• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康服务对儿童参与儿科肿瘤护理的影响:准实验研究。

Impact of an Electronic Health Service on Child Participation in Pediatric Oncology Care: Quasiexperimental Study.

作者信息

Gilljam Britt-Mari, Nygren Jens M, Svedberg Petra, Arvidsson Susann

机构信息

School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 28;22(7):e17673. doi: 10.2196/17673.

DOI:10.2196/17673
PMID:32720907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7420525/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For children 6-12 years old, there is a shortage of electronic Health (eHealth) services that promote their participation in health care. Therefore, a digital communication tool, called Sisom, was developed to give children a voice in their health care. Children with long-term diseases want to be more involved in their health care and have the right to receive information, be listened to, express their opinions, and participate in decision making in health care. However, the outcomes of using Sisom in practice at pediatric oncology clinics have not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate children's participation during appointments with pediatricians at pediatric oncology clinics, with or without the use of the eHealth service Sisom.

METHODS

A quasiexperimental design with mixed methods was used. We analyzed 27 filmed appointments with pediatricians for 14 children (8 girls and 6 boys) aged 6-12 years (mean 8.3 years) with a cancer diagnosis. The intervention group consisted of children who used Sisom prior to their appointments with pediatricians at a pediatric oncology clinic, and the control group consisted of children who had appointments with pediatricians at 4 pediatric oncology clinics. Data from observations from the videos were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed. The quantitative analysis included manual calculations of how many times the pediatricians spoke directly to the children, the proportion of the appointment time that the children were talking, and levels of participation by the children. For the qualitative analysis, we used directed content analysis to analyze the children's levels of participation guided by a framework based on Shier's model of participation.

RESULTS

Pediatricians directed a greater proportion of their discussion toward the child in the intervention group (731 occasions) than in the control group (624 occasions), but the proportion of the appointment time the children talked was almost the same for both the intervention and control groups (mean 17.0 minutes vs 17.6 minutes). The levels of participation corresponded to the first three levels of Shier's participation model: children were listened to, children were supported to express their views, and children's views were taken into account. The results showed an increased level of participation by the children in the intervention group. Several codes that were found did not fit into any of the existing categories, and a new category was thus formed: children received information.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the eHealth service Sisom can increase children's participation during appointments with health care professionals. Further studies employing a randomized control design focusing on the effects of eHealth services on children's health outcomes, perceived participation, and cost-effectiveness could make a significant contribution to guiding the implementation of eHealth services in pediatric care.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d7/7420525/4e0dafcbcc22/jmir_v22i7e17673_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d7/7420525/13b142b1d80d/jmir_v22i7e17673_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d7/7420525/4e0dafcbcc22/jmir_v22i7e17673_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d7/7420525/13b142b1d80d/jmir_v22i7e17673_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d7/7420525/4e0dafcbcc22/jmir_v22i7e17673_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

对于6至12岁的儿童而言,促进他们参与医疗保健的电子健康(eHealth)服务短缺。因此,开发了一种名为Sisom的数字通信工具,以使儿童在其医疗保健中拥有发言权。患有慢性病的儿童希望更多地参与其医疗保健,并有权接收信息、被倾听、表达意见以及参与医疗保健决策。然而,在儿科肿瘤诊所实际使用Sisom的效果尚未得到研究。

目的

本研究的目的是调查在儿科肿瘤诊所与儿科医生预约期间,儿童在使用或不使用电子健康服务Sisom情况下的参与情况。

方法

采用了混合方法的准实验设计。我们分析了14名年龄在6至12岁(平均8.3岁)被诊断患有癌症的儿童(8名女孩和6名男孩)与儿科医生预约的27段视频记录。干预组由在儿科肿瘤诊所与儿科医生预约前使用Sisom的儿童组成,对照组由在4家儿科肿瘤诊所与儿科医生预约的儿童组成。对视频观察数据进行了定量和定性分析。定量分析包括人工计算儿科医生直接与儿童交谈的次数、儿童交谈时间在预约时间中所占的比例以及儿童的参与程度。对于定性分析,我们使用定向内容分析,以基于希尔参与模型的框架为指导,分析儿童的参与程度。

结果

与对照组(624次)相比,干预组儿科医生在讨论中针对儿童的比例更高(731次),但干预组和对照组儿童交谈时间在预约时间中所占的比例几乎相同(平均17.0分钟对17.6分钟)。参与程度符合希尔参与模型的前三个层次:儿童被倾听、儿童被支持表达观点以及儿童的观点被考虑在内。结果显示干预组儿童的参与程度有所提高。发现的几个编码不符合任何现有类别,因此形成了一个新类别:儿童接收信息。

结论

本研究表明,电子健康服务Sisom可以提高儿童在与医疗保健专业人员预约期间的参与程度。进一步采用随机对照设计的研究,聚焦于电子健康服务对儿童健康结果、感知参与度和成本效益的影响,可能会对指导电子健康服务在儿科护理中的实施做出重大贡献。

相似文献

1
Impact of an Electronic Health Service on Child Participation in Pediatric Oncology Care: Quasiexperimental Study.电子健康服务对儿童参与儿科肿瘤护理的影响:准实验研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 28;22(7):e17673. doi: 10.2196/17673.
2
Barriers and Enablers Affecting Successful Implementation of the Electronic Health Service Sisom: Multicenter Study of Child Participation in Pediatric Care.影响电子健康服务 Sisom 成功实施的障碍与促进因素:儿童参与儿科护理的多中心研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 15;21(11):e14271. doi: 10.2196/14271.
3
Creating a communication space in the healthcare context: Children's perspective of using the eHealth service, Sisom.创建医疗保健环境中的交流空间:儿童使用 Sisom 电子健康服务的观点。
J Child Health Care. 2021 Mar;25(1):31-43. doi: 10.1177/1367493520904804. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
4
Health professionals' perspectives on children's and young people's participation in health care: a qualitative multihospital study.医疗专业人员对儿童和青少年参与医疗保健的看法:一项多医院定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Apr;25(7-8):1035-44. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13152. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
Parents' experiences of an e-health intervention implemented in pediatric healthcare: a qualitative study.家长对儿科医疗中电子健康干预措施的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 5;19(1):800. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4643-7.
6
Redesign and Validation of Sisom, an Interactive Assessment and Communication Tool for Children With Cancer.重新设计 Sisom,一种用于癌症患儿的互动评估和沟通工具,并对其进行验证。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 24;4(2):e76. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5715.
7
Child participation in health care (ChiPaC)-Development and psychometric evaluation of a self-report instrument for children's participation in health care.儿童参与医疗保健(ChiPaC)-儿童参与医疗保健自我报告工具的开发和心理测量评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jan;29(1-2):107-118. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15063. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
8
Development of a Digital Decision Support Tool to Aid Participation of Children With Disabilities in Pediatric Rehabilitation Services: Explorative Qualitative Study.开发数字决策支持工具以促进残疾儿童参与儿科康复服务:探索性定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Oct 2;3(4):e14493. doi: 10.2196/14493.
9
Child participation during outpatient consultations: a mixed methods study.儿童在门诊咨询中的参与:一项混合方法研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jul;183(7):3019-3028. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05566-8. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
10
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Age Transformation in Patient-Physician Communication: 25-Year Narrative Review (1999-2023).医患沟通中的数字时代转型:25年叙事性综述(1999 - 2023)
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 16;27:e60512. doi: 10.2196/60512.
2
Parent Views on Parent and Child-reported Outcomes in Pediatric Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Study.儿科晚期癌症中父母对父母及儿童报告结局的看法:一项定性研究
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Feb;69(2):e131-e138. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
3
Decision-making for children and adolescents: a scoping review of interventions increasing participation in decision-making.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and Enablers Affecting Successful Implementation of the Electronic Health Service Sisom: Multicenter Study of Child Participation in Pediatric Care.影响电子健康服务 Sisom 成功实施的障碍与促进因素:儿童参与儿科护理的多中心研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 15;21(11):e14271. doi: 10.2196/14271.
2
eHealth and mHealth interventions in pediatric cancer: A systematic review of interventions across the cancer continuum.电子健康和移动医疗干预在儿科癌症中的应用:对癌症连续体中各项干预措施的系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jan;29(1):17-37. doi: 10.1002/pon.5280. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
3
Children's active participation in decision-making processes during hospitalisation: An observational study.
儿童和青少年的决策:对提高决策参与度干预措施的范围综述
Pediatr Res. 2024 Oct 6. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03509-5.
4
Family-centred care interventions for children with chronic conditions: A scoping review.以家庭为中心的照护干预措施在儿童慢性病管理中的应用:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13897. doi: 10.1111/hex.13897.
5
Asking those who know their needs best: A framework for active engagement and involvement of childhood cancer survivors and parents in the process of psychosocial research-A workshop report.让最了解需求的人参与:一项在心理社会研究中积极争取儿童癌症幸存者及其父母参与的框架 - 研讨会报告
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 May;7(5):e2071. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.2071.
6
Patient-Reported Outcome Benefits for Children with Advanced Cancer and Parents: A Qualitative Study.患儿及其家长的患者报告结局获益:一项定性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Sep;66(3):e327-e334. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.05.016. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
7
The effect of technology-based interventions on child and parent outcomes in pediatric oncology: A systemic review of experimental evidence.基于技术的干预措施对儿科肿瘤学中儿童和家长结局的影响:实验证据的系统评价。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Mar 30;10(5):100219. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100219. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Development and Evaluation of Internet-based Health Technology in Pediatric Oncology: A Scoping Review.基于互联网的儿科肿瘤学健康技术的开发和评估:范围综述。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):1125-1135. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.4.1125.
9
A Norm-Creative Method for Co-constructing Personas With Children With Disabilities: Multiphase Design Study.一种与残疾儿童共同构建人物角色的规范创新方法:多阶段设计研究。
J Particip Med. 2022 Jan 6;14(1):e29743. doi: 10.2196/29743.
10
Parents' Perceptions of the Value of Children's Participation in Pediatric Rehabilitation Services: A Phenomenographic Study.家长对儿童参与儿科康复服务价值的看法:一项现象学研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 18;18(20):10948. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010948.
儿童在住院期间积极参与决策过程:一项观察性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(23-24):4525-4537. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15042. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
4
Healthcare transition for adolescents and young adults with long-term conditions: Qualitative study of patients, parents and healthcare professionals' experiences.青少年和患有长期疾病的年轻人的医疗过渡:对患者、家长和医疗保健专业人员的经验的定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Nov;28(21-22):4062-4076. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15006. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
5
Smartphone apps to help children and adolescents with cancer and their families: a scoping review.智能手机应用程序帮助癌症患儿及其家庭:范围综述。
Acta Oncol. 2019 Jul;58(7):1003-1014. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1588474. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
6
Implementing a digital communication assistance tool to collect the medical history of refugee patients: DICTUM Friedland - an action-oriented mixed methods study protocol.实施数字通信辅助工具以收集难民患者的病史:DICTUM弗里德兰德——一项以行动为导向的混合方法研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3928-1.
7
Health care professionals' perspective on children's participation in health care situations: encounters in mutuality and alienation.卫生保健专业人员对儿童参与卫生保健情况的看法:相互作用和异化的遭遇。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1555421. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1555421.
8
Supporting children and young people to assume responsibility from their parents for the self-management of their long-term condition: An integrative review.支持儿童和年轻人从父母手中接过长期疾病自我管理的责任:一项综合综述。
Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Mar;45(2):175-188. doi: 10.1111/cch.12645.
9
The pros and cons of digital health communication tools in neurosurgery: a systematic review of literature.数字健康通信工具在神经外科学中的利弊:文献系统评价。
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Jun;43(3):835-846. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-1043-0. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
10
Exploring the needs and challenges of parents and their children in childhood epilepsy care: A qualitative study.探索儿童癫痫护理中家长及其子女的需求与挑战:一项定性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Nov;88:268-276. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Oct 12.