• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

漱口水对含有嗜酸乳杆菌的实验性口腔生物膜的影响。

Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms.

作者信息

Jiang Qingru, Kainulainen Veera, Stamatova Iva, Janket Sok-Ja, Meurman Jukka H, Korpela Riitta

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00100 Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2020 Sep 1;8(3):96. doi: 10.3390/dj8030096.

DOI:10.3390/dj8030096
PMID:32882798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7560143/
Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of mouthwashes on oral biofilms with probiotics, we compared in biofilms the susceptibility to mouthwashes of probiotic GG (LGG) and oral pathogens , , and . We also evaluated these pathogens' susceptibility to the mouthwashes and their recovery after mouthwash-rinsing in biofilms with/without LGG. First, 1-day-/3-day-old LGG-integrated multi-species biofilms were exposed for 1 min to mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine, essential oils, or amine fluoride/stannous fluoride. Cells were plate-counted and relative survival rates (RSRs) of LGG and pathogens calculated. Second, 1-day-/3-day-old multispecies biofilms with and without LGG were exposed for 1 min to mouthwashes; cells were plate-counted and the pathogens' RSRs were calculated. Third, 1-day-old biofilms were treated for 1 min with mouthwashes. Cells were plate-counted immediately and after 2-day cultivation. Recovery rates of pathogens were calculated and compared between biofilms with/without LGG. Live/Dead staining served for structural analyses. Our results showed that RSRs of LGG were insignificantly smaller than those of pathogens in both 1-day and 3-day biofilms. No significant differences appeared in pathogens' RSRs and recovery rates after treatment between biofilms with/without LGG. To conclude, biofilm LGG was susceptible to the mouthwashes; but biofilm LGG altered neither the mouthwash effects on oral pathogens nor affected their recovery.

摘要

为了研究含益生菌的漱口水对口腔生物膜的影响,我们在生物膜中比较了益生菌GG(LGG)和口腔病原体、、和对漱口水的敏感性。我们还评估了这些病原体对漱口水的敏感性以及在含/不含LGG的生物膜中漱口水冲洗后它们的恢复情况。首先,将1日龄/3日龄整合LGG的多物种生物膜暴露于含氯己定、精油或胺氟化物/氟化亚锡的漱口水1分钟。对细胞进行平板计数并计算LGG和病原体的相对存活率(RSR)。其次,将含和不含LGG的1日龄/3日龄多物种生物膜暴露于漱口水1分钟;对细胞进行平板计数并计算病原体的RSR。第三,用漱口水处理1日龄生物膜1分钟。立即和培养2天后对细胞进行平板计数。计算病原体的恢复率并比较含/不含LGG的生物膜之间的差异。采用活/死染色进行结构分析。我们的结果表明,在1日龄和3日龄生物膜中,LGG的RSR均略小于病原体的RSR。含/不含LGG的生物膜在处理后病原体的RSR和恢复率没有显著差异。总之,生物膜LGG对漱口水敏感;但生物膜LGG既不改变漱口水对口腔病原体的作用,也不影响它们的恢复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d65d/7560143/db810bcd3e4d/dentistry-08-00096-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d65d/7560143/f96eedf6a143/dentistry-08-00096-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d65d/7560143/c01806593d69/dentistry-08-00096-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d65d/7560143/af36e2a2e56d/dentistry-08-00096-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d65d/7560143/50bd9dff5a87/dentistry-08-00096-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d65d/7560143/db810bcd3e4d/dentistry-08-00096-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d65d/7560143/f96eedf6a143/dentistry-08-00096-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d65d/7560143/c01806593d69/dentistry-08-00096-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d65d/7560143/af36e2a2e56d/dentistry-08-00096-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d65d/7560143/50bd9dff5a87/dentistry-08-00096-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d65d/7560143/db810bcd3e4d/dentistry-08-00096-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms.漱口水对含有嗜酸乳杆菌的实验性口腔生物膜的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Sep 1;8(3):96. doi: 10.3390/dj8030096.
2
Efficacy of an alcohol-free CPC-containing mouthwash against oral multispecies biofilms.不含酒精的含西吡氯铵漱口水对口腔多种细菌生物膜的疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2011;22(6):187-94.
3
Effect of mouthwashes on the composition and metabolic activity of oral biofilms grown in vitro.漱口水对体外培养的口腔生物膜组成及代谢活性的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1221-1230. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1876-2. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
4
Comparative effect of a stannous fluoride toothpaste and a sodium fluoride toothpaste on a multispecies biofilm.含氟牙膏和含氟牙膏对多物种生物膜的比较效果。 你提供的原文中两个“toothpaste”都应该是不同成分的牙膏,前面一个可能是“氟化亚锡牙膏”,后面一个是“氟化钠牙膏”,我按照纠正后的意思翻译了,你可以根据实际情况调整。 正确的原文应该是:Comparative effect of a stannous fluoride toothpaste and a sodium fluoride toothpaste on a multispecies biofilm. 翻译为:氟化亚锡牙膏和氟化钠牙膏对多物种生物膜的比较效果。
Arch Oral Biol. 2017 Feb;74:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
5
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in Experimental Oral Biofilms Exposed to Different Carbohydrate Sources.鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG 在暴露于不同碳水化合物来源的实验性口腔生物膜中的作用。
Caries Res. 2018;52(3):220-229. doi: 10.1159/000479380. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
6
In vitro effects of commercial mouthwashes on several virulence traits of Candida albicans, viridans streptococci and Enterococcus faecalis colonizing the oral cavity.体外研究商业漱口水对几种口腔定植的白色念珠菌、草绿色链球菌和粪肠球菌毒力特性的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 15;13(11):e0207262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207262. eCollection 2018.
7
Candida albicans survival, growth and biofilm formation are differently affected by mouthwashes: an in vitro study.漱口水对白色念珠菌的存活、生长和生物膜形成有不同影响:一项体外研究
New Microbiol. 2017 Jan;40(1):45-52.
8
A comprehensive study into the impact of a chitosan mouthwash upon oral microorganism's biofilm formation in vitro.一项关于壳聚糖漱口水对体外口腔微生物生物膜形成影响的综合研究。
Carbohydr Polym. 2014 Jan 30;101:1081-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.041. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
9
High-Velocity Microsprays Enhance Antimicrobial Activity in Streptococcus mutans Biofilms.高速微喷雾增强变形链球菌生物膜中的抗菌活性。
J Dent Res. 2016 Dec;95(13):1494-1500. doi: 10.1177/0022034516662813. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on saliva-derived microcosms.鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG 对唾液衍生微宇宙的影响。
Arch Oral Biol. 2011 Feb;56(2):136-47. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.09.019. Epub 2010 Oct 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Determining the antibacterial substantivity of Triphala mouthwash and comparing it with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate after a single oral rinse: A crossover clinical trial.单次口腔冲洗后测定三果口洗药水的抗菌持续性并与0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定作比较:一项交叉临床试验。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2018 Nov-Dec;22(6):498-502. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_265_18.
2
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in Experimental Oral Biofilms Exposed to Different Carbohydrate Sources.鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG 在暴露于不同碳水化合物来源的实验性口腔生物膜中的作用。
Caries Res. 2018;52(3):220-229. doi: 10.1159/000479380. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
3
Inter-personal diversity and temporal dynamics of dental, tongue, and salivary microbiota in the healthy oral cavity.
健康口腔中牙齿、舌头和唾液微生物群的人际多样性和时间动态变化。
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2017 Jan 26;3:2. doi: 10.1038/s41522-016-0011-0. eCollection 2017.
4
The association between oral hygiene and periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.口腔卫生与牙周炎的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Dent J. 2017 Dec;67(6):332-343. doi: 10.1111/idj.12317. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
5
Understanding the Mechanism of Bacterial Biofilms Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents.了解细菌生物膜对抗菌剂的耐药机制。
Open Microbiol J. 2017 Apr 28;11:53-62. doi: 10.2174/1874285801711010053. eCollection 2017.
6
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Probiotic, Herbal and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash on Gingival Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial.益生菌、草药和洗必泰漱口水对牙龈健康功效的比较评估:一项随机临床试验
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZC13-ZC16. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23891.9462. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
7
Prevention of dental caries: A review of effective treatments.龋齿的预防:有效治疗方法综述
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Dec 1;8(5):e604-e610. doi: 10.4317/jced.52890. eCollection 2016 Dec.
8
Mouthwashes in the 21 century: a narrative review about active molecules and effectiveness on the periodontal outcomes.21世纪的漱口水:关于活性分子及其对牙周结局有效性的叙述性综述
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2017 Aug;14(8):973-982. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2017.1260118. Epub 2016 Nov 20.
9
Interactions between Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and oral micro-organisms in an in vitro biofilm model.鼠李糖乳杆菌GG与口腔微生物在体外生物膜模型中的相互作用。
BMC Microbiol. 2016 Jul 12;16(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0759-7.
10
Effect of Toothbrushing Frequency on Incidence and Increment of Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.刷牙频率对龋齿发生率和增量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Dent Res. 2016 Oct;95(11):1230-6. doi: 10.1177/0022034516655315. Epub 2016 Jun 22.