Böttcher Benjamin, Beller Ebba, Busse Anke, Cantré Daniel, Yücel Seyrani, Öner Alper, Ince Hüseyin, Weber Marc-André, Meinel Felix G
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Paediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine, Divison of Cardiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Nov;36(11):2239-2247. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01935-0. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
To investigate the performance of a deep learning-based algorithm for fully automated quantification of left ventricular (LV) volumes and function in cardiac MRI. We retrospectively analysed MR examinations of 50 patients (74% men, median age 57 years). The most common indications were known or suspected ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathies or myocarditis. Fully automated analysis of LV volumes and function was performed using a deep learning-based algorithm. The analysis was subsequently corrected by a senior cardiovascular radiologist. Manual volumetric analysis was performed by two radiology trainees. Volumetric results were compared using Bland-Altman statistics and intra-class correlation coefficient. The frequency of clinically relevant differences was analysed using re-classification rates. The fully automated volumetric analysis was completed in a median of 8 s. With expert review and corrections, the analysis required a median of 110 s. Median time required for manual analysis was 3.5 min for a cardiovascular imaging fellow and 9 min for a radiology resident (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). The correlation between fully automated results and expert-corrected results was very strong with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.998 for end-diastolic volume, 0.997 for end-systolic volume, 0.899 for stroke volume, 0.972 for ejection fraction and 0.991 for myocardial mass (all p < 0.001). Clinically meaningful differences between fully automated and expert corrected results occurred in 18% of cases, comparable to the rate between the two manual readers (20%). Deep learning-based fully automated analysis of LV volumes and function is feasible, time-efficient and highly accurate. Clinically relevant corrections are required in a minority of cases.
为研究基于深度学习的算法在心脏磁共振成像中对左心室(LV)容积和功能进行全自动定量分析的性能。我们回顾性分析了50例患者的磁共振检查(74%为男性,中位年龄57岁)。最常见的指征是已知或疑似缺血性心脏病、心肌病或心肌炎。使用基于深度学习的算法对LV容积和功能进行全自动分析。随后由一位资深心血管放射科医生对分析结果进行校正。两名放射科实习生进行手动容积分析。使用布兰德-奥特曼统计法和组内相关系数比较容积结果。使用重新分类率分析临床相关差异的频率。全自动容积分析的中位时间为8秒。经过专家审核和校正后,分析中位时间为110秒。心血管影像专科住院医师进行手动分析的中位时间为3.5分钟,放射科住院医师为9分钟(所有比较的p<0.0001)。全自动结果与专家校正结果之间的相关性非常强,舒张末期容积的组内相关系数为0.998,收缩末期容积为0.997,每搏输出量为0.899,射血分数为0.972,心肌质量为0.991(所有p<0.001)。全自动结果与专家校正结果之间具有临床意义的差异发生在18%的病例中,与两名手动阅片者之间的差异率(20%)相当。基于深度学习的LV容积和功能全自动分析是可行的、高效省时的且高度准确的。少数病例需要进行临床相关校正。