Havlik John L, Vieira Sugano Yuri Y, Jacobi Maura Clement, Kukreja Rahul R, Jacobi John H Clement, Mason Peggy
Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Pritzker Medical School, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 8;6(28):eabb4205. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb4205. eCollection 2020 Jul.
To investigate whether the classic bystander effect is unique to humans, the effect of bystanders on rat helping was studied. In the presence of rats rendered incompetent to help through pharmacological treatment, rats were less likely to help due to a reduction in reinforcement rather than to a lack of initial interest. Only incompetent helpers of a strain familiar to the helper rat exerted a detrimental effect on helping; rats helped at near control levels in the presence of incompetent helpers from an unfamiliar strain. Duos and trios of potential helper rats helped at superadditive rates, demonstrating that rats act nonindependently with helping facilitated by the presence of competent-to-help bystanders. Furthermore, helping was facilitated in rats that had previously observed other rats' helping and were then tested individually. In sum, the influence of bystanders on helping behavior in rats features characteristics that closely resemble those observed in humans.
为了研究经典的旁观者效应是否仅存在于人类中,研究了旁观者对大鼠帮助行为的影响。在存在通过药物治疗而无法提供帮助的大鼠的情况下,由于强化作用的降低而非缺乏初始兴趣,大鼠提供帮助的可能性降低。只有与帮助大鼠熟悉的品系的无能力帮助者才会对帮助行为产生不利影响;在存在来自不熟悉品系的无能力帮助者的情况下,大鼠的帮助行为接近对照水平。潜在帮助大鼠的二人组和三人组以超加性速率提供帮助,表明大鼠在有能力提供帮助的旁观者在场的情况下,其行为并非独立,帮助行为得到促进。此外,先前观察过其他大鼠帮助行为然后单独进行测试的大鼠,其帮助行为也得到了促进。总之,旁观者对大鼠帮助行为的影响具有与在人类中观察到的特征非常相似的特点。