• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谷歌搜索偏头痛:一项关于谷歌作为偏头痛管理信息资源的研究。

Googling migraine: A study of Google as an information resource of migraine management.

机构信息

Danish Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.

Danish Headache Knowledge Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2020 Dec;40(14):1633-1644. doi: 10.1177/0333102420942241. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1177/0333102420942241
PMID:32703015
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Health information is one of the most frequently searched topics on the internet. In this observational cross-sectional study, we evaluated the content of the highest indexed Google search results related to migraine management.

METHODS

We identified the five most used search terms related to migraine management via Google Trends in the time period 1 January 2004 to 2 October 2019. We entered each search term into Google's search engine and retrieved the search results from the first three pages from each search query. We stratified the recommended treatment options and evaluated the websites using the DISCERN tool.

RESULTS

In total, 73 unique websites recommended a total of 77 different migraine treatment options, consisting of 35 (45%) acute and 42 (55%) preventive treatments. For acute treatments, pharmacological options were more frequently recommended (88% of websites), whereas non-pharmacological options were more frequent among preventive treatments (67%). Evaluation of the consumer health information using the DISCERN tool showed that non-governmental organizations had the highest mean total score with 3.8 (±0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Googling when looking for migraine treatments reveals a multitude of management proposals of varying quality. Non-governmental organizations provide the overall highest quality of written consumer health information on migraine treatments among search results. We encourage stakeholders to optimize and distribute high-quality and peer-reviewed information on migraine management.

摘要

简介

健康信息是互联网上搜索频率最高的话题之一。在这项观察性横断面研究中,我们评估了与偏头痛管理相关的谷歌搜索结果中索引最高的内容。

方法

我们通过谷歌趋势(Google Trends)确定了 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 10 月 2 日期间与偏头痛管理最相关的五个常用搜索词。我们将每个搜索词输入谷歌搜索引擎,并从每个搜索查询的前三页中检索搜索结果。我们对推荐的治疗方案进行分层,并使用 DISCERN 工具评估网站。

结果

共有 73 个独特的网站总共推荐了 77 种不同的偏头痛治疗方案,其中 35 种(45%)为急性治疗方案,42 种(55%)为预防治疗方案。对于急性治疗方案,药物治疗方案更频繁地被推荐(88%的网站),而非药物治疗方案在预防治疗方案中更为常见(67%)。使用 DISCERN 工具评估消费者健康信息,发现非政府组织的平均总分最高,为 3.8(±0.19)。

结论

在寻找偏头痛治疗方法时谷歌搜索会显示出许多不同质量的管理建议。在搜索结果中,非政府组织提供的关于偏头痛治疗的消费者健康信息整体质量最高。我们鼓励利益相关者优化和分发偏头痛管理方面的高质量和同行评审信息。

相似文献

1
Googling migraine: A study of Google as an information resource of migraine management.谷歌搜索偏头痛:一项关于谷歌作为偏头痛管理信息资源的研究。
Cephalalgia. 2020 Dec;40(14):1633-1644. doi: 10.1177/0333102420942241. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
2
Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites.通过对患者信息网站进行客观评分增强颅缝早闭患儿家长的能力。
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Jun;27(4):874-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002623.
3
Googling caesarean section: a survey on the quality of the information available on the Internet.在谷歌上搜索剖腹产:关于互联网上可得信息质量的一项调查。
BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):731-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13081. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
4
A method for the design and development of medical or health care information websites to optimize search engine results page rankings on Google.一种设计和开发医疗或保健信息网站以优化谷歌搜索引擎结果页面排名的方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 27;15(8):e183. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2632.
5
Using Search Engines to Investigate Shared Migraine Experiences.使用搜索引擎调查偏头痛的共同经历。
Headache. 2017 Sep;57(8):1217-1227. doi: 10.1111/head.13130. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
The quality of information on the Internet on orthodontic retainer wear: a cross-sectional study.互联网上关于正畸保持器佩戴的信息质量:一项横断面研究。
J Orthod. 2016 Mar;43(1):47-58. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2015.1114711. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Assessing the Quality of Online Health Information and Trend Data for Colorectal Malignancies.评估结直肠癌在线健康信息和趋势数据的质量。
J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:923-928. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.055. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
8
Quality Evaluation of Consumer Health Information Websites Found on Google Using DISCERN, CRAAP, and HONcode.利用 DISCERN、CRAAP 和 HONcode 对谷歌上找到的消费者健康信息网站进行质量评估。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2021 Oct-Dec;40(4):396-407. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2021.1987799.
9
Googling Musculoskeletal-Related Pain and Ranking of Medical Associations' Patient Information Pages: Google Ads Keyword Planner Analysis.谷歌搜索肌肉骨骼相关疼痛和医疗协会患者信息页面排名:谷歌广告关键词规划师分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 14;22(8):e18684. doi: 10.2196/18684.
10
Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.评估关于系统性红斑狼疮的在线健康信息的质量、可靠性和可读性。
Lupus. 2018 Oct;27(12):1911-1917. doi: 10.1177/0961203318793213. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating ChatGPT's Utility in Biologic Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Google Web Search.评估ChatGPT在系统性红斑狼疮生物治疗中的效用:ChatGPT与谷歌网络搜索的比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 28;9:e76458. doi: 10.2196/76458.
2
The quality and reliability of online video resources concerning patient education for migraine treatment in China Mainland: an electronic media-based study.中国大陆偏头痛治疗患者教育在线视频资源的质量与可靠性:一项基于电子媒体的研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21861-x.
3
Crowdsourcing Adverse Events Associated With Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Signaling for Migraine Prevention: Natural Language Processing Analysis of Social Media.
基于社交媒体的自然语言处理分析:针对降钙素基因相关肽信号预防偏头痛的单克隆抗体相关不良事件众包
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 8;8:e58176. doi: 10.2196/58176.
4
Primary headache content on online community platforms: a scoping review protocol.在线社区平台上的原发性头痛内容:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 1;14(10):e083725. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083725.
5
Assessing the reliability and readability of migraine treatment information on Turkish websites.评估土耳其网站上偏头痛治疗信息的可靠性和可读性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1124. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11599-4.
6
A qualitative exploration of migraine in students attending Irish Universities.爱尔兰大学生偏头痛的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 23;19(8):e0305643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305643. eCollection 2024.
7
The increasing role of electronic media in headache.电子媒体在头痛中的作用日益增加。
BMC Neurol. 2023 May 17;23(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03196-5.
8
Readability of online health information pertaining to migraine and headache in the UK.英国有关偏头痛和头痛的在线健康信息的可读性。
Br J Pain. 2023 Apr;17(2):117-125. doi: 10.1177/20494637221134461. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
9
Quality assessment of consumer-facing websites on sodium reduction.消费者导向的减钠网站质量评估。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Oct;24(10):1285-1292. doi: 10.1111/jch.14572. Epub 2022 Sep 29.