• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用推荐方法进行冬小麦育种中的基因组选择。

Genomic Selection in Winter Wheat Breeding Using a Recommender Approach.

机构信息

Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.

Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2020 Jul 11;11(7):779. doi: 10.3390/genes11070779.

DOI:10.3390/genes11070779
PMID:32664601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7397162/
Abstract

Achieving optimal predictive ability is key to increasing the relevance of implementing genomic selection (GS) approaches in plant breeding programs. The potential of an item-based collaborative filtering (IBCF) recommender system in the context of multi-trait, multi-environment GS has been explored. Different GS scenarios for IBCF were evaluated for a diverse population of winter wheat lines adapted to the Pacific Northwest region of the US. Predictions across years through cross-validations resulted in improved predictive ability when there is a high correlation between environments. Using multiple spectral traits collected from high-throughput phenotyping resulted in better GS accuracies for grain yield (GY) compared to using only single traits for predictions. Trait adjustments through various Bayesian regression models using genomic information from SNP markers was the most effective in achieving improved accuracies for GY, heading date, and plant height among the GS scenarios evaluated. Bayesian LASSO had the highest predictive ability compared to other models for phenotypic trait adjustments. IBCF gave competitive accuracies compared to a genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP) model for predicting different traits. Overall, an IBCF approach could be used as an alternative to traditional prediction models for important target traits in wheat breeding programs.

摘要

实现最佳预测能力是提高基因组选择(GS)方法在植物育种计划中相关性的关键。本文探讨了基于项目的协同过滤(IBCF)推荐系统在多性状、多环境 GS 背景下的潜力。针对适应美国太平洋西北地区的冬小麦群体,评估了不同的 IBCF GS 场景。通过交叉验证进行跨年度预测,当环境之间存在高度相关性时,预测能力会得到提高。与仅使用单一性状进行预测相比,使用来自高通量表型的多个光谱性状可提高产量(GY)的 GS 准确性。通过使用 SNP 标记的基因组信息进行各种贝叶斯回归模型进行性状调整,是在评估的 GS 场景中提高 GY、抽穗期和株高准确性的最有效方法。与其他模型相比,贝叶斯 LASSO 用于表型性状调整的预测能力最高。与基因组最佳线性无偏预测(GBLUP)模型相比,IBCF 在预测不同性状方面具有竞争力。总体而言,IBCF 方法可以作为小麦育种计划中重要目标性状的传统预测模型的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Genomic Selection in Winter Wheat Breeding Using a Recommender Approach.利用推荐方法进行冬小麦育种中的基因组选择。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Jul 11;11(7):779. doi: 10.3390/genes11070779.
2
Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction of Yield-Related Traits in US Soft Wheat under Variable Water Regimes.在不同水分条件下美国软小麦产量相关性状的多性状基因组预测。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Oct 28;11(11):1270. doi: 10.3390/genes11111270.
3
Canopy Temperature and Vegetation Indices from High-Throughput Phenotyping Improve Accuracy of Pedigree and Genomic Selection for Grain Yield in Wheat.高通量表型分析得出的冠层温度和植被指数提高了小麦籽粒产量系谱选择和基因组选择的准确性。
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Sep 8;6(9):2799-808. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.032888.
4
Accuracy of genomic selection for grain yield and agronomic traits in soft red winter wheat.基因组选择对软红冬小麦粒产量和农艺性状的准确性。
BMC Genet. 2019 Nov 1;20(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12863-019-0785-1.
5
Gains through selection for grain yield in a winter wheat breeding program.在冬小麦育种计划中,通过选择获得的谷物产量增益。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0221603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221603. eCollection 2020.
6
Genomic Prediction for Grain Yield and Yield-Related Traits in Chinese Winter Wheat.中国冬小麦产量及产量相关性状的基因组预测。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 17;21(4):1342. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041342.
7
Genomic prediction and GWAS of yield, quality and disease-related traits in spring barley and winter wheat.春大麦和冬小麦产量、品质和与疾病相关性状的基因组预测和 GWAS。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 25;10(1):3347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60203-2.
8
Integrating genomic-enabled prediction and high-throughput phenotyping in breeding for climate-resilient bread wheat.将基因组增强预测与高通量表型分析整合到抗逆性面包小麦的育种中。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Jan;132(1):177-194. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3206-3. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
9
Prediction of Multiple-Trait and Multiple-Environment Genomic Data Using Recommender Systems.使用推荐系统预测多性状和多环境基因组数据
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Jan 4;8(1):131-147. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300309.
10
Evaluation of genomic selection methods for predicting fiber quality traits in Upland cotton.评估基因组选择方法在陆地棉纤维品质性状预测中的应用。
Mol Genet Genomics. 2020 Jan;295(1):67-79. doi: 10.1007/s00438-019-01599-z. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of biomass accumulation and tolerance of wheat seedlings to drought and elevated temperatures using hyperspectral imaging.利用高光谱成像预测小麦幼苗的生物量积累以及对干旱和高温的耐受性
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Feb 2;15:1344826. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1344826. eCollection 2024.
2
Impacts of salinity stress on crop plants: improving salt tolerance through genetic and molecular dissection.盐胁迫对农作物的影响:通过遗传和分子剖析提高耐盐性
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Sep 15;14:1241736. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1241736. eCollection 2023.
3
Breeding Bread-Making Wheat Varieties for Organic Farming Systems: The Need to Target Productivity, Robustness, Resource Use Efficiency and Grain Quality Traits.

本文引用的文献

1
Incorporating Genome-Wide Association Mapping Results Into Genomic Prediction Models for Grain Yield and Yield Stability in CIMMYT Spring Bread Wheat.将全基因组关联图谱结果整合到国际玉米小麦改良中心春性面包小麦产量和产量稳定性的基因组预测模型中。
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Mar 4;11:197. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00197. eCollection 2020.
2
Genomic Prediction for Grain Yield and Yield-Related Traits in Chinese Winter Wheat.中国冬小麦产量及产量相关性状的基因组预测。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 17;21(4):1342. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041342.
3
Genomic Prediction and Indirect Selection for Grain Yield in US Pacific Northwest Winter Wheat Using Spectral Reflectance Indices from High-Throughput Phenotyping.
为有机耕作系统培育面包制作小麦品种:针对生产力、稳健性、资源利用效率和谷物品质性状的必要性。
Foods. 2023 Mar 13;12(6):1209. doi: 10.3390/foods12061209.
4
Genomic Prediction Strategies for Dry-Down-Related Traits in Maize.玉米与干燥相关性状的基因组预测策略
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 30;13:930429. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.930429. eCollection 2022.
5
Genomic Selection: A Tool for Accelerating the Efficiency of Molecular Breeding for Development of Climate-Resilient Crops.基因组选择:加速培育抗逆作物分子育种效率的工具。
Front Genet. 2022 Feb 9;13:832153. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.832153. eCollection 2022.
利用高通量表型的光谱反射指数对美国太平洋西北地区冬小麦的产量进行基因组预测和间接选择。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Dec 25;21(1):165. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010165.
4
Genetic Dissection of Snow Mold Tolerance in US Pacific Northwest Winter Wheat Through Genome-Wide Association Study and Genomic Selection.通过全基因组关联研究和基因组选择对美国太平洋西北部冬小麦耐雪腐病性进行遗传剖析
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Oct 29;10:1337. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01337. eCollection 2019.
5
Accuracy of genomic selection for grain yield and agronomic traits in soft red winter wheat.基因组选择对软红冬小麦粒产量和农艺性状的准确性。
BMC Genet. 2019 Nov 1;20(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12863-019-0785-1.
6
Tractable Bayesian variable selection: beyond normality.可处理的贝叶斯变量选择:超越正态性
J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(524):1742-1758. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1371025. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
7
Evaluation of GBLUP, BayesB and elastic net for genomic prediction in Chinese Simmental beef cattle.GBLUP、BayesB 和弹性网络在西门塔尔牛肉用牛基因组预测中的评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0210442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210442. eCollection 2019.
8
Training population selection and use of fixed effects to optimize genomic predictions in a historical USA winter wheat panel.训练群体选择和固定效应的使用,以优化美国历史冬小麦面板的基因组预测。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Apr;132(4):1247-1261. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03276-6. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
9
Prospects and Challenges of Applied Genomic Selection-A New Paradigm in Breeding for Grain Yield in Bread Wheat.应用基因组选择在面包小麦产量育种中的前景与挑战——一种新的模式。
Plant Genome. 2018 Nov;11(3). doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2018.03.0017.
10
An R Package for Multitrait and Multienvironment Data with the Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Algorithm.一个基于项目的协同过滤算法的多性状和多环境数据的 R 包。
Plant Genome. 2018 Nov;11(3). doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2018.02.0013.