• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进公众参与医疗保健教育和研究的个人发展:在英国一所高校开展的共同制作试点研究。

Facilitating personal development for public involvement in health-care education and research: A co-produced pilot study in one UK higher education institute.

机构信息

Learning Disability Nursing, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.

Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Science, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1191-1201. doi: 10.1111/hex.13097. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13097
PMID:32707602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7696120/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public involvement in the education of students enrolled on higher education programmes has gained impetus. For students enrolled on professional health-care programmes and health-related modules in the UK, there is also a requirement by professional bodies to include "service user" involvement in preparation for entry to a professional health-care register and continuing professional development. Actively involving patients and members of the public in research is also a requirement by many research funders. In this article, the term Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) will be used throughout to include lay members, volunteers, user and carers.

OBJECTIVES

A unique pilot study was introduced across a health faculty to integrate PPI in a deliberate way. It aimed to provide an educational, focused programme of events that was meaningful to develop and inform peoples' knowledge, skills and confidence for their involvement in the health faculty.

DESIGN

PPI members volunteered to sit on a steering group to determine the educational journey; the outcomes of three focus groups with PPI members (N = 32) and academics informed the programme content which included a range of workshops covering the exploration of public roles and barriers to involvement, introduction to research and interviewing skills.

RESULTS

The workshops were well attended, and outcomes indicated the importance of co-production when designing, delivering and evaluating programmes.

DISCUSSION

Co-production underpinned this pilot study, resulting in a programme which was meaningfully received by public contributors.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Co-production was seen as integral to this research to ensure that outcomes were indeed "fit for purpose".

摘要

背景

公众参与高等教育项目学生的教育已得到推动。在英国,对专业医疗保健项目和与健康相关模块的学生,专业机构也要求包括“服务使用者”参与,以准备进入专业医疗保健注册和持续专业发展。许多研究资助者也要求积极让患者和公众参与研究。在本文中,将使用“患者和公众参与(PPI)”一词来包括非专业人士、志愿者、使用者和照顾者。

目的

一项独特的试点研究在整个卫生学院引入,以有意地整合 PPI。它旨在提供一个有教育意义的、重点突出的活动计划,为人们参与卫生学院的知识、技能和信心发展提供信息。

设计

PPI 成员自愿加入指导小组,以确定教育旅程;对 32 名 PPI 成员和学者的三次焦点小组的结果为计划内容提供了信息,其中包括涵盖公众角色和参与障碍探索、研究介绍和访谈技巧的一系列研讨会。

结果

研讨会的参与度很高,结果表明在设计、交付和评估方案时共同创作的重要性。

讨论

共同创作是这项试点研究的基础,为公众参与者提供了有意义的计划。

建议

共同创作被视为该研究的重要组成部分,以确保结果确实“符合目的”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bef/7696120/6992f2deaa94/HEX-23-1191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bef/7696120/c464cd228266/HEX-23-1191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bef/7696120/6992f2deaa94/HEX-23-1191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bef/7696120/c464cd228266/HEX-23-1191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bef/7696120/6992f2deaa94/HEX-23-1191-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Facilitating personal development for public involvement in health-care education and research: A co-produced pilot study in one UK higher education institute.促进公众参与医疗保健教育和研究的个人发展:在英国一所高校开展的共同制作试点研究。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1191-1201. doi: 10.1111/hex.13097. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
2
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
3
A SHARED study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges.一项关于设立一项涉及非专业共同研究者的健康研究的益处与成本的联合研究,以及我们是如何克服这些挑战的。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 3;2:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0021-3. eCollection 2016.
4
Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the East Midlands: creating, delivering and evaluating the lay assessor training programme.与东米德兰兹地区的公众和研究组织成员共同开展公众参与培训:创建、实施和评估外行人评估员培训计划。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 5;3:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0056-0. eCollection 2017.
5
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
6
Patient public involvement (PPI) in health literacy research: Engagement of adults with literacy needs in the co-creation of a hospital-based health literacy plan.患者公众参与(PPI)在健康素养研究中的应用:有读写需求的成年人参与共同制定基于医院的健康素养计划。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1213-1220. doi: 10.1111/hex.13736. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
7
Evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the UK.评估英国一家大型生物医学研究中心的研究人员参与的患者和公众培训计划。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):e047995. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047995.
8
EQUIP training the trainers: an evaluation of a training programme for service users and carers involved in training mental health professionals in user-involved care planning.EQUIP培训培训者:对一项针对参与精神卫生专业人员用户参与式护理计划培训的服务使用者和护理者的培训项目的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):367-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12361. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
9
Exploring the impact of providing evidence-based medicine training to service users.探索为服务使用者提供循证医学培训的影响。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Aug 20;1:10. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0010-y. eCollection 2015.
10
'We're passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in': Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory.“我们是同乘一艘船的乘客,但我们有自己的卧铺睡觉”:在区域研究计划中评估患者和公众的参与:一项受正常化进程理论启发的行动研究项目。
PLoS One. 2019 May 14;14(5):e0215953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215953. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Making the case for service user involvement in the operating department practice curriculum: A discussion paper.论证服务使用者参与手术室实践课程的必要性:一篇讨论文件。
J Perioper Pract. 2025 Jun;35(6):244-248. doi: 10.1177/17504589241302940. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
Reflecting on the Spectrum of Involvement: How do we involve patients as partners in education?反思参与范围:我们如何让患者作为伙伴参与教育?
Med Educ. 2025 Feb;59(2):198-209. doi: 10.1111/medu.15484. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
3
A theoretical systematic review of patient involvement in health and social care education.

本文引用的文献

1
Clarifying the mechanisms and resources that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research: A collaborative rapid realist review process.阐明使鲜少被听见的群体能够互惠参与健康和社会关怀研究的机制和资源:合作式快速务实主义审查过程。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):298-306. doi: 10.1111/hex.12865. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
2
Patient and public involvement in primary care research - an example of ensuring its sustainability.患者及公众参与初级医疗研究——确保其可持续性的一个实例
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jan 14;2:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0015-1. eCollection 2016.
3
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.
患者参与卫生和社会保健教育的理论系统评价。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Mar;28(1):279-304. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10137-3. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
4
Methods to Generate Innovative Research Ideas and Improve Patient and Public Involvement in Modern Epidemiological Research: Review, Patient Viewpoint, and Guidelines for Implementation of a Digital Cohort Study.生成创新研究思路的方法和提高现代流行病学研究中患者和公众参与度的方法:综述、患者观点以及实施数字队列研究的指南。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 23;23(12):e25743. doi: 10.2196/25743.
5
The mutual benefits of patient and public involvement in research: an example from a feasibility study (MoTaStim-Foot).患者和公众参与研究的互利之处:一项可行性研究(MoTaStim-Foot)的实例
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Dec 4;7(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00330-w.
GRIPP2报告清单:改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453.
4
Service-user involvement in nurse education: partnership or tokenism?
Br J Nurs. 2014;23(22):1196-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.22.1196.
5
Service users' perceptions regarding their involvement in a physiotherapy educational programme in the UK: a qualitative study.服务使用者对其参与英国物理治疗教育计划的看法:一项定性研究。
Physiotherapy. 2013 Jun;99(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
6
Experts by experience; the views of service user educators providing feedback on medical students' work based assessments.有经验的专家;服务使用者教育者对医学生基于工作的评估的反馈意见。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Feb;32(2):146-50. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.08.015. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
7
The impact of service user involvement in research.服务使用者参与研究的影响。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2005;18(2-3):103-12. doi: 10.1108/09526860510588133.
8
Culture shift: carer empowerment and cooperative inquiry.文化转变:护理人员赋权与合作探究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2005 Apr;12(2):187-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2004.00816.x.
9
Action research: a few details, a caution and something new.
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jul;20(1):13-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20010013.x.