Dept. of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
neuroCare Group Netherlands, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102399. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102399. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
Quantitative Electroencephalogram-(QEEG-)informed neurofeedback is a method in which standard neurofeedback protocols are assigned, based on individual EEG characteristics in order to enhance effectiveness. Thus far clinical effectiveness data have only been published in a small sample of 21 ADHD patients. Therefore, this manuscript aims to replicate this effectiveness in a new sample of 114 patients treated with QEEG-informed neurofeedback, from a large multicentric dataset and to investigate potential predictors of neurofeedback response.
A sample of 114 patients were included as a replication sample. Patients were treated with standard neurofeedback protocols (Sensori-Motor-Rhythm (SMR), Theta-Beta (TBR), or Slow Cortical Potential (SCP) neurofeedback), in combination with coaching and sleep hygiene advice. The ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were assessed at baseline, every 10th session, and at outtake. Holland Sleep Disorder Questionnaire (HSDQ) was assessed at baseline and outtake. Response was defined as ≥25% reduction (R25), ≥50% reduction (R50), and remission. Predictive analyses were focused on predicting remission status.
In the current sample, response rates were 85% (R25), 70% (R50), and remission was 55% and clinical effectiveness was not significantly different from the original 2012 sample. Non-remitters exhibited significantly higher baseline hyperactivity ratings. Women who remitted had significantly shorter P300 latencies and boys who remitted had significantly lower iAPF's.
In the current sample, clinical effectiveness was replicated, suggesting it is possible to assign patients to a protocol based on their individual baseline QEEG to enhance signal-to-noise ratio. Furthermore, remitters had lower baseline hyperactivity scores. Likewise, female remitters had shorter P300 latencies, whereas boys who remitted have a lower iAPF. Our data suggests initial specificity in treatment allocation, yet further studies are needed to replicate the predictors of neurofeedback remission.
定量脑电图(QEEG)指导的神经反馈是一种方法,根据个体脑电图特征分配标准神经反馈方案,以提高效果。到目前为止,临床效果数据仅在 21 名 ADHD 患者的小样本中发表过。因此,本手稿旨在通过来自大型多中心数据集的 114 名接受 QEEG 指导的神经反馈治疗的新样本中复制这种效果,并研究神经反馈反应的潜在预测因素。
纳入 114 名患者作为复制样本。患者接受标准神经反馈方案(感觉运动节律(SMR)、theta-beta(TBR)或慢皮质电位(SCP)神经反馈),结合辅导和睡眠卫生建议。在基线、每 10 次治疗和治疗结束时,使用 ADHD 评定量表(ADHD-RS)和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)进行评估。在基线和治疗结束时使用荷兰睡眠障碍问卷(HSDQ)进行评估。反应定义为≥25%(R25)、≥50%(R50)和缓解。预测分析集中在预测缓解状态上。
在当前样本中,反应率为 85%(R25)、70%(R50),缓解率为 55%,临床疗效与 2012 年原始样本无显著差异。未缓解者的基线多动评分显著升高。缓解的女性 P300 潜伏期明显缩短,缓解的男孩 iAPF 明显降低。
在当前样本中,临床疗效得到了复制,这表明可以根据患者的个体基线 QEEG 为他们分配方案,以提高信噪比。此外,缓解者的基线多动评分较低。同样,缓解的女性 P300 潜伏期较短,而缓解的男孩 iAPF 较低。我们的数据表明治疗分配具有初始特异性,但需要进一步研究来复制神经反馈缓解的预测因素。