• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深度学习方法在34个低收入和中等收入国家预测五岁以下儿童死亡率中的有效性。

Efficacy of deep learning methods for predicting under-five mortality in 34 low-income and middle-income countries.

作者信息

Adegbosin Adeyinka Emmanuel, Stantic Bela, Sun Jing

机构信息

School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 16;10(8):e034524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034524.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034524
PMID:32801191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7430449/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the efficacy of machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting under-five mortality (U5M) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and to identify significant predictors of U5M.

DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional, proof-of-concept study.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

We analysed data from the Demographic and Health Survey. The data were drawn from 34 LMICs, comprising a total of n=1 520 018 children drawn from 956 995 unique households.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was U5M; secondary outcome was comparing the efficacy of deep learning algorithms: deep neural network (DNN); convolution neural network (CNN); hybrid CNN-DNN with logistic regression (LR) for the prediction of child's survival.

RESULTS

We found that duration of breast feeding, number of antenatal visits, household wealth index, postnatal care and the level of maternal education are some of the most important predictors of U5M. We found that deep learning techniques are superior to LR for the classification of child survival: LR sensitivity=0.47, specificity=0.53; DNN sensitivity=0.69, specificity=0.83; CNN sensitivity=0.68, specificity=0.83; CNN-DNN sensitivity=0.71, specificity=0.83.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide an understanding of determinants of U5M in LMICs. It also demonstrates that deep learning models are more efficacious than traditional analytical approach.

摘要

目标

探讨机器学习(ML)技术在预测低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)五岁以下儿童死亡率(U5M)方面的效果,并确定U5M的重要预测因素。

设计

这是一项横断面概念验证研究。

设置和参与者

我们分析了人口与健康调查的数据。数据来自34个LMICs,共包括来自956995个独特家庭的n = 1520018名儿童。

主要和次要结局指标

主要结局指标是U5M;次要结局是比较深度学习算法的效果:深度神经网络(DNN);卷积神经网络(CNN);结合逻辑回归(LR)的混合CNN-DNN用于预测儿童生存情况。

结果

我们发现母乳喂养持续时间、产前检查次数、家庭财富指数、产后护理和母亲教育水平是U5M的一些最重要预测因素。我们发现深度学习技术在儿童生存分类方面优于LR:LR的敏感性= 0.47,特异性= 0.53;DNN的敏感性= 0.69,特异性= 0.83;CNN的敏感性= 0.68,特异性= 0.83;CNN-DNN的敏感性= 0.71,特异性= 0.83。

结论

我们的研究结果有助于了解LMICs中U5M的决定因素。它还表明深度学习模型比传统分析方法更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/055a/7430449/5e8a49087d85/bmjopen-2019-034524f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/055a/7430449/6817d2e0d2b5/bmjopen-2019-034524f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/055a/7430449/62eacd827571/bmjopen-2019-034524f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/055a/7430449/c1954d89291c/bmjopen-2019-034524f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/055a/7430449/5e8a49087d85/bmjopen-2019-034524f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/055a/7430449/6817d2e0d2b5/bmjopen-2019-034524f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/055a/7430449/62eacd827571/bmjopen-2019-034524f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/055a/7430449/c1954d89291c/bmjopen-2019-034524f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/055a/7430449/5e8a49087d85/bmjopen-2019-034524f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of deep learning methods for predicting under-five mortality in 34 low-income and middle-income countries.深度学习方法在34个低收入和中等收入国家预测五岁以下儿童死亡率中的有效性。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 16;10(8):e034524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034524.
2
Application of machine learning methods for predicting under-five mortality: analysis of Nigerian demographic health survey 2018 dataset.机器学习方法在预测五岁以下儿童死亡率中的应用:对 2018 年尼日利亚人口健康调查数据集的分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Mar 25;24(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02476-5.
3
Use of a deep learning and random forest approach to track changes in the predictive nature of socioeconomic drivers of under-5 mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa.利用深度学习和随机森林方法追踪撒哈拉以南非洲地区影响 5 岁以下儿童死亡率的社会经济驱动因素的预测能力的变化。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 17;12(2):e049786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049786.
4
Geostatistical analysis and mapping: social and environmental determinants of under-five child mortality, evidence from the 2014 Ghana demographic and health survey.地理统计分析与绘图:五岁以下儿童死亡率的社会和环境决定因素,来自2014年加纳人口与健康调查的证据
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;20(1):1428. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09534-3.
5
Predicting mortality among patients with liver cirrhosis in electronic health records with machine learning.利用机器学习预测电子健康记录中肝硬化患者的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 31;16(8):e0256428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256428. eCollection 2021.
6
Assessment of Automated Identification of Phases in Videos of Cataract Surgery Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques.使用机器学习和深度学习技术评估白内障手术视频中的相位自动识别。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191860. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1860.
7
The impact of household wealth on child survival in Ghana.加纳家庭财富对儿童生存的影响。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2016 Nov 22;35(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41043-016-0074-9.
8
Association between concurrence of multiple risk factors and under-5 mortality: a pooled analysis of data from Demographic and Health Survey in 61 low-and-middle-income countries.多种风险因素并存与五岁以下儿童死亡率之间的关联:对61个低收入和中等收入国家人口与健康调查数据的汇总分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Apr 5;71:102583. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102583. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Delivery channels and socioeconomic inequalities in coverage of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: analysis of 36 cross-sectional surveys in low-income and middle-income countries.生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施的提供渠道和社会经济不平等:对低收入和中等收入国家的 36 项横断面调查的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Aug;9(8):e1101-e1109. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00204-7. Epub 2021 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying determinants of under-5 mortality in Bangladesh: A machine learning approach with BDHS 2022 data.识别孟加拉国5岁以下儿童死亡率的决定因素:基于2022年孟加拉国人口与健康调查数据的机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 11;20(6):e0324825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324825. eCollection 2025.
2
Analyzing and forecasting under-5 mortality trends in Bangladesh using machine learning techniques.使用机器学习技术分析和预测孟加拉国5岁以下儿童死亡率趋势。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 7;20(2):e0317715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317715. eCollection 2025.
3
Applied artificial intelligence for global child health: Addressing biases and barriers.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial intelligence: opportunities and risks for public health.人工智能:公共卫生的机遇与风险。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 May;1(1):e13-e14. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30002-0. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
Determinants of neonatal mortality in the largest international border of Brazil: a case-control study.巴西最大国际边境地区新生儿死亡的决定因素:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 16;19(1):1304. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7638-8.
3
Machine Learning Versus Logistic Regression Methods for 2-Year Mortality Prognostication in a Small, Heterogeneous Glioma Database.
应用人工智能促进全球儿童健康:应对偏见与障碍。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Aug 22;3(8):e0000583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000583. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
The use of artificial intelligence for delivery of essential health services across WHO regions: a scoping review.人工智能在 WHO 各区域提供基本卫生服务中的应用:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 4;11:1102185. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1102185. eCollection 2023.
5
Predicting the HIV/AIDS Knowledge among the Adolescent and Young Adult Population in Peru: Application of Quasi-Binomial Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Algorithms.预测秘鲁青少年和青年人群中的艾滋病毒/艾滋病知识:拟二项逻辑回归和机器学习算法的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;20(7):5318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075318.
6
Data harnessing to nurture the human mind for a tailored approach to the child.利用数据培养人类思维,以便为儿童量身定制方法。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Jan;93(2):357-365. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02320-4. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
7
Machine Learning Algorithms for understanding the determinants of under-five Mortality.用于理解五岁以下儿童死亡率决定因素的机器学习算法
BioData Min. 2022 Sep 24;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13040-022-00308-8.
8
A Review of Converging Technologies in eHealth Pertaining to Artificial Intelligence.人工智能在电子健康领域相关的汇聚技术综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 10;19(18):11413. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811413.
9
Trends of under-five mortality and associated risk factors in Zambia: a multi survey analysis between 2007 and 2018.赞比亚 5 岁以下儿童死亡率趋势及相关危险因素:2007 年至 2018 年多轮调查分析
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Jun 13;22(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03362-7.
10
Application of machine learning methods for predicting infant mortality in Rwanda: analysis of Rwanda demographic health survey 2014-15 dataset.机器学习方法在预测卢旺达婴儿死亡率中的应用:对 2014-15 年卢旺达人口健康调查数据集的分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 May 4;22(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04699-8.
在一个小型、异质性胶质瘤数据库中,机器学习与逻辑回归方法用于2年死亡率预测的比较
World Neurosurg X. 2019 Jan 24;2:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2019.100012. eCollection 2019 Apr.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between dimensions of inequality and a selection of indicators of Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (RMNCH).不平等维度与生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康(RMNCH)选择指标关联的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010429. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010429.
5
National, regional, and global levels and trends in neonatal mortality between 1990 and 2017, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis.1990 年至 2017 年期间,国家、地区和全球各级以及新生儿死亡率的趋势,并基于情景预测到 2030 年:系统分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jun;7(6):e710-e720. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30163-9.
6
Artificial intelligence, machine learning and health systems.人工智能、机器学习与卫生系统。
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020303. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020303.
7
The Human Behaviour-Change Project: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and machine learning for evidence synthesis and interpretation.人类行为改变项目:利用人工智能和机器学习的力量进行证据综合和解释。
Implement Sci. 2017 Oct 18;12(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0641-5.
8
Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning.利用机器学习在急诊科分诊时创建用于脓毒症临床决策支持的自动触发机制。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 6;12(4):e0174708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174708. eCollection 2017.
9
Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?机器学习能否利用常规临床数据改善心血管疾病风险预测?
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 4;12(4):e0174944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174944. eCollection 2017.
10
When do newborns die? A systematic review of timing of overall and cause-specific neonatal deaths in developing countries.新生儿何时死亡?对发展中国家总体及特定原因新生儿死亡时间的系统评价。
J Perinatol. 2016 May;36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-S11. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.27.