Institute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation and Research Institute of Molecular Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Austria.
Chair of Exercise Biology, Technical University of Munich, Austria.
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Aug 13;19(3):460-468. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Sedentary lifestyle predisposes to endothelial dysfunction, increased arterial stiffness and cardiovascular diseases, all of which can be positively modified by regular physical exercise training. A decrease in physical activity during winter months coincides with higher rates of cardiovascular events. In order to identify winter sports suitable to overcome this seasonal exercise deficit and thus contribute to cardiovascular health, it was the aim of this study to compare immediate effects of cross-country skiing (XCS) and alpine skiing (AS) on arterial stiffness as an alternative to indoor cycling (IC). After baseline assessment, eighteen healthy subjects performed one session of XCS, AS, and IC in randomized order. Pulse wave analysis was conducted (Mobil-o-Graph) before and 10-min after exercise. Parameters of arterial stiffness and wave reflection were reduced after XCS and IC, but not after AS: central systolic blood pressure (IC: -8.0 ± 5.4 mmHg; p < 0.001), amplitude of the backward pressure wave (IC: -1.4 ± 2.7 mmHg; p < 0.05), reflection coefficient (XCS: -6.0 ± 7.8%; IC: -5.7 ± 8.1%; both p < 0.1), and pulse wave velocity (IC by -0.19 ± 0.27 m/s; p < 0.01). Higher exercise intensities correlated with greater reductions of arterial stiffness (all p < 0.05). Single sessions of XCS, IC but not AS led to comparable improvement in arterial stiffness, which was even more pronounced during higher exercise intensities. With regard to arterial stiffness, IC and XCS emerge as more effective to counteract the winter exercise deficit and thus the deleterious cardiovascular effects of a sedentary lifestyle.
久坐的生活方式易导致内皮功能障碍、动脉僵硬度增加和心血管疾病,所有这些都可以通过定期的体育锻炼来积极改善。冬季运动量减少与心血管事件发生率升高相一致。为了确定适合克服季节性运动不足的冬季运动项目,从而促进心血管健康,本研究旨在比较越野滑雪(XCS)和高山滑雪(AS)对动脉僵硬度的即时影响,作为室内自行车运动(IC)的替代方法。在基线评估后,18 名健康受试者以随机顺序分别进行了 XCS、AS 和 IC 的一次运动。在运动前和运动后 10 分钟进行脉搏波分析(Mobil-o-Graph)。XCS 和 IC 后动脉僵硬度和波反射的参数降低,但 AS 后没有降低:中心收缩压(IC:-8.0 ± 5.4mmHg;p<0.001)、反向压力波幅度(IC:-1.4 ± 2.7mmHg;p<0.05)、反射系数(XCS:-6.0 ± 7.8%;IC:-5.7 ± 8.1%;均 p<0.1)和脉搏波速度(IC 降低 0.19 ± 0.27m/s;p<0.01)。较高的运动强度与动脉僵硬度的更大降低相关(均 p<0.05)。单次 XCS、IC 运动但不是 AS 运动可导致动脉僵硬度的相似改善,在更高的运动强度下甚至更为明显。在动脉僵硬度方面,IC 和 XCS 比 AS 更有效,可对抗冬季运动不足,从而抵消久坐生活方式的有害心血管影响。