Physiotherapy, Hochschule fur Gesundheit, Bochum, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Service, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 29;11(11):e057112. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057112.
Chronic low back pain disorders (CLBDs) present a substantial societal burden; however, optimal treatment remains debated. To date, pairwise and network meta-analyses have evaluated individual treatment modes, yet a comparison of a wide range of common treatments is required to evaluate their relative effectiveness. Using network meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments (acupuncture, education or advice, electrophysical agents, exercise, manual therapies/manipulation, massage, the McKenzie method, pharmacotherapy, psychological therapies, surgery, epidural injections, percutaneous treatments, traction, physical therapy, multidisciplinary pain management, placebo, 'usual care' and/or no treatment) on pain intensity, disability and/or mental health in patients with CLBDs.
Six electronic databases and reference lists of 285 prior systematic reviews were searched. Eligible studies will be randomised controlled/clinical trials (including cross-over and cluster designs) that examine individual treatments or treatment combinations in adult patients with CLBDs. Studies must be published in English, German or Chinese as a full-journal publication in a peer-reviewed journal. A narrative approach will be used to synthesise and report qualitative and quantitative data, and, where feasible, network meta-analyses will be performed. Reporting of the review will be informed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidance, including the network meta-analysis extension (PRISMA-NMA). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach for network meta-analysis will be implemented for assessing the quality of the findings.
Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review of the published data. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42020182039.
慢性下背痛疾病(CLBD)给社会带来了巨大负担;然而,最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。迄今为止,已经对个体治疗模式进行了成对和网络荟萃分析,但需要比较广泛的常见治疗方法,以评估它们的相对有效性。本研究通过网络荟萃分析,旨在评估治疗方法(针刺、教育或建议、电物理因子、运动、手法治疗/推拿、按摩、麦肯齐法、药物治疗、心理治疗、手术、硬膜外注射、经皮治疗、牵引、物理治疗、多学科疼痛管理、安慰剂、“常规护理”和/或无治疗)对 CLBD 患者疼痛强度、残疾和/或心理健康的疗效。
检索了 6 个电子数据库和 285 篇系统评价的参考文献列表。纳入研究为随机对照/临床试验(包括交叉和群组设计),这些研究检查了 CLBD 成年患者的个体治疗或治疗组合。研究必须以英文、德文或中文发表在同行评审期刊上的全文期刊文章。将采用叙述性方法来综合和报告定性和定量数据,并在可行的情况下进行网络荟萃分析。本综述的报告将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,包括网络荟萃分析扩展(PRISMA-NMA)。将实施网络荟萃分析的推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)方法来评估研究结果的质量。
本研究为已发表数据的系统综述,无需伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物进行传播。
PROSPERO 注册号:PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42020182039。