• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯人群中抗磷脂综合征的临床和实验室表现特征:检验札幌标准的适用性。

The clinical and laboratory manifestations profile of antiphospholipid syndrome among Saudi Arabia population: Examining the applicability of Sapporo criteria.

作者信息

Algahtani Farjah H, AlQahtany Fatmah S, ElGohary Ghada, Alsharidi Aynaa, Sayeeda Afsar, AlArfaj Hussein, Gamal Ahmed Y

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology/Hematology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Pathology, Hematopathology Unit, College of Medicine, King Saud University, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 Sep;27(9):2425-2430. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.05.037. Epub 2020 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.05.037
PMID:32884425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7451729/
Abstract

Antiphospholipid syndrome is a organized autoimmune disease presented with vascular thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. The Sapporo classification criteria of APS were revised in 2006 and are used as the main diagnosis guideline, which validity as standard measurements is still in debate. This study observe the clinical and laboratory indices of APS among Saudi patients. This is a retrospective study hospital-based population. The clinical and Laboratory manifestations of diagnosed APS patients from electronical medical records identifies by ICD-9 code 795.79 in the King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 1990 and 2012. We selected patients with ICD-9 code 795.79 as. Sapporo criteria applied to all patients, then divided into cases fulfilled criteria and cases failed the criteria. To notice the difference in clinical and laboratory indices and comorbidities between the two groups, the T-test was performed and Logistic regression for the fulfilled criteria and clinical indices of vascular thrombosis, DVT/PE, recurrent, and pregnancy morbidity. A total of 72 (90%) females and 8 (10%) males, with the female-to-male ratio 9:1. The mean (±SD) age at diagnosis was 28.1 (±8.7) years (range 11-63 years). There were 22 patients (27.5%) attained the revised criteria (APS confirmed) and no significant difference between the two groups was observed (p > 0.2). However, we found Sapporo confirmed APS cases had significantly higher percentage of serological manifestation presence than clinically diagnosed APS cases. Though there is no statistically significance, Sapporo confirmed APS cases had advanced odds of undergoing vascular thrombosis (OR = 1.61, 95%CI) and DVT/PE (OR = 1.53, 95%CI) and lesser odds of undergoing recurrent DVT/PE (OR = 0.67, 95%CI) and pregnancy morbidity (OR = 0.63, 95%CI) than the clinically diagnosed APS cases. Over 70% of the study population with diagnosed APS did not accomplish the revised Sapporo criteria due to negative laboratory manifestations, which reflects heterogeneous but not degreed disease severity profiles.

摘要

抗磷脂综合征是一种伴有血管血栓形成和妊娠并发症的系统性自身免疫性疾病。2006年修订了抗磷脂综合征的札幌分类标准,并将其用作主要诊断指南,但其作为标准测量方法的有效性仍存在争议。本研究观察了沙特患者中抗磷脂综合征的临床和实验室指标。这是一项基于医院人群的回顾性研究。通过沙特阿拉伯利雅得国王沙特大学医学城1990年至2012年间电子病历中ICD - 9编码795.79确定诊断为抗磷脂综合征患者的临床和实验室表现。我们选择ICD - 9编码795.79的患者作为研究对象。将札幌标准应用于所有患者,然后分为符合标准的病例和不符合标准的病例。为了观察两组之间临床和实验室指标及合并症的差异,进行了t检验,并对符合标准的病例以及血管血栓形成、深静脉血栓形成/肺栓塞、复发性和妊娠并发症的临床指标进行了逻辑回归分析。共有72名(90%)女性和8名(10%)男性,男女比例为9:1。诊断时的平均(±标准差)年龄为28.1(±8.7)岁(范围11 - 63岁)。有22名患者(27.5%)符合修订标准(抗磷脂综合征确诊),两组之间未观察到显著差异(p>0.2)。然而,我们发现札幌确诊的抗磷脂综合征病例血清学表现阳性的百分比显著高于临床诊断的抗磷脂综合征病例。尽管无统计学意义,但札幌确诊的抗磷脂综合征病例发生血管血栓形成(OR = 1.61,95%CI)和深静脉血栓形成/肺栓塞(OR = 1.53,95%CI)的几率高于临床诊断的抗磷脂综合征病例,而复发性深静脉血栓形成/肺栓塞(OR = 0.67,95%CI)和妊娠并发症(OR = 0.63,95%CI)的几率低于临床诊断的抗磷脂综合征病例。超过70%诊断为抗磷脂综合征的研究人群因实验室表现阴性未达到修订的札幌标准,这反映了疾病严重程度的异质性而非程度差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd40/7451729/32d277766826/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd40/7451729/350b6e63dd6a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd40/7451729/32d277766826/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd40/7451729/350b6e63dd6a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd40/7451729/32d277766826/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
The clinical and laboratory manifestations profile of antiphospholipid syndrome among Saudi Arabia population: Examining the applicability of Sapporo criteria.沙特阿拉伯人群中抗磷脂综合征的临床和实验室表现特征:检验札幌标准的适用性。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 Sep;27(9):2425-2430. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.05.037. Epub 2020 May 29.
2
Assessment and comparison of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS criteria with the revised Sapporo criteria.评估和比较 2023 年 ACR/EULAR APS 标准与修订的 Sapporo 标准。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2024 May;27(5):e15175. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.15175.
3
Comparison of the 1999 Sapporo and 2006 revised criteria for the classification of the antiphospholipid syndrome.抗磷脂综合征分类的 1999 年札幌标准和 2006 年修订标准的比较。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009 Nov-Dec;27(6):914-9.
4
Assessment of the 2006 revised antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria.2006年修订的抗磷脂综合征分类标准评估
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jul;66(7):927-30. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.067314. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
5
A review of the sapporo and revised Sapporo criteria for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome. Where do the revised sapporo criteria add value?抗磷脂综合征分类的札幌标准及修订版札幌标准综述。修订版札幌标准的价值体现在何处?
J Rheumatol. 2007 Jul;34(7):1522-7. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
6
Diagnosis and management of non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.非标准型产科抗磷脂综合征的诊断与管理
Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jan;113(1):13-9. doi: 10.1160/TH14-05-0416. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
7
The 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria identify patients at high risk of complications.2023 年 ACR/EULAR 抗磷脂综合征分类标准确定了具有高并发症风险的患者。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Nov;43(11):3373-3377. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07144-7. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
8
Antiphospholipid Syndrome: To Classify or Not to Classify?抗磷脂综合征:分类与否?
Turk J Haematol. 2024 Mar 1;41(1):37-40. doi: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2024.2024.0003. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
9
Demographic, Clinical, and Serological Characteristics of Antiphospholipid Syndrome Patients From the Anticoagulation Clinic of Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación, Medellín, Colombia.来自哥伦比亚麦德林市圣维森特基金会大学医院抗凝门诊的抗磷脂综合征患者的人口统计学、临床和血清学特征。
Cureus. 2023 Feb 17;15(2):e35114. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35114. eCollection 2023 Feb.
10
Diagnosis and classification of the antiphospholipid syndrome.抗磷脂综合征的诊断和分类。
J Autoimmun. 2014 Feb-Mar;48-49:20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Immunologic Manifestations of Antiphospholipid Syndrome Among Patients in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城(KAMC)患者中抗磷脂综合征的临床和免疫表现
Cureus. 2025 Jan 1;17(1):e76720. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76720. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Antiphospholipid syndrome.抗磷脂综合征。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;30(1):133-48. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 4.
2
Antiphospholipid syndrome.抗磷脂综合征。
Lancet. 2010 Oct 30;376(9751):1498-509. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60709-X. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
3
Antiphospholipid syndrome. Current insights into laboratory diagnosis and pathophysiology.抗磷脂综合征。实验室诊断和病理生理学的最新认识。
Hamostaseologie. 2010 Aug;30(3):139-43.
4
The geoepidemiology of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.抗磷脂抗体综合征的地理流行病学。
Autoimmun Rev. 2010 Mar;9(5):A299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.11.013. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
5
A review of the sapporo and revised Sapporo criteria for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome. Where do the revised sapporo criteria add value?抗磷脂综合征分类的札幌标准及修订版札幌标准综述。修订版札幌标准的价值体现在何处?
J Rheumatol. 2007 Jul;34(7):1522-7. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
6
Clinical relevance of the recent update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: an obstetric medicine clinic series of 107 patients.近期抗磷脂综合征分类标准更新的临床相关性:107例患者的产科医学临床系列研究
J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Oct;4(10):2276-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02142.x. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
7
Revision of the Sapporo criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome-- coming to grips with evidence and Thomas Bayes?抗磷脂综合征札幌标准的修订——如何把握证据与托马斯·贝叶斯定理?
Thromb Haemost. 2006 Jun;95(6):917-9. doi: 10.1160/TH06-03-0132.
8
International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).关于明确抗磷脂综合征(APS)分类标准更新的国际共识声明。
J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Feb;4(2):295-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x.
9
Epidemiology of idiopathic cardiomyopathy in Qatar during 1996-2003.1996年至2003年卡塔尔特发性心肌病的流行病学情况
Med Princ Pract. 2006;15(1):56-61. doi: 10.1159/000089387.
10
Takayasu arteritis with high titre of antiphospholipid antibodies and MTHFR Polymorphism.伴有高滴度抗磷脂抗体和亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶基因多态性的高安动脉炎
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2005 Aug;20(1):47-50. doi: 10.1007/s11239-005-2459-2.