Armagan Alpturker Kezban, Cerrahoglu Ayse Beyhan Lale, Orguc Ihsan Sebnem
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Celal Bayar University Medical School, Manisa, Turkey.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Celal Bayar University Medical School, Manisa, Turkey.
Int J Rheumatol. 2020 Aug 27;2020:4386361. doi: 10.1155/2020/4386361. eCollection 2020.
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is applied in the conservative treatment of inflammatory plantar fasciitis, which is also a characteristic feature of spondyloarthritis (SpA) (Gill, 1997 and Roxas, 2005). We determined and compared the effectiveness of LLLT and ESWT using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
This study is a prospective, randomized, comparative, single-blind clinical study. Voluntarily followed 40 patients with the diagnosis of SpA and having pain at the heels at least for 6 months. Patients were divided randomly into two treatment groups. One group undertook 14 sessions of infrared Ga-Al-As LLLT, and the other group undertook 3 sessions ESWT. Feet functions of the patients were evaluated by American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Roles and Maudsley Scoring; VAS was evaluated for foot pain and function. In clinical assessment, disease activity was carried out by applying the BASDAI, the functional assessment was evaluated through the BASFI, and the patient quality of life was evaluated through the ASQoL; enthesitis was scored according to MASES assessment, performed before and at 1 month after treatment. The thickness of the plantar fascia was measured with MRI before and 1 month after treatment.
Compared with the pretherapy, progress in the feet function by AOFAS and Roles-Maudsley scoring and decrease in VAS levels were statistically significant in both groups ( < 0.001). Only the VAS exercise score was superior to LLLT ( < 0.05). The thickness of the plantar fascia had decreased significantly on MRI in all two groups.
The treatment of plantar fasciitis with LLLT and ESWT was more successful in pain improvement and functional outcomes with the dose, frequency, and duration used in our study.
低强度激光疗法(LLLT)和体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)被应用于炎性足底筋膜炎的保守治疗,这也是脊柱关节炎(SpA)的一个特征(吉尔,1997年;罗克萨斯,2005年)。我们使用磁共振成像(MRI)确定并比较了LLLT和ESWT的疗效。
本研究是一项前瞻性、随机、对照、单盲临床研究。自愿纳入40例诊断为SpA且足跟疼痛至少6个月的患者。患者被随机分为两个治疗组。一组接受14次红外Ga-Al-As LLLT治疗,另一组接受3次ESWT治疗。通过美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)和罗尔斯与莫兹利评分评估患者的足部功能;通过视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估足部疼痛和功能。在临床评估中,应用巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)评估疾病活动度,通过巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数(BASFI)评估功能,通过强直性脊柱炎患者生活质量问卷(ASQoL)评估患者生活质量;根据治疗前和治疗后1个月进行的肌腱端炎评分系统(MASES)评估肌腱端炎情况。在治疗前和治疗后1个月用MRI测量足底筋膜厚度。
与治疗前相比,两组患者的AOFAS评分和罗尔斯-莫兹利评分在足部功能方面均有改善,VAS水平降低,差异有统计学意义(<0.001)。仅VAS运动评分ESWT优于LLLT(<0.05)。两组患者MRI显示足底筋膜厚度均显著降低。
在我们的研究中,使用的剂量、频率和疗程下,LLLT和ESWT治疗足底筋膜炎在改善疼痛和功能方面更成功。