Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, 1211 Genève, Switzerland.
European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Cell Biology and Biophysics, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Mol Biol Cell. 2020 Sep 1;31(19):2093-2096. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E19-04-0189.
Superresolution microscopy is becoming increasingly widespread in biological labs. While it holds enormous potential for biological discovery, it is a complex imaging technique that requires thorough optimization of various experimental parameters to yield data of the highest quality. Unfortunately, it remains challenging even for seasoned users to judge from the acquired images alone whether their superresolution microscopy pipeline is performing at its optimum, or if the image quality could be improved. Here, we describe how superresolution microscopists can objectively characterize their imaging pipeline using suitable reference standards, which are stereotypic so that the same structure can be imaged everywhere, every time, on every microscope. Quantitative analysis of reference standard images helps characterizing the performance of one's own microscopes over time, allows objective benchmarking of newly developed microscopy and labeling techniques, and finally increases comparability of superresolution microscopy data between labs.
超分辨率显微镜在生物实验室中越来越普及。虽然它在生物发现方面具有巨大的潜力,但它是一种复杂的成像技术,需要对各种实验参数进行彻底的优化,以获得最高质量的数据。不幸的是,即使是经验丰富的用户,也很难仅凭获取的图像判断他们的超分辨率显微镜是否处于最佳状态,或者图像质量是否可以得到改善。在这里,我们描述了超分辨率显微镜专家如何使用合适的参考标准客观地描述他们的成像过程,这些参考标准是标准的,以便在每台显微镜上的任何位置、任何时间都可以对相同的结构进行成像。对参考标准图像的定量分析有助于随着时间的推移描述自己显微镜的性能,允许对新开发的显微镜和标记技术进行客观的基准测试,最终增加实验室之间超分辨率显微镜数据的可比性。