INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Institut Mines-Telecom Business School, Evry, France.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0238229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238229. eCollection 2020.
This paper examines the role of gender in the formation of research collaboration networks, by investigating the composition of networks through connections to diverse professional communities. Drawing on an ego network approach, we examine gender differences among researchers' networks in terms of partner diversity, openness and brokerage roles. We use data from 897 valid responses to a questionnaire administered to biomedical scientists in Spain, which enquired into multiple aspects of personal research networks. Our findings show that women form more diverse networks and brokerage triads than men. This result is reinforced if we consider the most heterogeneous brokerage triads in terms of professional differences among network partners (i.e., consultant and liaison). Our results suggest that women are more likely to access non-redundant knowledge and richer research perspectives via their knowledge-flow intermediary roles. This research suggests the need for analyses of gender and networks that go beyond a gender-to-gender approach.
本文通过考察通过与不同专业社区的联系形成的网络结构,探讨了性别在研究合作网络形成中的作用。本研究采用自我中心网络方法,从伙伴多样性、网络开放性和中介作用等方面考察了研究人员网络中的性别差异。我们使用了 897 份有效问卷的数据,这些问卷是针对西班牙生物医学科学家进行的,调查了个人研究网络的多个方面。研究结果表明,与男性相比,女性形成的网络伙伴多样性更多,中介作用也更强。如果我们考虑网络伙伴之间(即顾问和联络人)专业差异最大的最异构的中介作用三方组合,这一结果则更为明显。研究结果表明,女性更有可能通过其知识中介作用获得非冗余知识和更丰富的研究视角。本研究表明,需要超越性别对性别方法的分析来研究性别和网络。