NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;40(2):429-434. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04031-2. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
Novel rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) offer huge potential to optimise clinical care and improve patient outcomes. In this study, we aim to assess the current patterns of use around the world, identify issues for successful implementation and suggest best practice advice on how to introduce new tests. An electronic survey was devised by the International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (ISAC) Rapid Diagnostics and Biomarkers working group focussing on the availability, structure and impact of RDTs around the world. It was circulated to ISAC members in December 2019. Results were collated according to the UN human development index (HDI). 81 responses were gathered from 31 different countries. 84% of institutions reported the availability of any test 24/7. In more developed countries, this was more for respiratory viruses, whereas in high and medium/low developed countries, it was for HIV and viral hepatitis. Only 37% of those carrying out rapid tests measured the impact. There is no 'one-size fits all' solution to RDTs: the requirements must be tailored to the healthcare setting in which they are deployed and there are many factors that should be considered prior to this.
新型快速诊断检测(RDT)具有优化临床护理和改善患者预后的巨大潜力。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估全球当前的使用模式,确定成功实施的问题,并就如何引入新检测提出最佳实践建议。国际抗菌化疗学会(ISAC)快速诊断和生物标志物工作组设计了一项电子调查,重点关注全球 RDT 的可用性、结构和影响。该调查于 2019 年 12 月分发给 ISAC 成员。结果根据联合国人类发展指数(HDI)进行了整理。从 31 个不同国家收集了 81 份回复。84%的机构报告称 24/7 可提供任何检测。在更发达的国家,这更多的是针对呼吸道病毒,而在高、中和低开发国家,这更多的是针对艾滋病毒和病毒性肝炎。只有 37%的进行快速检测的机构测量了其影响。RDT 没有“一刀切”的解决方案:必须根据部署它们的医疗保健环境来定制要求,在此之前,还有许多因素需要考虑。