Suppr超能文献

研究人员及其实验模型:欧盟健康与生命科学研究背景下的一项初步调查。

Researchers and Their Experimental Models: A Pilot Survey in the Context of the European Union Health and Life Science Research.

作者信息

Del Pace Lorenzo, Viviani Laura, Straccia Marco

机构信息

Independent Consultant in Philosophy of Science, 04100 Latina, Italy.

Independent Consultant in Science Ethics, 4053 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 14;12(20):2778. doi: 10.3390/ani12202778.

Abstract

A significant debate is ongoing on the effectiveness of animal experimentation, due to the increasing reports of failure in the translation of results from preclinical animal experiments to human patients. Scientific, ethical, social and economic considerations linked to the use of animals raise concerns in a variety of societal contributors (regulators, policy makers, non-governmental organisations, industry, etc.). The aim of this study was to record researchers' voices about their vision on this science evolution, to reconstruct as truthful as possible an image of the reality of health and life science research, by using a key instrument in the hands of the researcher: the experimental models. Hence, we surveyed European-based health and life sciences researchers, to reconstruct and decipher the varying orientations and opinions of this community over these large transformations. In the interest of advancing the public debate and more accurately guide the policy of research, it is important that policy makers, society, scientists and all stakeholders (1) mature as comprehensive as possible an understanding of the researchers' perspectives on the selection and establishment of the experimental models, and (2) that researchers publicly share the research community opinions regarding the external factors influencing their professional work. Our results highlighted a general homogeneity of answers from the 117 respondents. However, some discrepancies on specific key issues and topics were registered in the subgroups. These recorded divergent views might prove useful to policy makers and regulators to calibrate their agenda and shape the future of the European health and life science research. Overall, the results of this pilot study highlight the need of a continuous, open and broad discussion between researchers and science policy stakeholders.

摘要

由于越来越多的报告表明临床前动物实验结果转化为人类患者治疗效果的失败,关于动物实验有效性的重大辩论正在进行。与动物使用相关的科学、伦理、社会和经济因素引发了社会各界(监管机构、政策制定者、非政府组织、行业等)的关注。本研究的目的是记录研究人员对这一科学发展的看法,通过研究人员手中的关键工具——实验模型,尽可能真实地重构健康与生命科学研究的现实图景。因此,我们对欧洲的健康与生命科学研究人员进行了调查,以重构和解读这个群体在这些重大变革中的不同取向和观点。为了推动公众辩论并更准确地指导研究政策,政策制定者、社会、科学家和所有利益相关者做到以下两点很重要:(1)尽可能全面地理解研究人员对实验模型选择和建立的观点;(2)研究人员公开分享研究群体关于影响其专业工作的外部因素的意见。我们的结果突出了117名受访者答案的总体同质性。然而,在各子群体中,在一些特定关键问题和主题上存在差异。这些记录下来的不同观点可能对政策制定者和监管机构校准议程以及塑造欧洲健康与生命科学研究的未来有用。总体而言,这项初步研究的结果凸显了研究人员与科学政策利益相关者之间持续、开放和广泛讨论的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d37/9597815/0c6e5566f907/animals-12-02778-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验