Suppr超能文献

网络荟萃分析治疗慢性下背痛疾病的比较疗效:系统综述方案。

Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Physiotherapy, Hochschule fur Gesundheit, Bochum, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Service, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 29;11(11):e057112. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057112.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic low back pain disorders (CLBDs) present a substantial societal burden; however, optimal treatment remains debated. To date, pairwise and network meta-analyses have evaluated individual treatment modes, yet a comparison of a wide range of common treatments is required to evaluate their relative effectiveness. Using network meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments (acupuncture, education or advice, electrophysical agents, exercise, manual therapies/manipulation, massage, the McKenzie method, pharmacotherapy, psychological therapies, surgery, epidural injections, percutaneous treatments, traction, physical therapy, multidisciplinary pain management, placebo, 'usual care' and/or no treatment) on pain intensity, disability and/or mental health in patients with CLBDs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Six electronic databases and reference lists of 285 prior systematic reviews were searched. Eligible studies will be randomised controlled/clinical trials (including cross-over and cluster designs) that examine individual treatments or treatment combinations in adult patients with CLBDs. Studies must be published in English, German or Chinese as a full-journal publication in a peer-reviewed journal. A narrative approach will be used to synthesise and report qualitative and quantitative data, and, where feasible, network meta-analyses will be performed. Reporting of the review will be informed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidance, including the network meta-analysis extension (PRISMA-NMA). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach for network meta-analysis will be implemented for assessing the quality of the findings.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review of the published data. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO registration number CRD42020182039.

摘要

简介

慢性下背痛疾病(CLBD)给社会带来了巨大负担;然而,最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。迄今为止,已经对个体治疗模式进行了成对和网络荟萃分析,但需要比较广泛的常见治疗方法,以评估它们的相对有效性。本研究通过网络荟萃分析,旨在评估治疗方法(针刺、教育或建议、电物理因子、运动、手法治疗/推拿、按摩、麦肯齐法、药物治疗、心理治疗、手术、硬膜外注射、经皮治疗、牵引、物理治疗、多学科疼痛管理、安慰剂、“常规护理”和/或无治疗)对 CLBD 患者疼痛强度、残疾和/或心理健康的疗效。

方法和分析

检索了 6 个电子数据库和 285 篇系统评价的参考文献列表。纳入研究为随机对照/临床试验(包括交叉和群组设计),这些研究检查了 CLBD 成年患者的个体治疗或治疗组合。研究必须以英文、德文或中文发表在同行评审期刊上的全文期刊文章。将采用叙述性方法来综合和报告定性和定量数据,并在可行的情况下进行网络荟萃分析。本综述的报告将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,包括网络荟萃分析扩展(PRISMA-NMA)。将实施网络荟萃分析的推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)方法来评估研究结果的质量。

伦理和传播

本研究为已发表数据的系统综述,无需伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物进行传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42020182039。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e0d/8634013/94755e2a27b0/bmjopen-2021-057112f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验