Räsänen J, Downs J B, Stock M C
Department of Anesthesiology, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Chest. 1988 May;93(5):911-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.93.5.911.
The hemodynamic sequelae of conventional positive pressure ventilation (CPPV), airway pressure release ventilation (APRV), and spontaneous breathing were compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in ten anesthetized dogs who had ventilatory failure with and without parenchymal lung injury. The APRV corrected respiratory acidosis without significantly effecting arterial blood oxygenation, venous admixture, cardiovascular function, or tissue oxygen utilization. Application of CPPV precipitated marked depressions in blood pressure, stroke volume, and cardiac output. A concomitant decrease in venous admixture did not compensate for these adverse cardiovascular effects. Deterioration of tissue oxygen delivery resulted in oxygen supply-demand imbalance during CPPV. The results of this experimental study indicate that if ventilatory augmentation of subjects who require CPAP is desired, APRV will enhance alveolar ventilation without compromising circulatory function and tissue oxygen balance, whereas CPPV will impair cardiovascular function significantly.
在十只麻醉的、伴有或不伴有实质性肺损伤且存在通气衰竭的犬中,对传统正压通气(CPPV)、气道压力释放通气(APRV)、自主呼吸以及持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的血流动力学后遗症进行了比较。APRV可纠正呼吸性酸中毒,而对动脉血氧合、静脉血掺杂、心血管功能或组织氧利用无显著影响。应用CPPV会导致血压、每搏输出量和心输出量显著降低。静脉血掺杂的相应减少并不能弥补这些不良心血管效应。在CPPV期间,组织氧输送的恶化导致了氧供需失衡。这项实验研究的结果表明,如果需要对需要CPAP的受试者进行通气增强,APRV将增强肺泡通气而不损害循环功能和组织氧平衡,而CPPV将显著损害心血管功能。