Schindler Elisabeth, Hohmann Carina, Culmsee Carsten
Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Department of Pharmacy, Klinikum Fulda gAG, Fulda, Germany.
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Aug 12;11:1176. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01176. eCollection 2020.
Most elderly patients with type 2 diabetes take multiple drugs. Earlier studies in other countries suggested that interdisciplinary medication reviews are beneficial for these patients regarding medication safety and therapy optimization. In Germany, medication reviews by community pharmacies are rarely performed, although it is a service stipulated in the "Apothekenbetriebsordnung" (rules governing the operation of pharmacies in Germany) since 2012. Therefore, the aim of the DIATHEM study (type 2 DIAbetes: optimizing THErapy by Medication review in community pharmacies) was to evaluate the impact of medication reviews from German community pharmacies under real-life conditions. Primary outcomes were: identification of drug related problems (DRPs) and to evaluate to what extent they could be solved by the medication review. Secondary outcomes were: evaluation of changes in the number of drugs and the interdisciplinary cooperation between pharmacists and physicians. In a single arm interventional study, 121 patients aged 65 or older with type 2 diabetes, taking at least five drugs for long-term treatment were provided with one medication review between February 2016 and April 2017. Physicians were not pre-informed about the review and neither patients nor physicians nor the 13 participating community pharmacies were reimbursed for their contributions to the study. For 121 patients, 586 DPRs were identified (4.84 DRPs per patient) of which 31.6% were related to the antidiabetics. Due to the medication review, 46.9% of these DRPs could be completely resolved, indicating a statistically significant decline from 4.84 DRPs to 2.57 DRPs per patient (p < 0.001). The average number of drugs was significantly reduced from 9.5 drugs (standard deviation, SD = 2.9) to 9.3 drugs (SD = 2.8) per patient (p < 0.001). The pharmacists received feedback for 76.7% of the intervention proposals sent to the physicians. In total 59.5% of the intervention proposals were accepted, of which 643 (85.3%) were accepted and fully implemented. In conclusion, the study shows that medication reviews performed by community pharmacists under routine care conditions reduced the frequency and number of DRPs, even though the pharmacies had to face obstacles such as lack of cooperation by the prescriber or lack of reimbursement.
大多数老年2型糖尿病患者服用多种药物。其他国家早期的研究表明,跨学科药物评估对于这些患者的用药安全和治疗优化有益。在德国,社区药房很少进行药物评估,尽管自2012年以来,这是《德国药房运营条例》(德国药房运营规则)规定的一项服务。因此,DIATHEM研究(2型糖尿病:通过社区药房药物评估优化治疗)的目的是评估德国社区药房在实际情况下进行药物评估的影响。主要结果是:识别与药物相关的问题(DRP),并评估通过药物评估能够解决这些问题的程度。次要结果是:评估药物数量的变化以及药剂师与医生之间的跨学科合作。在一项单臂干预研究中,2016年2月至2017年4月期间,为121名年龄在65岁及以上、患有2型糖尿病且长期服用至少五种药物的患者提供了一次药物评估。未提前告知医生此次评估,患者、医生以及13家参与研究的社区药房均未因参与该研究而获得补偿。对于121名患者,共识别出586个DRP(每位患者4.84个DRP),其中31.6%与抗糖尿病药物有关。由于进行了药物评估,这些DRP中有46.9%能够完全解决,这表明每位患者的DRP数量从4.84个显著下降至2.57个(p < 0.001)。每位患者的平均药物数量从9.5种(标准差,SD = 2.9)显著减少至9.3种(SD = 2.8)(p < 0.001)。药剂师收到了发送给医生的干预建议中76.7%的反馈。总共59.5%的干预建议被采纳,其中643条(85.3%)被接受并完全实施。总之,该研究表明,即使药房面临诸如开处方者缺乏合作或缺乏补偿等障碍,社区药剂师在常规护理条件下进行的药物评估仍能降低DRP的频率和数量。