Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Department of Paraclinical Studies, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Vet Med Sci. 2021 Jan;7(1):112-121. doi: 10.1002/vms3.334. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance is a critical component of the "Global Action Plan" to tackle antimicrobial resistance. However, there is a paucity of such surveillance in communal farming areas in South Africa. This study investigated knowledge and antimicrobial use practices by cattle farmers and antimicrobial resistance levels of indicator bacteria in cattle in a rural communal farming area in South Africa. Seventy (70) farmers were interviewed at five cattle inspection sites using structured questionnaires. Rectal swabs were collected from apparently healthy cattle (n = 100) for culture of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus species, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using broth microdilution. The farmers indicated predominantly using tetracyclines. Although 42% of the farmers indicated hearing about antimicrobial resistance, none of them clearly understood what it involves. Seventy-nine (79) E. coli and 71 Enterococcus species were isolated with E. faecium being the dominant species among the Enterococcus isolates. E. coli isolates were resistant to colistin (16%; 13/79), chlortetracycline (8%; 6/79) and amoxicillin (8%; 6/79). Enterococcus isolates were resistant to enrofloxacin (55%; 39/71) and amoxycillin (3%; 2/71). We observed knowledge gaps in prudent antimicrobial use practices and antimicrobial resistance among the farmers. Farmer tailored education programmes on primary animal health care and prudent antimicrobial use practices must be developed and implemented to improve antimicrobial stewardship among farmers with limited veterinary supervision. The level of colistin resistance detected among E. coli isolates from rural communal cattle in this study was unexpected and warrants further molecular investigation to check if the resistance is plasmid mediated.
监测抗菌药物的使用和耐药性是应对抗菌药物耐药性的“全球行动计划”的一个关键组成部分。然而,在南非的集体农业区,这种监测非常缺乏。本研究调查了南非农村集体农业区的牛养殖户的知识和抗菌药物使用情况以及牛中指示菌的抗菌药物耐药水平。在五个牛检查点,使用结构化问卷对 70 名农民进行了采访。从看似健康的牛(n=100)中采集直肠拭子进行培养,以分离大肠杆菌和肠球菌属,并使用肉汤微量稀释法进行抗菌药物敏感性试验。农民主要使用四环素。尽管 42%的农民表示听说过抗菌药物耐药性,但他们都没有清楚地了解其含义。分离出 79 株大肠杆菌和 71 株肠球菌,肠球菌分离株中以屎肠球菌为主。大肠杆菌分离株对黏菌素(16%;13/79)、金霉素(8%;6/79)和阿莫西林(8%;6/79)耐药。肠球菌分离株对恩诺沙星(55%;39/71)和阿莫西林(3%;2/71)耐药。我们观察到农民在合理使用抗菌药物方面存在知识差距和抗菌药物耐药性。必须制定和实施针对初级动物保健和合理使用抗菌药物的农民量身定制的教育计划,以改善兽医监督有限的农民的抗菌药物管理。本研究中从农村集体牛中分离出的大肠杆菌对黏菌素的耐药率出乎意料,需要进一步进行分子调查,以检查这种耐药性是否是质粒介导的。