The York Management School, University of York, Freboys Lane, Heslington, York YO10 5GD, UK.
The York Management School, University of York, Freboys Lane, Heslington, York YO10 5GD, UK.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Dec;112:103699. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103699. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
Against a backdrop of increasing demand for mental health services, and difficulties in recruitment and retention of mental health staff, employers may consider implementation of 12 h shifts to reduce wage costs. Mixed evidence regarding the impact of 12 h shifts may arise because research is conducted in divergent contexts. Much existing research is cross sectional in design and evaluates impact during the honeymoon phase of implementation. Previous research has not examined the impact of 12 h shifts in mental health service settings.
To evaluate how employees in acute mental health settings adapt and respond to a new 12 h shift system from a wellbeing perspective.
A qualitative approach was adopted to enable analysis of subjective employee experiences of changes to organisation contextual features arising from the shift pattern change, and to explore how this shapes wellbeing.
SETTING(S): Six acute mental health wards in the same geographical area of a large mental health care provider within the National Health Service in England.
70 participants including modern matrons, ward managers, clinical leads, staff nurses and healthcare assistants.
Semi-structured interviews with 35 participants at 6 months post-implementation of a new 12 h shift pattern, with a further 35 interviewed at 12 months post-implementation.
Thematic analysis identified unintended consequences of 12 h shifts as these patterns changed roles and the delivery of care, diminishing perceptions of quality of patient care, opportunities for social support, with reports of pacing work to preserve emotional and physical stamina. These features were moderated by older age, commitment to the public healthcare sector, and fit to individual circumstances in the non-work domain leading to divergent work-life balance outcomes.
Findings indicate potential exists for differential wellbeing outcomes of a 12 h shift pattern and negative effects are exacerbated in a stressful and dynamic acute mental health ward context. In a tight labour market with an ageing workforce, employee flexibility and choice are key to retention and wellbeing. Compulsory 12 h shift patterns should be avoided in this setting.
在精神卫生服务需求不断增加,以及招聘和留住精神卫生工作人员困难的背景下,雇主可能会考虑实施 12 小时轮班制来降低工资成本。12 小时轮班制的影响存在混合证据,这可能是因为研究是在不同的背景下进行的。许多现有的研究都是横断面设计,并且在实施的蜜月期评估影响。以前的研究没有检查精神卫生服务环境中 12 小时轮班制的影响。
从福利的角度评估急性精神卫生环境中的员工如何适应和应对新的 12 小时轮班制度。
采用定性方法,能够分析组织背景特征因轮班模式变化而发生的主观员工体验变化,并探讨这种变化如何影响福利。
英格兰国家卫生服务体系内同一家大型精神卫生保健机构内的六个急性精神卫生病房。
包括现代护士长、病房经理、临床主任、护士和医疗助理在内的 70 名参与者。
在实施新的 12 小时轮班模式 6 个月后对 35 名参与者进行半结构化访谈,并在实施 12 个月后对另外 35 名参与者进行访谈。
主题分析确定了 12 小时轮班的意外后果,因为这些模式改变了角色和护理的提供,降低了对患者护理质量的看法,减少了获得社会支持的机会,并报告了为保持情绪和身体耐力而调整工作节奏。这些特征因年龄较大、对公共医疗保健部门的承诺以及非工作领域中个人情况的适应而有所缓和,导致工作-生活平衡结果存在差异。
研究结果表明,12 小时轮班模式存在不同的福利结果的可能性,并且在紧张和动态的急性精神卫生病房环境中,负面影响会加剧。在劳动力市场紧张、劳动力老龄化的情况下,员工的灵活性和选择性是留住员工和提高福利的关键。在这种情况下,应避免强制性的 12 小时轮班模式。