Maciuszek Józef, Polczyk Romuald, Tucholska Kinga
Institute of Applied Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland1.
Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland2.
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2019 Jun 30;15(2):133-142. doi: 10.5709/acp-0263-0. eCollection 2019.
This study concerned the relationships among personal values (conformity, tradition, benevolence, universality, self-direction, stimulation, hedonism, achievement, power, safety), time perspectives by Zimbardo (past negative, past positive, present hedonistic, present fatalistic, future) and life satisfaction. The main hypothesis stated that value priorities would predict life satisfaction both directly and indirectly through time perspectives. 237 Polish students (120 females) took part in the study. Path analysis demonstrated that life satisfaction was directly and positively predicted by the value of benevolence, and indirectly and negatively by conformity and tradition via the past negative time perspective. Life satisfaction was also indirectly predicted by the values of hedonism and security via the future time perspective - Hedonism was a negative, and security a positive predictor of future time perspective, and the future time perspective was a positive predictor of life satisfaction. The significance of these results for mechanisms and predictors of life satisfaction is discussed.
本研究关注个人价值观(从众、传统、 benevolence、普遍性、自我导向、刺激、享乐主义、成就、权力、安全)、津巴多的时间观(过去消极、过去积极、当前享乐主义、当前宿命论、未来)与生活满意度之间的关系。主要假设表明,价值观优先级将直接和间接地通过时间观预测生活满意度。237名波兰学生(120名女性)参与了该研究。路径分析表明,生活满意度直接且正向地由 benevolence价值观预测,通过过去消极时间观由从众和传统间接且负向地预测。生活满意度还通过未来时间观由享乐主义和安全价值观间接预测——享乐主义是未来时间观的负向预测因素,安全是正向预测因素,而未来时间观是生活满意度的正向预测因素。讨论了这些结果对生活满意度机制和预测因素的意义。