-119. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw226.
4
Who are happy survivors? Physical, psychosocial, and spiritual factors associated with happiness of breast cancer survivors during the transition from cancer patient to survivor.哪些是快乐的幸存者?与乳腺癌患者向幸存者过渡期间的幸福感相关的生理、心理社会和精神因素。
Psychooncology. 2017 Nov;26(11):1922-1928. doi: 10.1002/pon.4408. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
5
The Pemberton Happiness Index: Validation of the Universal Portuguese version in a large Brazilian sample.彭伯顿幸福指数:通用葡萄牙语版本在巴西大样本中的验证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(38):e4915. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004915.
6
Burden and happiness in head and neck cancer carers: the role of supportive care needs.头颈癌患者照料者的负担与幸福感:支持性护理需求的作用
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Oct;24(10):4283-91. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3261-8. Epub 2016 May 16.
7
The effects of age on health-related quality of life in cancer populations: A pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 involving 6024 cancer patients.年龄对癌症患者健康相关生活质量的影响:使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C30 对涉及 6024 名癌症患者的 6024 名癌症患者进行的随机对照试验的汇总分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Dec;51(18):2808-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.08.027. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
8
Genetics of wellbeing and its components satisfaction with life, happiness, and quality of life: a review and meta-analysis of heritability studies.幸福及其组成部分(生活满意度、幸福感和生活质量)的遗传学:遗传性研究的综述与荟萃分析
Behav Genet. 2015 Mar;45(2):137-56. doi: 10.1007/s10519-015-9713-y. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
9
When do we need to care about the caregiver? Supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors.我们何时需要关注照顾者?癌症患者和癌症幸存者的非正式照顾者的支持性护理需求、焦虑和抑郁。
Cancer. 2015 May 1;121(9):1513-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29223. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
10
Correlates of post-traumatic stress symptoms and growth in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症患者创伤后应激症状与成长的相关因素:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Psychooncology. 2015 Jun;24(6):624-34. doi: 10.1002/pon.3719. Epub 2014 Nov 12.