Department of Otolaryngology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Department of Otolaryngology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):1604-1611. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004554.
To determine whether a modifiable risk factor, endotracheal tube size, is associated with the diagnosis of postextubation aspiration in survivors of acute respiratory failure.
Prospective cohort study.
ICUs at four academic tertiary care medical centers.
Two hundred ten patients who were at least 18 years old, admitted to an ICU, and mechanically ventilated with an endotracheal tube for longer than 48 hours were enrolled.
Within 72 hours of extubation, all patients received a flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing examination that entailed administration of ice, thin liquid, thick liquid, puree, and cracker boluses. Patient demographics, treatment variables, and hospital outcomes were abstracted from the patient's medical records. Endotracheal tube size was independently selected by the patient's treating physicians.
For each flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing examination, laryngeal pathology was evaluated, and for each bolus, a Penetration Aspiration Scale score was assigned. Aspiration (Penetration Aspiration Scale score ≥ 6) was further categorized into nonsilent aspiration (Penetration Aspiration Scale score = 6 or 7) and silent aspiration (Penetration Aspiration Scale score = 8). One third of patients (n = 68) aspirated (Penetration Aspiration Scale score ≥ 6) on at least one bolus, 13.6% (n = 29) exhibited silent aspiration, and 23.8% (n = 50) exhibited nonsilent aspiration. In a multivariable analysis, endotracheal tube size (≤ 7.5 vs ≥ 8.0) was significantly associated with patients exhibiting any aspiration (Penetration Aspiration Scale score ≥ 6) (p = 0.016; odds ratio = 2.17; 95% CI 1.14-4.13) and with risk of developing laryngeal granulation tissue (p = 0.02).
Larger endotracheal tube size was associated with increased risk of aspiration and laryngeal granulation tissue. Using smaller endotracheal tubes may reduce the risk of postextubation aspiration.
确定可改变的风险因素——气管导管大小是否与急性呼吸衰竭患者拔管后发生吸入的诊断有关。
前瞻性队列研究。
四家学术性三级护理医疗中心的 ICU。
纳入 210 名至少 18 岁、入住 ICU、接受气管内插管机械通气超过 48 小时的患者。
在拔管后 72 小时内,所有患者均接受了软性内镜吞咽评估检查,包括给予冰、稀薄液体、浓稠液体、泥状食物和饼干块。患者的人口统计学资料、治疗变量和住院结果均从患者的病历中提取。气管导管大小由患者的主治医生独立选择。
对于每一次软性内镜吞咽评估检查,评估了喉病理学,并且对于每个测试物,都给予了渗透-抽吸量表评分。(渗透-抽吸量表评分≥6)进一步分为有或无声的吸入(渗透-抽吸量表评分=6 或 7)和无声的吸入(渗透-抽吸量表评分=8)。三分之一的患者(n=68)在至少一个测试物中发生了吸入(渗透-抽吸量表评分≥6),13.6%(n=29)发生了无声的吸入,23.8%(n=50)发生了有声音的吸入。在多变量分析中,气管导管大小(≤7.5 与≥8.0)与发生任何吸入(渗透-抽吸量表评分≥6)的患者显著相关(p=0.016;优势比=2.17;95%置信区间 1.14-4.13),且与发生喉肉芽组织的风险相关(p=0.02)。
更大的气管导管大小与吸入和喉肉芽组织的风险增加有关。使用较小的气管导管可能会降低拔管后吸入的风险。