Cheung Victor Kai-Lam, So Eric Hang-Kwong, Ng George Wing-Yiu, So Sze-Sze, Hung Jeff Leung-Kit, Chia Nam-Hung
Multi-Disciplinary Simulation & Skills Centre (MDSSC), Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
The Department of Neuroscience, Psychology & Behaviour, University of Leicester, UK.
Integr Med Res. 2020 Sep;9(3):100476. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100476. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
This cross-sectional study aimed at evaluating impacts of healthcare simulation training, either in-situ or lab-based, on personal strengths of healthcare workers (HCWs) and organizational outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
COVID-19 Taskforce was established to formulate standardized scenario-based simulation training materials in late-January 2020. Post-training questionnaires made up of 5-point Likert scales were distributed to all participants to evaluate their personal strengths, in terms of i) assertiveness, ii) mental preparedness, iii) self-efficacy, iv) internal locus of control, and v) internal locus of responsibility. Independent sample t-tests were used to analyze between-group difference in "In-situ" and "Lab-based" group; and one-sample t-tests were used to compare change in personal strengths with reference point of 3 (Neutral). Kirkpatrick's Model served as the analytical framework for overall training effects.
Between 05 February and 18 March 2020, 101 sessions of simulation training were conducted in "In-Situ" at either Accident & Emergency Department (20, 20%) or Intensive Care Unit (15, 14%) and "Lab-based" for Isolation (30, 30%) and General Wards (36, 36%). 1,415 hospital staff members, including 1,167 nurses (82%), 163 doctors (12%) and 85 patient care assistants (6%), were trained. All domains of personal strengths were scored 4.24 or above and statistically significantly increased when comparing with reference population ( < .001). However, no significant differences between in-situ and lab-based simulation were found ( > .05), for all domains of personal strengths.
Healthcare simulation training enhanced healthcare workers' personal strengths critical to operational and clinical outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
本横断面研究旨在评估在新冠疫情期间,现场或基于实验室的医疗模拟培训对医护人员个人优势及组织成果的影响。
2020年1月下旬成立了新冠疫情特别工作组,以制定基于标准化情景的模拟培训材料。向所有参与者发放由5级李克特量表组成的培训后问卷,以评估他们在以下方面的个人优势:i)自信,ii)心理准备,iii)自我效能感,iv)内控点,v)责任内控点。使用独立样本t检验分析“现场”组和“基于实验室”组之间的组间差异;使用单样本t检验将个人优势的变化与3(中性)的参考点进行比较。柯克帕特里克模型作为整体培训效果的分析框架。
2020年2月5日至3月18日期间,在急诊科(20次,20%)或重症监护室(15次,14%)进行了101次“现场”模拟培训,在隔离区(30次,30%)和普通病房(36次,36%)进行了“基于实验室”的模拟培训。共培训了1415名医院工作人员,其中包括1167名护士(82%)、163名医生(12%)和85名患者护理助理(6%)。个人优势的所有领域得分均在4.24及以上,与参考人群相比有统计学显著提高(<.001)。然而,在个人优势的所有领域,现场模拟和基于实验室的模拟之间未发现显著差异(>.05)。
医疗模拟培训增强了医护人员在新冠疫情期间对运营和临床结果至关重要的个人优势。