• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粗略匹配足以通过工作记忆表征来吸引注意力,除非与目标匹配特征。 (此译文似乎不太通顺,可能原文存在一些表述不太清晰准确的问题,但按照要求严格翻译了。)

Coarse matching was sufficient to capture attention by working memory representations unless matching features with the target.

作者信息

Hu Cenlou, Luo Ziwen, Huang Sai, Zhang Bao

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.

Changde Vocational Technical College, Changde, 415000, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 3;13(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02522-5.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02522-5
PMID:40033452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11877691/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In most theoretical frameworks, the effectiveness of attentional selection relies significantly on the perceptual similarity between the target template and visual input. Nevertheless, ambiguity exists surrounding whether attentional capture triggered by irrelevant representations in Working Memory (WM) is influenced by the perceptual similarity levels of features between WM content and its matching distractors.

METHODS

We designed a hybrid WM and visual search task, varying such perceptual similarity of colors across three levels: exact, high-similar, and low-similar matching. To quantify the extent of the capture effect, we compared these conditions against a neutral baseline (i.e., completely different color) using eye movement and behavioral data in two experiments.

RESULTS

We consistently observed robust attentional capture effects across two experiments, evident in both eye movement indices and manual reaction times. In Experiment 1, where WM representations solely matched features to visual search distractors (task-irrelevant scenario), we found that changes in perceptual similarity did not influence attentional capture. Conversely, in Experiment 2, where WM representations had the potential to match the visual search target (task-relevant scenario), we observed a significantly more robust attentional capture effect for high-similar matching compared to low-similar matching conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings imply that coarse matching between distractors and WM contents is sufficient to capture attention, unless the matching features potentially correspond to the visual target. Furthermore, task relevance sharpens perceptual sensitivity to visual input, highlighting distinct mechanisms underlying attentional capture by irrelevant representations and target templates within WM.

摘要

背景

在大多数理论框架中,注意力选择的有效性很大程度上依赖于目标模板与视觉输入之间的感知相似性。然而,工作记忆(WM)中无关表征引发的注意力捕获是否受WM内容与其匹配的干扰项之间特征的感知相似性水平影响,仍存在争议。

方法

我们设计了一个WM与视觉搜索的混合任务,将颜色的感知相似性分为三个水平:精确匹配、高度相似匹配和低度相似匹配。为了量化捕获效应的程度,我们在两个实验中使用眼动和行为数据,将这些条件与中性基线(即完全不同的颜色)进行比较。

结果

我们在两个实验中始终观察到强大的注意力捕获效应,在眼动指标和手动反应时间中均很明显。在实验1中,WM表征仅将特征与视觉搜索干扰项匹配(任务无关场景),我们发现感知相似性的变化不会影响注意力捕获。相反,在实验2中,WM表征有可能与视觉搜索目标匹配(任务相关场景),我们观察到与低度相似匹配条件相比,高度相似匹配的注意力捕获效应明显更强。

结论

这些发现表明,干扰项与WM内容之间的粗略匹配足以捕获注意力,除非匹配的特征可能对应于视觉目标。此外,任务相关性增强了对视觉输入的感知敏感性,突出了WM中无关表征和目标模板引起注意力捕获的不同机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4c/11877691/97175b3135cd/40359_2025_2522_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4c/11877691/3d74aa5c4f45/40359_2025_2522_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4c/11877691/0c31fd332ee1/40359_2025_2522_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4c/11877691/97175b3135cd/40359_2025_2522_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4c/11877691/3d74aa5c4f45/40359_2025_2522_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4c/11877691/0c31fd332ee1/40359_2025_2522_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa4c/11877691/97175b3135cd/40359_2025_2522_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Coarse matching was sufficient to capture attention by working memory representations unless matching features with the target.粗略匹配足以通过工作记忆表征来吸引注意力,除非与目标匹配特征。 (此译文似乎不太通顺,可能原文存在一些表述不太清晰准确的问题,但按照要求严格翻译了。)
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 3;13(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02522-5.
2
Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory.控制工作记忆中分散信息的流动。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jun 10;31(7):3323-3337. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab013.
3
Multisensory working memory capture of attention.多感觉工作记忆捕获注意力。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct;86(7):2363-2373. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02960-0. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
4
The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.视觉搜索准备过程中目标模板激活过程的时间进程。
J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;38(44):9527-9538. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-18.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
5
Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.视觉工作记忆中的多重状态:来自记忆匹配干扰物引发的眼动捕获的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Aug;26(4):1340-1346. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01608-7.
6
Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.视觉工作记忆负荷会干扰基于空间的目标选择的注意力引导。
Br J Psychol. 2019 May;110(2):357-371. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12323. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
7
Capacity limitations in template-guided multiple color search.模板引导的多颜色搜索中的容量限制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Jun;29(3):901-909. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02040-6. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
8
The modulation of perceptual selection by working memory is dependent on the focus of spatial attention.工作记忆对知觉选择的调节取决于空间注意的焦点。
Vision Res. 2010 Jul 9;50(15):1437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.016. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
9
Focusing attention in working and long-term memory through dissociable mechanisms.通过可分离机制将注意力集中于工作记忆和长期记忆。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 3;16(1):4126. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59359-0.
10
Memory-driven capture during focused visual attention.记忆驱动的聚焦视觉注意捕获。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jun;88(4):1389-1398. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01933-0. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Attentional Capture and Control.注意力的捕获与控制
Annu Rev Psychol. 2025 Jan;76(1):251-273. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-011624-025340. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
Which processes dominate visual search: Bottom-up feature contrast, top-down tuning or trial history?哪些过程主导视觉搜索:自下而上的特征对比、自上而下的调整还是试验历史?
Cognition. 2023 Jul;236:105420. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105420. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
3
Good-enough attentional guidance.良好的注意力引导。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Apr;27(4):391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
4
Visual search guidance uses coarser template information than target-match decisions.视觉搜索指导比目标匹配决策使用更粗糙的模板信息。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1432-1445. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02478-3. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
5
Guidance of attention by working memory is a matter of representational fidelity.工作记忆引导注意力是一个代表性忠实度的问题。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Mar;48(3):202-231. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000985. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
6
Attentional Guidance and Match Decisions Rely on Different Template Information During Visual Search.注意引导和匹配决策在视觉搜索中依赖不同的模板信息。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;33(1):105-120. doi: 10.1177/09567976211032225. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
7
Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search.工作记忆中的资源分配:对视觉搜索的理论和经验影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1093-1111. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01881-5. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.引导式搜索 6.0:一种更新的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1060-1092. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
9
Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.量化工作记忆匹配目标与干扰项的注意力影响。
Vis cogn. 2019;27(5-8):452-466. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1634172. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
Three visual working memory representations simultaneously control attention.三种视觉工作记忆表象同时控制着注意力。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 29;10(1):10504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67455-y.