• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)对创伤患者的预后评估:一项诊断准确性研究。

Prognosis of the Trauma Patients According to the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS); A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

作者信息

Hosseinpour Reza, Barghi Amir, Mehrabi Saadat, Salaminia Shirvan, Tobeh Paria

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Clinical Research Development Unit of Beheshti Hospital, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.

Clinical Research Development Unit of Beheshti Hospital, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.

出版信息

Bull Emerg Trauma. 2020 Jul;8(3):148-155. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2020.84613.

DOI:10.30476/BEAT.2020.84613
PMID:32944574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7468220/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognosis and survival rates of a group of Iranian patients with traumatic injuries using the trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) model.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, all the patients with multi-trauma referring to the Yasuj Shahid Beheshti hospital during 2018 were included. The patients' demographic information, trauma and history of previous illness were recorded. Vital symptoms including respiratory rate, heart rate, hypertension, pulse rate and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score were assessed. The injury severity score (ISS) was calculated based on the type and location of the injuries and according to the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) classification. The survival probability of the patients was assessed according to the TRISS model.

RESULTS

Overall, 252 trauma patients were evaluated out of whom, 195 (77.4%) were men and 57 (22.6%) women. If we consider the TRISS score probability above 0.5 as the chance of being alive, the mortality rate was 6.75%, that was lower than our series (7.1%). The ISS score and GCS had a positive significant relationship with other variables except respiratory rate, body temperature and hospitalization. Revised trauma score (RTS) was significantly associated with other variables including age, GCS, hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure and respiratory rate. TRISS had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.988 indicating a high prognostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The mortality rate was lower than that of being predicted by TRISS. This might be due to treatment effectiveness and care for traumatic patients leading to decreased mortality. TRISS had high prognostic accuracy in trauma patients. We also reported an association between hemoglobin and survival rate. Therefore, it seems that considering the laboratory parameters can be useful in patients with trauma.

摘要

目的

使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)模型研究一组伊朗创伤患者的预后和生存率。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,纳入了2018年期间转诊至亚苏杰沙希德贝赫什提医院的所有多发伤患者。记录患者的人口统计学信息、创伤情况和既往病史。评估生命体征,包括呼吸频率、心率、血压、脉搏率和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分。根据损伤类型和部位,按照简明损伤定级标准(AIS)分类计算损伤严重程度评分(ISS)。根据TRISS模型评估患者的生存概率。

结果

总体而言,共评估了252例创伤患者,其中195例(77.4%)为男性,57例(22.6%)为女性。如果将TRISS评分概率高于0.5视为存活机会,死亡率为6.75%,低于我们系列研究中的死亡率(7.1%)。ISS评分和GCS与除呼吸频率、体温和住院时间外的其他变量呈显著正相关。改良创伤评分(RTS)与包括年龄、GCS、血红蛋白、收缩压和呼吸频率在内的其他变量显著相关。TRISS的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.988,表明预后准确性较高。

结论

死亡率低于TRISS预测值。这可能是由于对创伤患者的治疗效果和护理导致死亡率降低。TRISS在创伤患者中具有较高的预后准确性。我们还报告了血红蛋白与生存率之间的关联。因此,考虑实验室参数似乎对创伤患者有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8330/7468220/f1e588065b37/bet-8-148-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8330/7468220/1cef506f8be1/bet-8-148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8330/7468220/f1e588065b37/bet-8-148-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8330/7468220/1cef506f8be1/bet-8-148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8330/7468220/f1e588065b37/bet-8-148-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognosis of the Trauma Patients According to the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS); A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.根据创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)对创伤患者的预后评估:一项诊断准确性研究。
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2020 Jul;8(3):148-155. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2020.84613.
2
The Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSIG) and Prediction of Mortality Outcome in Adult Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Based on Registered Trauma Data.反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分(rSIG)与成人创伤患者死亡率预测的关系:基于注册创伤数据的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 24;15(11):2346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112346.
3
Utilizing ultra-early continuous physiologic data to develop automated measures of clinical severity in a traumatic brain injury population.利用超早期连续生理数据为创伤性脑损伤患者开发临床严重程度的自动化评估指标。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 31;14(1):7618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57538-5.
4
A Comparative Study of Injury Severity Scales as Predictors of Mortality in Trauma Patients: Which Scale Is the Best?创伤患者损伤严重程度评分作为死亡率预测指标的比较研究:哪种评分最佳?
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2020 Jan;8(1):27-33. doi: 10.29252/beat-080105.
5
Comparing NEWS2, TRISS, and RTS in predicting mortality rate in trauma patients based on prehospital data set: a diagnostic study.比较基于院前数据集的 NEWS2、TRISS 和 RTS 在预测创伤患者死亡率方面的表现:一项诊断研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01084-w.
6
Incorporating recent advances to make the TRISS approach universally available.结合最新进展,使创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)方法普遍可用。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):1002-8; discussion 1008-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000215827.54546.01.
7
Exploring injury severity measures and in-hospital mortality: A multi-hospital study in Kenya.探索损伤严重程度指标与院内死亡率:肯尼亚的一项多医院研究。
Injury. 2017 Oct;48(10):2112-2118. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
8
New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments for survival prediction.新创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)调整以进行生存预测。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Mar 6;13:12. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0171-8. eCollection 2018.
9
The Relationship Between Trauma Scoring Systems and Outcomes in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者创伤评分系统与预后的关系
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2022 Oct 13;18(2):169-177. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2022.18.e54. eCollection 2022 Oct.
10
Comparison of Trauma Severity Scores (ISS, NISS, RTS, BIG Score, and TRISS) in Multiple Trauma Patients.多发伤患者创伤严重评分(ISS、NISS、RTS、BIG 评分和 TRISS)比较。
J Trauma Nurs. 2021;28(2):100-106. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000567.

引用本文的文献

1
An overview of stem cells and cell products involved in trauma injury.创伤损伤中涉及的干细胞和细胞产物概述。
Regen Ther. 2025 Mar 11;29:60-76. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2025.02.011. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Quality of pediatric trauma care: development of an age-adjusted TRISS model and survival benchmarking in a major trauma center.儿童创伤护理质量:在一家大型创伤中心开发年龄调整后的TRISS模型及生存基准评估
Front Pediatr. 2024 Dec 12;12:1481467. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1481467. eCollection 2024.
3
Settlement Is at the End-Common Trauma Scores Require a Critical Reassessment Due to the Possible Dynamics of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Patients' Clinical Course.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency Trauma Providers as Equal Partners: From "Proof of Concept" to "Outcome Parity".作为平等伙伴的急诊创伤救治人员:从“概念验证”到“结果平等”
Am Surg. 2019 Sep 1;85(9):961-964.
2
A study of mortality risk factors among trauma referrals to trauma center, Shiraz, Iran, 2017.2017年伊朗设拉子创伤中心创伤转诊患者死亡风险因素研究。
Chin J Traumatol. 2019 Aug;22(4):212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 May 31.
3
A Comparison between the Ability of Revised Trauma Score and Kampala Trauma Score in Predicting Mortality; a Meta-Analysis.
由于患者临床病程中创伤性脑损伤可能存在动态变化,结局评估需对常用创伤评分进行批判性重新评估。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 5;13(11):3333. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113333.
4
Evaluation of emergency department admissions of mass casualty patients using the revised trauma score, injury severity score, and trauma and injury severity score.应用改良创伤评分、创伤严重度评分和创伤与损伤严重度评分评估大批伤员患者的急诊科入院情况。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Mar;30(3):192-202. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.73531.
5
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on trauma mortality patients: A retrospective observational study in an Iranian level 1 trauma center.2019冠状病毒病大流行对创伤死亡患者的影响:伊朗一级创伤中心的一项回顾性观察研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 13;7(2):e1883. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1883. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Evaluation of the predictive effects of trauma scoring systems in colorectal injuries.创伤评分系统对结直肠损伤的预测效果评估
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Feb;50(1):269-274. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02328-3. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
7
Use of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) as a Predictor of Patient Outcome in Cases of Trauma Presenting in the Trauma and Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Institute.在一家三级医疗机构的创伤与急诊科,使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)作为创伤病例患者预后的预测指标。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 14;15(6):e40410. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40410. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Multifaceted Analysis of the Environmental Factors in Severely Injured Trauma: A 30-Day Survival Analysis.严重创伤环境因素的多方面分析:一项30天生存分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 5;11(9):1333. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091333.
修订创伤评分与坎帕拉创伤评分预测死亡率能力的比较;一项荟萃分析。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 15;7(1):e6. eCollection 2019 Winter.
4
Injury Severity Score alone predicts mortality when compared to EMS scene time and transport time for motor vehicle trauma patients who arrive alive to hospital.对于活着抵达医院的机动车创伤患者,与急救医疗服务现场时间和转运时间相比,仅损伤严重度评分就能预测死亡率。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S167-S168. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1532217.
5
Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、地区和国家残疾调整生命年(DALYs)359 种疾病和伤害以及 195 个国家和地区 1990-2017 年的健康期望寿命(HALE):2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1859-1922. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32335-3.
6
Comparison of the new Exponential Injury Severity Score with the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score in trauma patients: A cross-sectional study.新指数损伤严重度评分与损伤严重度评分及新损伤严重度评分在创伤患者中的比较:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187871. eCollection 2017.
7
Injury patterns among various age and gender groups of trauma patients in southern Iran: A cross-sectional study.伊朗南部创伤患者不同年龄和性别组的损伤模式:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(41):e7812. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007812.
8
Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) for 315 Diseases and Injuries and Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE) in Iran and its Neighboring Countries, 1990-2015: Findings from Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1990 - 2015年伊朗及其邻国315种疾病和损伤的伤残调整生命年(DALYs)及健康预期寿命(HALE):全球疾病负担研究2015的结果
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Jul;20(7):403-418.
9
Comparison of Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score for mortality prediction in elderly trauma patients.修订创伤评分、损伤严重度评分和创伤与损伤严重度评分在老年创伤患者死亡率预测中的比较
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2016 Nov;22(6):536-540. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2016.93288.
10
Mortality prediction models in the general trauma population: A systematic review.普通创伤人群的死亡率预测模型:一项系统综述。
Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 15.