• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国阿拉巴马州的非裔美国(黑人)和白人妇女在诊断时的不同阶段宫颈癌的 5 年相对生存率的种族差异。

Racial differences in 5-year relative survival rates of cervical cancer by stage at diagnosis, between African American (black) and white women, living in the state of Alabama, USA.

机构信息

Department of Graduate Public Health (College of Veterinary Medicine), Tuskegee University, 1200 W Montgomery Rd, Tuskegee, AL, 36088, USA.

Biology Department (College of Arts and Sciences), Tuskegee University, 1200 W Montgomery Rd, Tuskegee, AL, 36088, USA.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07338-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-020-07338-7
PMID:32873252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7465406/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to assess racial differences in the 5-year relative survival rates (RSRs) of Cervical Cancer (CerCancer) by stage at diagnosis, between Black and White women, living in Alabama, USA.

METHODS

Data for 3484 Blacks and 21,059 Whites diagnosed with CerCancer were extracted from the 2004 to 2013 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We incorporated age groups, CerCancer stages, county, and year of diagnosis to compare the RSR between Blacks and Whites, using SEER*Stat software.

RESULTS

In urban, Black Belt (BB) and other rural counties, Whites diagnosed with localized stage of CerCancer always had better chances of survival because their RSRs were always more than 77%, compared to Blacks. Only exception was in Blacks living in other rural counties, who had a significantly higher RSR of 83.8% (95% Cl, 74.2-90.1). Which was the same as in Whites (83.8% (95% CI 74.5-89.9) living in BBC. Although, in other rural counties, Whites had a slightly lower RSR of 83.7% (95% CI 79.9-86.8%), their RSR was better compared to Blacks and Whites living in BB and other rural counties who had slightly higher RSRs of 83.8%. This was due to statistical precision, which depended on their larger sample size and a lower variability therefore, more reliability resulting in a tighter confidence interval with a smaller margin of error. In all the three county groups, Whites 15-44 years old diagnosed with localized stage of CerCancer had a higher RSR of 93.6% (95% CI 91.4-95.2%) for those living in urban and BB counties, and 94.6% (95% CI 93.6-95.4) for those living in other rural counties. The only exception was in Blacks 65-74 years old living in other rural counties who had the highest RSR of 96.9% (95% Cl, 82.9-99.5). However, Whites were considered to have a better RSR. This was also due to the statistical precision as mentioned above.

CONCLUSION

There were significant racial differences in the RSRs of CerCancer. Overall, Black women experienced the worst RSRs compared to their White counterparts.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估美国阿拉巴马州黑人和白人女性宫颈癌(CerCancer)患者诊断时不同分期的 5 年相对生存率(RSR)的种族差异。

方法

从 2004 年至 2013 年的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中提取了 3484 名黑人患者和 21059 名白人患者的 CerCancer 数据。我们结合年龄组、CerCancer 分期、县和诊断年份,使用 SEER*Stat 软件比较了黑人和白人患者之间的 RSR。

结果

在城市、黑带(BB)和其他农村县,诊断为局限性 CerCancer 的白人患者的生存率总是更高,因为他们的 RSR 始终超过 77%,而黑人患者则低于 77%。唯一的例外是在其他农村县的黑人患者,他们的 RSR 显著更高,为 83.8%(95%Cl,74.2-90.1)。这与生活在黑带(BB)和其他农村县的白人患者的 RSR 相同,这些患者的 RSR 也为 83.8%(95%CI 74.5-89.9)。尽管其他农村县的白人患者的 RSR 略低,为 83.7%(95%CI 79.9-86.8%),但与生活在 BB 和其他农村县的黑人患者相比,他们的 RSR 更好,这些患者的 RSR 略高,为 83.8%。这是由于统计学精度所致,统计学精度取决于较大的样本量和较小的变异性,从而提高了可靠性,导致置信区间更紧,误差幅度更小。在这三个县组中,诊断为局限性 CerCancer 的 15-44 岁白人患者的 RSR 更高,城市和 BB 县的 RSR 为 93.6%(95%CI 91.4-95.2%),其他农村县的 RSR 为 94.6%(95%CI 93.6-95.4%)。唯一的例外是 65-74 岁的黑人患者,他们的 RSR 最高,为 96.9%(95%Cl,82.9-99.5%)。然而,白人患者被认为具有更好的 RSR。这也是由于上述统计学精度所致。

结论

宫颈癌患者的 RSR 存在显著的种族差异。总体而言,与白人患者相比,黑人女性的 RSR 最差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcf9/7465406/fb6f51cc5461/12885_2020_7338_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcf9/7465406/b5fe21a1f010/12885_2020_7338_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcf9/7465406/d373a9f8b848/12885_2020_7338_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcf9/7465406/2d8cf16344c8/12885_2020_7338_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcf9/7465406/2da4fe0c33c5/12885_2020_7338_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcf9/7465406/fb6f51cc5461/12885_2020_7338_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcf9/7465406/b5fe21a1f010/12885_2020_7338_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcf9/7465406/d373a9f8b848/12885_2020_7338_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcf9/7465406/2d8cf16344c8/12885_2020_7338_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcf9/7465406/2da4fe0c33c5/12885_2020_7338_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcf9/7465406/fb6f51cc5461/12885_2020_7338_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Racial differences in 5-year relative survival rates of cervical cancer by stage at diagnosis, between African American (black) and white women, living in the state of Alabama, USA.美国阿拉巴马州的非裔美国(黑人)和白人妇女在诊断时的不同阶段宫颈癌的 5 年相对生存率的种族差异。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07338-7.
2
Disparities in Cervical Cancer Treatment Options between African American (Black) and White Women in Alabama.阿拉巴马州非裔美国(黑人)女性和白人女性在宫颈癌治疗选择上的差异。
J Healthc Sci Humanit. 2020 Fall;10(1):61-83.
3
The Impact of Race and Geographical Location on the Treatment Options of Cervical Cancer in Black and White Women Living in the State of Alabama.种族和地理位置对阿拉巴马州黑人和白人女性宫颈癌治疗方案的影响。
J Healthc Sci Humanit. 2020 Fall;10(1):40-60.
4
Urban/rural patterns in receipt of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer among black and white Medicare beneficiaries, 2000-2003.2000-2003 年,医疗保险受益的黑人和白人非小细胞肺癌患者接受治疗的城乡模式。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Aug;103(8):711-8. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30410-7.
5
Assessment of Racial Disparities in Mortality Rates Among Older Adults Living in US Rural vs Urban Counties From 1968 to 2016.评估 1968 年至 2016 年美国农村与城市县老年人死亡率的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012241. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12241.
6
Urban-rural differences in pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011-2016.城乡间与妊娠相关的死亡差异,美国,2011-2016 年。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):183.e1-183.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.028. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
7
Inequality in Female Breast Cancer Relative Survival Rates between White and Black Women in the United States.美国白人和黑人女性乳腺癌相对生存率的不平等。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02079-w.
8
Rural-Urban and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Invasive Cervical Cancer Incidence in the United States, 2010-2014.2010-2014 年美国农村-城市和种族/民族间浸润性宫颈癌发病率的差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jun 6;16:E70. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180447.
9
Cancer incidence among predominantly black, rural-poor populations in southern states.南部各州以黑人为主的农村贫困人口中的癌症发病率。
South Med J. 1997 Oct;90(10):986-92. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199710000-00004.
10
Rural-urban difference in female breast cancer diagnosis in Missouri.密苏里州女性乳腺癌诊断的城乡差异。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):3063. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity of the process and outcome specific measure in women with abnormal Papanicolaou screening test.巴氏涂片筛查异常的女性中特定过程和结果测量的有效性。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0325131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325131. eCollection 2025.
2
Structural Racism in Cervical Cancer Care and Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Inequities and Barriers.宫颈癌护理与生存结果中的结构性种族主义:对不平等与障碍的系统评价
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s40471-025-00360-y. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
3
Psychosocial Burden of Women Who Are to Undergo Additional Diagnostic Procedures Due to Positive Screening for Cervical Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparative Study of Health Disparities in Cervical Cancer Mortality Rates Through Time Between Black and Caucasian Women in Alabama and the US.阿拉巴马州及美国黑人和白人女性宫颈癌死亡率随时间变化的健康差异比较研究
Int J Stud Nurs. 2021 Mar;6(1):9-23. doi: 10.20849/ijsn.v6i1.864. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Cancer Patients' Survival: Standard Calculation Methods And Some Considerations Regarding Their Interpretation: POPULACIJSKO PREŽIVETJE BOLNIKOV Z RAKOM: UPORABA RAZLIČNIH PRISTOPOV IN PROBLEMI INTERPRETACIJE REZULTATOV.癌症患者的生存情况:标准计算方法及其解读的一些考量:癌症患者的人群生存率:不同方法的应用及结果解读问题
Zdr Varst. 2016 Feb 11;55(2):134-41. doi: 10.1515/sjph-2016-0012. eCollection 2016 Jun 1.
3
因宫颈癌筛查呈阳性而需接受额外诊断程序的女性的心理社会负担
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 20;16(20):3541. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203541.
4
Epidemiology of Cancer in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.老年人癌症的流行病学:系统综述。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Sep;26(9):1021-1046. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01567-w. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
5
Barriers to and opportunities for advancing racial equity in cervical cancer screening in the United States.推进美国宫颈癌筛查中种族公平的障碍和机遇。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03151-7.
6
Epidemiologic trends of and factors associated with overall survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors over the last two decades in the USA.美国过去二十年神经内分泌肿瘤患者的总体生存流行病学趋势及相关因素。
Endocr Connect. 2023 Nov 23;12(12). doi: 10.1530/EC-23-0331. Print 2023 Dec 1.
7
Effect Modification of Race on the Associated Tumor Size at Diagnosis and 10-Year Cancer Survival Rates in Women with Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the United States.种族对美国宫颈鳞状细胞癌女性诊断时相关肿瘤大小和 10 年癌症生存率的影响修饰。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 12;20(18):6742. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186742.
8
The Role of Conization before Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer including High Risk Factors of Recurrence: Propensity Score Matching.根治性子宫切除术前行宫颈锥切术在包含复发高危因素的宫颈癌中的作用:倾向评分匹配法
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 10;14(16):3863. doi: 10.3390/cancers14163863.
9
Box C/D snoRNA SNORD89 influences the occurrence and development of endometrial cancer through 2'-O-methylation modification of Bim.C/D 盒小核仁RNA SNORD89通过对Bim进行2'-O-甲基化修饰影响子宫内膜癌的发生发展。
Cell Death Discov. 2022 Jul 5;8(1):309. doi: 10.1038/s41420-022-01102-5.
10
Contemporary treatment patterns and survival of cervical cancer patients in Ethiopia.当代埃塞俄比亚宫颈癌患者的治疗模式和生存状况。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 13;21(1):1102. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08817-1.
Population-level trends in relative survival for cervical cancer.
宫颈癌相对生存率的人群水平趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):670.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
4
Cancer survival: an overview of measures, uses, and interpretation.癌症生存率:测量方法、用途及解读概述
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014 Nov;2014(49):145-86. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu024.
5
Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2013.美国非洲裔癌症统计数据,2013 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 May;63(3):151-66. doi: 10.3322/caac.21173. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
6
Effect of misclassified underlying cause of death on survival estimates of colon and rectal cancer.死亡根本原因错误分类对结肠癌和直肠癌生存估计的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 20;103(14):1130-3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr207. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
7
Cervical cancer prevention: new tools and old barriers.宫颈癌预防:新工具与旧障碍。
Cancer. 2010 Jun 1;116(11):2531-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25065.
8
Ethnic disparities in cervical cancer survival among Texas women.德克萨斯州妇女宫颈癌生存的种族差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Oct;18(10):1577-83. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1342.
9
Ethnic disparities in cervical cancer survival among Medicare eligible women in a multiethnic population.多民族人群中符合医疗保险资格女性宫颈癌生存率的种族差异。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Jan;19(1):13-20. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e318197f343.
10
Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD).五大洲的癌症生存率:一项基于全球人群的研究(CONCORD)
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Aug;9(8):730-56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70179-7. Epub 2008 Jul 17.