Fralin Biomedical Research Institute.
Department of Statistics.
Health Psychol. 2021 Dec;40(12):881-886. doi: 10.1037/hea0001031. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
The novel theory of Reinforcer Pathology states that the temporal window of integration, measured by delay discounting (DD), determines the value of reinforcers. Based on the Reinforcer Pathology theory, the valuation of alternative reinforcers is positively associated with the length of the temporal window (negatively with rates of discounting). The objective of this article is to test the Reinforcer Pathology theory by reanalyzing data from a prior report (Carr & Epstein, 2018) in order to examine the association between the reinforcing value of alternative reinforcement and the length of the measured temporal window.
Participants ( = 250) who completed an adjusting delay discounting task and the Pleasant Events Schedule (PES) were included in the study. PES provides a measurement of a reinforcement score (a cross-product of PES measures of frequency and pleasantness) for 45 noneating alternative activities. Analysis of Variance and Spearman product-moment correlations were completed.
Delay discounting was significantly positively correlated with sedentary reinforcement and significantly negatively correlated with cognitively enriching activities. A significant interaction was observed in the preference for between food and cognitive-enriching context as a function ln(k) in predicting the cognitive-enriching activity class. Nonsignificant relationships were also observed with the correlation of delay discounting to the reinforcement of social and physical activities.
These findings provide initial support for Reinforcer Pathology theory and indicate that the temporal window over which reinforcers are integrated may be a factor contributing to a preference for some healthy or unhealthy alternative reinforcers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
强化病理理论提出,通过延迟折扣(DD)测量的整合时间窗口决定了强化物的价值。基于强化病理理论,替代强化物的估值与时间窗口的长度呈正相关(与折扣率呈负相关)。本文的目的是通过重新分析之前的一份报告(Carr & Epstein, 2018)的数据来检验强化病理理论,以检验替代强化物的强化价值与测量时间窗口长度之间的关系。
研究纳入了完成调整延迟折扣任务和愉快事件量表(PES)的 250 名参与者。PES 提供了 45 种非饮食替代活动的强化得分(PES 测量的频率和愉快程度的乘积)的测量。完成了方差分析和斯皮尔曼积矩相关分析。
延迟折扣与久坐强化物显著正相关,与认知丰富活动显著负相关。ln(k) 对预测认知丰富活动类别的食物与认知丰富环境之间的偏好有显著的交互作用。延迟折扣与社会和身体活动的强化之间也存在不显著的关系。
这些发现初步支持了强化病理理论,表明强化物整合的时间窗口可能是对某些健康或不健康的替代强化物的偏好的一个因素。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。