Doctoral Program in Health Sciences, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Fisiosur I+D Research Institute, Garrucha, Almería, Spain.
Trials. 2020 Jul 28;21(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04610-w.
Nonspecific chronic neck pain is a fairly common disorder that causes a great impact, and it is greatly influenced by psychosocial factors. Among a number of treatment modalities described for its management, the most common approach is based on manual therapy and specific therapeutic exercise, which have shown a moderate effect on subjects with chronic non-specific neck pain. However, the effect times of these treatments have not been accurately detailed. Our study aims to break down and compare the effects of two experimental treatments based on manual therapy and therapeutic exercise.
The short-term and mid-term changes produced by different therapies on subjects with non-specific chronic neck pain were studied. The sample was randomized divided into three groups: manual therapy, therapeutic exercise, and placebo. As dependent variables of our research, we studied (a) pain, based on the visual analog scale and the pressure pain threshold, and (b) cervical disability, through the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Outcomes were registered on week 1, week 4, and week 12. The findings were analyzed statistically considering a 5% significance level (P ≤ 0.05).
No statistically significant differences (P 0.05) were obtained between the experimental groups, if they exist against the control group. Nonetheless, we found that manual therapy improved perceived pain before than therapeutic exercise, while therapeutic exercise reduced cervical disability before than manual therapy. Effect size (R) shows medium and large effects for both experimental treatments.
There are no differences between groups in short and medium terms. Manual therapy achieves a faster reduction in pain perception than therapeutic exercise. Therapeutic exercise reduces disability faster than manual therapy. Clinical improvement could potentially be influenced by central processes.
Brazilian Clinical Trial Registry, RBR-2vj7sw. Registered on 28 November 2018.
非特异性慢性颈痛是一种相当常见的疾病,会造成很大的影响,并且受到心理社会因素的极大影响。在描述的许多治疗方法中,最常见的方法是基于手动治疗和特定的治疗运动,这些方法对慢性非特异性颈痛患者显示出中等疗效。然而,这些治疗的效果时间尚未准确详细说明。我们的研究旨在分解和比较基于手动治疗和治疗运动的两种实验性治疗方法的效果。
研究了不同治疗方法对非特异性慢性颈痛患者产生的短期和中期变化。该样本随机分为三组:手动治疗、治疗运动和安慰剂。作为我们研究的因变量,我们研究了(a)疼痛,基于视觉模拟量表和压力疼痛阈值,以及(b)颈椎功能障碍,通过颈部残疾指数(NDI)。结果在第 1 周、第 4 周和第 12 周进行登记。考虑到 5%的显著性水平(P≤0.05),对结果进行了统计分析。
实验组之间没有统计学上的显著差异(P > 0.05),如果与对照组存在差异的话。尽管如此,我们发现手动治疗在治疗运动之前改善了感知疼痛,而治疗运动在治疗运动之前降低了颈椎功能障碍。效应量(R)显示两种实验性治疗方法均具有中等和较大的效应。
在短期和中期内,组间无差异。手动治疗在感知疼痛方面比治疗运动更快地降低。治疗运动比手动治疗更快地降低残疾。临床改善可能受到中枢过程的影响。
巴西临床试验注册处,RBR-2vj7sw。注册于 2018 年 11 月 28 日。