Asefa Anteneh, Morgan Alison, Gebremedhin Samson, Tekle Ephrem, Abebe Sintayehu, Magge Hema, Kermode Michelle
School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e038871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038871.
There is a lack of evidence on approaches to mitigating mistreatment during facility-based childbirth. This study compares the experiences of mistreatment reported by childbearing women before and after implementation of a respectful maternity care intervention.
A pre-post study design was undertaken to quantify changes in women's experiences of mistreatment during facility-based childbirth before and after the respectful maternity care intervention.
A respectful maternity care intervention was implemented in three hospitals in southern Ethiopia between December 2017 and September 2018 and it included training of service providers, placement of wall posters in labour rooms and post-training supportive visits for quality improvement.
A 25-item questionnaire asking women about mistreatment experiences was administered to 388 women (198 in the pre-intervention, 190 in the post-intervention). The outcome variable was the number of mistreatment components experienced by women, expressed as a score out of 25. Multilevel mixed-effects Poisson modelling was used to assess the change in mistreatment score from pre-intervention to post-intervention periods.
The number of mistreatment components experienced by women was reduced by 18% when the post-intervention group was compared with the pre-intervention group (adjusted regression coefficient (Aβ)=0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91). Women who had a complication during pregnancy (Aβ=1.17, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.34) and childbirth (Aβ=1.16, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.32) experienced a greater number of mistreatment components. On the other hand, women who gave birth by caesarean birth after trial of vaginal birth (Aβ=0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.92) and caesarean birth without trial of vaginal birth (Aβ=0.68, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.98) experienced a lesser number of mistreatment components compared with those who had vaginal birth.
Women reported significantly fewer mistreatment experiences during childbirth following implementation of the intervention. Given the variety of factors that lead to mistreatment in health facilities, interventions designed to mitigate mistreatment need to involve structural changes.
缺乏关于在医疗机构分娩期间减轻虐待行为方法的证据。本研究比较了实施尊重产妇护理干预前后生育妇女报告的虐待经历。
采用前后对照研究设计,以量化在尊重产妇护理干预前后妇女在医疗机构分娩期间虐待经历的变化。
2017年12月至2018年9月期间,在埃塞俄比亚南部的三家医院实施了尊重产妇护理干预,包括对服务提供者的培训、在产房张贴墙报以及培训后进行支持性访问以改进质量。
对388名妇女(干预前198名,干预后190名)进行了一项包含25个项目的问卷调查,询问妇女的虐待经历。结局变量是妇女经历的虐待行为组成部分的数量,以25分制表示。采用多水平混合效应泊松模型评估干预前到干预后期间虐待得分的变化。
与干预前组相比,干预后组妇女经历的虐待行为组成部分数量减少了18%(调整回归系数(Aβ)=0.82,95%置信区间0.74至0.91)。孕期(Aβ=1.17,95%置信区间1.01至1.34)和分娩期(Aβ=1.16,95%置信区间1.03至1.32)出现并发症的妇女经历的虐待行为组成部分更多。另一方面,与经阴道试产后剖宫产(Aβ=0.76,95%置信区间0.63至0.92)和未经阴道试产直接剖宫产(Aβ=0.68,95%置信区间0.47至0.98)的妇女相比,经阴道分娩的妇女经历的虐待行为组成部分更少。
干预实施后,妇女报告的分娩期间虐待经历显著减少。鉴于导致医疗机构虐待行为的因素多种多样,旨在减轻虐待行为的干预措施需要涉及结构性变革。