Suppr超能文献

打印参数和细胞密度对生物墨水打印结果的影响。

The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes.

机构信息

Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Department of Bioengineering and Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Tissue Eng Part A. 2020 Dec;26(23-24):1349-1358. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0210. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

Abstract

Bioink printability persists as a limiting factor toward many bioprinting applications. Printing parameter selection is largely user-dependent, and the effect of cell density on printability has not been thoroughly investigated. Recently, methods have been developed to give greater insight into printing outcomes. This study aims to further advance those methods and apply them to study the effect of printing parameters (feedrate and flowrate) and cell density on printability. Two printed structures, a crosshatch and five-layer tube, were established as printing standards and utilized to determine the printing outcomes. Acellular bioinks were printed using a testing matrix of feedrates of 37.5, 75, 150, 300, and 600 mm/min and flowrates of 21, 42, 84, 168, and 336 mm/min. Structures were also printed with cell densities of 5, 10, 20, and 40 × 10 cell/mL at 150 mm/min and 84 mm/min. Only speed ratios (defined as flowrate divided by feedrate) from 0.07 to 2.24 mm were suitable for analysis. Increasing speed ratio dramatically increased the height, width, and wall thickness of tubular structures, but did not influence radial accuracy. For crosshatch structures, the area of pores and the frequency of broken filaments were decreased without impacting pore shape (). Within speed ratios, feedrate and flowrate had negligible, inconsistent effects. Cell density did not affect any printing outcomes despite slight rheological changes. Printing outcomes were dominated by the speed ratio, with feedrate, flowrate, and cell density having little impact on printing outcomes when controlling for speed ratio within the ranges tested. The relevance of these results to other bioinks and printing conditions requires continued investigation by the bioprinting community, as well as highlight speed ratio as a key variable to report and suggest that rheology is a more sensitive measure than printing outcomes.

摘要

生物墨水的可打印性仍然是许多生物打印应用的一个限制因素。打印参数的选择在很大程度上取决于用户,而且细胞密度对可打印性的影响尚未得到彻底研究。最近,已经开发出一些方法来更深入地了解打印结果。本研究旨在进一步推进这些方法,并将其应用于研究打印参数(进给速度和流量)和细胞密度对可打印性的影响。建立了两种打印结构,即交叉线和五层管,作为打印标准,并用于确定打印结果。使用进给速度为 37.5、75、150、300 和 600 mm/min 和流量为 21、42、84、168 和 336 mm/min 的测试矩阵打印无细胞生物墨水。还以 150mm/min 和 84mm/min 的速度打印细胞密度为 5、10、20 和 40×10 个细胞/mL 的结构。只有速度比(定义为流量除以进给速度)在 0.07 至 2.24 mm 范围内适合分析。速度比的增加显著增加了管状结构的高度、宽度和壁厚,但不影响径向精度。对于十字形结构,孔的面积和断裂丝的频率减少,而不影响孔的形状()。在速度比内,进给速度和流量的影响可以忽略不计,而且不一致。尽管流变学有轻微变化,但细胞密度不影响任何打印结果。打印结果主要由速度比决定,在测试范围内控制速度比时,进给速度、流量和细胞密度对打印结果的影响很小。这些结果与其他生物墨水和打印条件的相关性需要生物打印界的进一步研究,并强调速度比作为一个关键变量进行报告,并建议流变学是比打印结果更敏感的测量方法。

相似文献

1
9
Printability in extrusion bioprinting.挤出式生物打印的可打印性。
Biofabrication. 2021 Apr 8;13(3). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/abe7ab.

引用本文的文献

9
Methodology for characterizing the printability of hydrogels.水凝胶可印刷性的表征方法。
Int J Bioprint. 2023 Jan 10;9(2):667. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i2.667. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验