Suppr超能文献

通过小鼠追踪探索信号辨别任务和停止信号任务中的运动抑制过程。

Mouse Tracking to Explore Motor Inhibition Processes in Go/No-Go and Stop Signal Tasks.

作者信息

Benedetti Viola, Gavazzi Gioele, Giovannelli Fabio, Bravi Riccardo, Giganti Fiorenza, Minciacchi Diego, Mascalchi Mario, Cincotta Massimo, Viggiano Maria Pia

机构信息

Section of Psychology-Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child's Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, 50135 Florence, Italy.

IRCCS SDN, 80142 Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):464. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10070464.

Abstract

Response inhibition relies on both proactive and reactive mechanisms that exert a synergic control on goal-directed actions. It is typically evaluated by the go/no-go (GNG) and the stop signal task (SST) with response recording based on the key-press method. However, the analysis of discrete variables (i.e., present or absent responses) registered by key-press could be insufficient to capture dynamic aspects of inhibitory control. Trying to overcome this limitation, in the present study we used a mouse tracking procedure to characterize movement profiles related to proactive and reactive inhibition. A total of fifty-three participants performed a cued GNG and an SST. The cued GNG mainly involves proactive control whereas the reactive component is mainly engaged in the SST. We evaluated the velocity profile from mouse trajectories both for responses obtained in the Go conditions and for inhibitory failures. Movements were classified as one-shot when no corrections were observed. Multi-peaked velocity profiles were classified as non-one-shot. A higher proportion of one-shot movements was found in the SST compared to the cued GNG when subjects failed to inhibit responses. This result suggests that proactive control may be responsible for unsmooth profiles in inhibition failures, supporting a differentiation between these tasks.

摘要

反应抑制依赖于主动和反应机制,这些机制对目标导向行为施加协同控制。它通常通过按键法记录反应的“停止信号任务”(SST)和“选择反应任务”(GNG)来评估。然而,对按键记录的离散变量(即反应出现或未出现)的分析可能不足以捕捉抑制控制的动态方面。为了克服这一局限性,在本研究中,我们使用了小鼠追踪程序来表征与主动和反应抑制相关的运动特征。共有53名参与者进行了线索化GNG和SST。线索化GNG主要涉及主动控制,而反应成分主要参与SST。我们评估了在“执行”条件下获得的反应以及抑制失败时小鼠轨迹的速度特征。当未观察到校正时,运动被分类为一次性运动。多峰速度特征被分类为非一次性运动。当受试者未能抑制反应时,与线索化GNG相比,在SST中发现一次性运动的比例更高。这一结果表明,主动控制可能是抑制失败时不平稳特征的原因,支持了这些任务之间的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d969/7408439/e36dec50c9c4/brainsci-10-00464-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验