Suppr超能文献

三种快速抗原检测试剂盒检测 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的分析灵敏度和临床灵敏度。

Analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity of the three rapid antigen detection kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.

机构信息

All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

All from Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104684. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104684. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous rapid antigen detection (RAD) kits for diagnosing COVID-19 patients are available in the market recently.

OBJECTIVE

To compare analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity for the three commercially available RAD kits.

STUDY DESIGN

Analytical sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus was determined by limit of detection (LOD) using RT-PCR as a reference method. Clinical sensitivity was evaluated by using respiratory specimens collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS

The LOD results showed that the three RAD kits varied from 10-10 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. Clinical sensitivity of RAD kits ranged from 22.9 %-71.4 % for detecting specimens from COVID-19 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although RAD kits were less sensitive than RT-PCR, understanding the clinical characteristics of different RAD kits can guide us to obtain suitable specimens for testing. The likelihood of positive results for RAD kits will be higher.

摘要

背景

目前市场上有许多用于诊断 COVID-19 患者的快速抗原检测 (RAD) 试剂盒。

目的

比较三种市售 RAD 试剂盒的分析灵敏度和临床灵敏度。

研究设计

采用 RT-PCR 作为参考方法,通过检测限 (LOD) 来确定 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的分析灵敏度。使用从确诊 COVID-19 患者采集的呼吸道标本评估临床灵敏度。

结果

LOD 结果表明,三种 RAD 试剂盒的灵敏度比 RT-PCR 低 10-10 倍。RAD 试剂盒检测 COVID-19 患者标本的临床灵敏度为 22.9%-71.4%。

结论

尽管 RAD 试剂盒的灵敏度低于 RT-PCR,但了解不同 RAD 试剂盒的临床特征可以指导我们获得适合检测的标本。RAD 试剂盒的阳性结果的可能性将会更高。

相似文献

5
Evaluation of automated antigen detection test for detection of SARS-CoV-2.评估自动化抗原检测试验以检测 SARS-CoV-2。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;101(4):115490. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115490. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
6
Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.SARS-CoV-2 病毒快速抗原检测评估。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104500. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104500. Epub 2020 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

10
Lateral Flow Immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2.用于检测新型冠状病毒的侧向流动免疫分析方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 18;12(11):2854. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112854.

本文引用的文献

3
A call for diagnostic tests to report viral load.呼吁诊断检测报告病毒载量。
Science. 2020 Oct 2;370(6512):22. doi: 10.1126/science.370.6512.22.
8
Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.SARS-CoV-2 病毒快速抗原检测评估。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104500. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104500. Epub 2020 Jun 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验