• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于全减压和硬脊膜处理的经皮双门内镜脊柱手术的新型器械:一项对比分析

Novel Instruments for Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Full Decompression and Dural Management: A Comparative Analysis.

作者信息

Hong Young-Ho, Kim Seung-Kook, Suh Dong-Won, Lee Su-Chan

机构信息

Department of Spine Center, Barun-Sesang Hospital, 5, Yatap-ro 75 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13497, Korea.

Himchan UHS Spine and Joint Institute, University Hospital of Sharjah, University Street 1, Sharjah 72772, UAE.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 4;10(8):516. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10080516.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci10080516
PMID:32759697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7463780/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-laminectomy syndrome is a common cause of dissatisfaction after endoscopic interlaminar approach. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of our two newly designed instruments for laminotomy, a dural protector attached to the scope and a knot pusher for water-tight suturing of the incidental dural tears.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a multicenter evaluation. Efficacy was quantified as the pre-to-postoperative improvement in pain (visual analog scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), patient satisfaction (modified MacNab score), and length of hospital stay. Safety was quantified by the incidence and location of dural tears, rate of revision, and radiological outcomes. Outcomes were evaluated between the control (before instrument development) and experimental (after instrument development) groups.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in leg pain in the experimental group ( = 0.03), with greater patient satisfaction in the control group ( < 0.01). There was no incidence of dural tears in the area of the traversing and exiting nerve roots in the experimental group. Water-tightness of sutures was confirmed radiologically.

CONCLUSION

The novel dural protector and the knot pusher for water-tight sutures improved the efficacy and safety of decompression and discectomy; however, a prolonged operative time was a drawback.

摘要

背景

椎板切除术后综合征是内镜下椎间入路术后患者不满意的常见原因。我们的目的是评估我们新设计的两种椎板切开器械的有效性和安全性,一种是连接在镜上的硬脊膜保护器,另一种是用于对意外硬脊膜撕裂进行水密缝合的打结器。

材料与方法

这是一项多中心评估。有效性通过术前至术后疼痛(视觉模拟评分)、功能障碍(奥斯维斯特功能障碍指数)、患者满意度(改良MacNab评分)和住院时间的改善来量化。安全性通过硬脊膜撕裂的发生率和位置、翻修率以及影像学结果来量化。在对照组(器械开发前)和实验组(器械开发后)之间评估结果。

结果

实验组腿痛有显著改善( = 0.03),对照组患者满意度更高( < 0.01)。实验组在横过和穿出神经根区域未发生硬脊膜撕裂。通过影像学证实了缝合的水密性。

结论

新型硬脊膜保护器和用于水密缝合的打结器提高了减压和椎间盘切除术的有效性和安全性;然而,手术时间延长是一个缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/47f0182e9587/brainsci-10-00516-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/47fb44a38980/brainsci-10-00516-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/799f09e25b71/brainsci-10-00516-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/5854b5660c6a/brainsci-10-00516-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/ed680d772047/brainsci-10-00516-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/649a70ff2ba0/brainsci-10-00516-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/47f0182e9587/brainsci-10-00516-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/47fb44a38980/brainsci-10-00516-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/799f09e25b71/brainsci-10-00516-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/5854b5660c6a/brainsci-10-00516-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/ed680d772047/brainsci-10-00516-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/649a70ff2ba0/brainsci-10-00516-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556e/7463780/47f0182e9587/brainsci-10-00516-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Novel Instruments for Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Full Decompression and Dural Management: A Comparative Analysis.用于全减压和硬脊膜处理的经皮双门内镜脊柱手术的新型器械:一项对比分析
Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 4;10(8):516. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10080516.
2
Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery.三种微创减压手术治疗腰椎中央型狭窄的对比分析:双通道内镜、单通道内镜和显微镜手术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS197.
3
Dural Tears in Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Anatomical Location and Management.经皮双门内镜脊柱手术中的硬脊膜撕裂:解剖位置与处理
World Neurosurg. 2020 Apr;136:e578-e585. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.080. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
4
[EXPERIENCE OF BIPORTAL ENDOSCOPIC DECOMPRESSION IN LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS].[双孔通道内镜下减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的经验]
Georgian Med News. 2020 Jun(303):21-27.
5
Dural Tears During Lumbar Spinal Endoscopy: Surgeon Skill, Training, Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management.腰椎脊柱内镜检查术中的硬脊膜撕裂:术者技能、培训、发生率、危险因素及处理
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):280-294. doi: 10.14444/8038. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
6
Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Discectomy Using Biportal Endoscopic Approach: Technical Report and Preliminary Clinical Results.经皮双通道内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧椎间盘切除术:技术报告和初步临床结果。
World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.190. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
7
Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression.冲洗式内镜减压椎板切除术。一种用于脊柱狭窄减压的新内镜手术方法。
Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
8
Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results.经皮双门内镜下减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症:技术说明及初步临床结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Apr;24(4):602-7. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.SPINE15304. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
9
Percutaneous Endoscopic Laminotomy with Flavectomy by Uniportal, Unilateral Approach for the Lumbar Canal or Lateral Recess Stenosis.经皮单通道、单侧入路内镜下腰椎板切除术联合黄韧带切除术治疗腰椎管或侧隐窝狭窄症
World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:e129-e137. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.195. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
10
Preliminary Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of the "No-Punch" Decompression Techniques for Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery.单侧双门内镜脊柱手术“无打孔”减压技术的初步临床和影像学结果
Neurospine. 2024 Jun;21(2):732-741. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448376.188. Epub 2024 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Is percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy necessary for learning the unilateral biportal endoscopy technique?学习单侧双通道内镜技术有必要进行经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术吗?
Front Surg. 2025 Apr 11;12:1530325. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1530325. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical efficacy of AUSS/UNSES-TLIF in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study.AUSS/UNSES-TLIF治疗单节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 9;20(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05779-z.
3
Nonlaminotomy bilateral decompression: a novel approach in biportal endoscopic spine surgery for spinal stenosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Dural Tears in Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Anatomical Location and Management.经皮双门内镜脊柱手术中的硬脊膜撕裂:解剖位置与处理
World Neurosurg. 2020 Apr;136:e578-e585. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.080. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
2
Pooled analysis of unsuccessful percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery outcomes from a multi-institutional retrospective cohort of 797 cases.多机构回顾性队列 797 例中经皮双腔内镜手术失败结局的汇总分析。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Feb;162(2):279-287. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04162-2. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
3
Percutaneous Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery Using a 30-Degree Arthroscope in Patients With Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Technical Note.
非椎板切开双侧减压:双门内镜脊柱手术治疗椎管狭窄的一种新方法。
Asian Spine J. 2024 Dec;18(6):867-874. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0210. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
4
Comprehensive Analysis of UBE-Related Complications: Prevention and Management Strategies from 4685 Patients.UBE 相关并发症的全面分析:4685 例患者的预防和管理策略。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Oct 10;30:e944018. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944018.
5
Preliminary Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of the "No-Punch" Decompression Techniques for Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery.单侧双门内镜脊柱手术“无打孔”减压技术的初步临床和影像学结果
Neurospine. 2024 Jun;21(2):732-741. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448376.188. Epub 2024 Jun 30.
6
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜椎间孔切开椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较
J Pain Res. 2024 May 14;17:1737-1744. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S449620. eCollection 2024.
7
Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a comparative analysis of learning curves.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术与单侧双孔道内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:学习曲线的比较分析
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2154-2165. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08293-8. Epub 2024 May 10.
8
Polytomous Rasch Analyses of Surgeons' Decision-Making on Choice of Procedure in Endoscopic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Decompression Surgeries.内镜下腰椎管狭窄减压手术中外科医生手术选择决策的多分类Rasch分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 May 6;18(2):164-177. doi: 10.14444/8595.
9
Comparison of the results of open PLIF versus UBE PLIF in lumbar spinal stenosis: postoperative adjacent segment instability is lesser in UBE.比较开放 PLIF 和 UBE PLIF 治疗腰椎管狭窄症的结果:UBE 术后邻近节段不稳定程度较低。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 29;18(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04038-3.
10
Indications for and Outcomes of Three Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Approaches for the Decompression of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review.三种单侧双孔道内镜治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄减压术的适应症及疗效:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 14;13(6):1092. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061092.
使用30度关节镜对重度腰椎管狭窄症患者进行经皮单侧双孔道内镜脊柱手术:技术说明
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Oct;32(8):324-329. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000876.
4
A Novel Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Symptomatic Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis: Technical Note and Case Presentations.一种治疗症状性椎管硬膜外脂肪增多症的新型经皮双通道内窥镜技术:技术说明和病例报告。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.214. Epub 2019 May 30.
5
Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎间融合术(ULIF)与传统后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)的临床和影像学结果比较:1 年随访。
Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Sep;42(3):753-761. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01114-3. Epub 2019 May 29.
6
Comparative Analysis between Three Different Lumbar Decompression Techniques (Microscopic, Tubular, and Endoscopic) in Lumbar Canal and Lateral Recess Stenosis: Preliminary Report.三种不同腰椎减压技术(显微镜下、管状和内窥镜)治疗腰椎管和侧隐窝狭窄的比较分析:初步报告。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 24;2019:6078469. doi: 10.1155/2019/6078469. eCollection 2019.
7
Therapeutic Feasibility of Full Endoscopic Decompression in One- to Three-Level Lumbar Canal Stenosis via a Single Skin Port Using a New Endoscopic System, Percutaneous Stenoscopic Lumbar Decompression.使用新型内镜系统经皮狭窄镜下腰椎减压术通过单一皮肤切口对一至三级腰椎管狭窄症进行全内镜减压的治疗可行性。
Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr;13(2):272-282. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0228. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
8
Prevention of Nerve Root Thermal Injury Caused by Bipolar Cauterization Near the Nerve Roots.预防神经根附近双极电凝时神经根热损伤。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 15;44(6):E321-E328. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002846.
9
Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Arthroscopy.双孔道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术联合关节镜检查
Clin Orthop Surg. 2018 Jun;10(2):248-252. doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.248. Epub 2018 May 18.
10
"Microendoscopic" versus "pure endoscopic" surgery for spinal intradural mass lesions: a comparative study and review.显微镜下手术与单纯内镜手术治疗椎管内硬脊膜内占位病变的对比研究及综述
Spine J. 2018 Sep;18(9):1592-1602. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 13.