Global Program in Respiratory Sciences, Eudowood Division of Pediatric Respiratory Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Nov;55(11):3197-3208. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25046. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
Whether digitally recorded lung sounds are associated with radiographic pneumonia or clinical outcomes among children in low-income and middle-income countries is unknown. We sought to address these knowledge gaps.
We enrolled 1 to 59monthold children hospitalized with pneumonia at eight African and Asian Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health sites in six countries, recorded digital stethoscope lung sounds, obtained chest radiographs, and collected clinical outcomes. Recordings were processed and classified into binary categories positive or negative for adventitial lung sounds. Listening and reading panels classified recordings and radiographs. Recording classification associations with chest radiographs with World Health Organization (WHO)-defined primary endpoint pneumonia (radiographic pneumonia) or mortality were evaluated. We also examined case fatality among risk strata.
Among children without WHO danger signs, wheezing (without crackles) had a lower adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for radiographic pneumonia (0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15, 0.82), compared to children with normal recordings. Neither crackle only (no wheeze) (aOR: 2.13, 95% CI: 0.91, 4.96) or any wheeze (with or without crackle) (aOR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.34, 1.15) were associated with radiographic pneumonia. Among children with WHO danger signs no lung recording classification was independently associated with radiographic pneumonia, although trends toward greater odds of radiographic pneumonia were observed among children classified with crackle only (no wheeze) or any wheeze (with or without crackle). Among children without WHO danger signs, those with recorded wheezing had a lower case fatality than those without wheezing (3.8% vs. 9.1%, p = .03).
Among lower risk children without WHO danger signs digitally recorded wheezing is associated with a lower odds for radiographic pneumonia and with lower mortality. Although further research is needed, these data indicate that with further development digital auscultation may eventually contribute to child pneumonia care.
在中低收入国家,数字记录的肺部声音是否与放射影像学肺炎或临床结局相关尚不清楚。我们试图解决这些知识空白。
我们招募了来自非洲和亚洲 6 个国家的 8 个肺炎病因学研究用于儿童健康的研究点的 1 至 59 月龄因肺炎住院的儿童,记录数字听诊器肺部声音,获取胸部 X 光片,并收集临床结局。记录被处理并分类为正或负的间质性肺部声音。听诊和阅读小组对记录和 X 光片进行分类。评估记录分类与世界卫生组织(WHO)定义的主要终点肺炎(放射影像学肺炎)或死亡率之间的关联。我们还研究了风险分层的病死率。
在没有 WHO 危险体征的儿童中,与正常记录的儿童相比,喘鸣(无爆裂声)的放射影像学肺炎的校正比值比(aOR)较低(0.35,95%置信区间[CI]:0.15,0.82)。仅爆裂声(无喘鸣)(aOR:2.13,95%CI:0.91,4.96)或任何喘鸣(有或无爆裂声)(aOR:0.63,95%CI:0.34,1.15)均与放射影像学肺炎无关。在有 WHO 危险体征的儿童中,没有一种肺部记录分类与放射影像学肺炎独立相关,但观察到仅爆裂声(无喘鸣)或任何喘鸣(有或无爆裂声)的儿童发生放射影像学肺炎的可能性更大。在没有 WHO 危险体征的儿童中,记录有喘鸣的儿童的病死率低于没有喘鸣的儿童(3.8% vs. 9.1%,p=0.03)。
在风险较低的没有 WHO 危险体征的儿童中,数字记录的喘鸣与放射影像学肺炎的几率降低和死亡率降低相关。尽管还需要进一步研究,但这些数据表明,随着进一步的发展,数字听诊可能最终有助于儿童肺炎的护理。