Suppr超能文献

小儿群体心肺适能的简单测试。

Simple tests of cardiorespiratory fitness in a pediatric population.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.

Division of Research, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 4;15(9):e0238863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238863. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

A progressive, treadmill-based VO2max is the gold standard of cardiorespiratory fitness determination but is rarely used in pediatric clinics due to time requirements and cost. Simpler and shorter fitness tests such as the Squat Test or Step Test may be feasible and clinically useful alternatives. However, performance comparisons of these tests to treadmill VO2max tests are lacking. The primary aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the correlation between Squat and Step Test scores and VO2max in a pediatric population. As secondary outcomes, we calculated correlations between Rated Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE) scores, NIH PROMIS Physical Activity scores, and BMI z-score with VO2max, and we also evaluated the ability of each fitness test to discriminate low and high-risk patients based on the FITNESSGram. Forty children aged 10-17 completed these simple cardiorespiratory fitness tests. Statistically significant correlations were observed between VO2max and the Step Test (r = -0.549) and Squat Test (r = -0.429) scores, as well as participant BMI z-score (r = -0.458). RPE and PROMIS scores were not observed to be correlated with VO2max. Area Under the Receiver Operator Curve was relatively high for BMI z-scores and the Step Test (AUC = 0.813, 0.713 respectively), and lower for the Squat Test (AUC = 0.610) in discriminating risk according to FITNESSGram Scores. In this sample, the Step Test performed best overall. These tests were safe, feasible, and may add great value in assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in a clinical setting.

摘要

一项基于跑步机的渐进式最大摄氧量测试是心肺功能测定的金标准,但由于时间和成本的要求,很少在儿科诊所使用。更简单、更短的体能测试,如深蹲测试或台阶测试,可能是可行的和具有临床意义的替代方法。然而,这些测试与跑步机最大摄氧量测试的性能比较却很少。本横断面研究的主要目的是评估儿童群体中深蹲和台阶测试评分与最大摄氧量之间的相关性。作为次要结果,我们计算了等级感知用力量表(RPE)评分、NIH PROMIS 体力活动评分和 BMI z 评分与最大摄氧量之间的相关性,还评估了每个体能测试根据 FITNESSGram 区分低危和高危患者的能力。40 名年龄在 10-17 岁的儿童完成了这些简单的心肺功能测试。最大摄氧量与台阶测试(r = -0.549)和深蹲测试(r = -0.429)评分以及参与者 BMI z 评分(r = -0.458)之间存在显著的相关性。RPE 和 PROMIS 评分与最大摄氧量之间没有相关性。BMI z 评分和台阶测试的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)相对较高(AUC = 0.813、0.713),而深蹲测试(AUC = 0.610)在根据 FITNESSGram 评分区分风险方面则较低。在本样本中,台阶测试总体表现最佳。这些测试安全、可行,在临床评估心肺功能方面可能具有重要价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3016/7473550/03225ab3512c/pone.0238863.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验