Department of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Hellenic Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Athens, Greece.
Eur Geriatr Med. 2021 Feb;12(1):27-44. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00399-8. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
To examine the relationship between sleep quality and duration and muscle strength among community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults.
A systematic review was conducted from March 2020 until May 2020. Searches were done for peer-reviewed and English-written articles reporting results of studies in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and in article references lists. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was used as well as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to appraise the methodological quality.
Twenty-one cross-sectional, three prospective studies and a total of 92,363 subjects were included. The majority of the included studies are classified as "high quality". Handgrip strength is the main method of muscle strength assessment. Sleep assessment is usually conducted using subjective measures, such as validated sleep scales or self-reported questionnaires. Actigraphy, as an objective measure, is used less often. Most studies support strong evidence on the association between weak muscle strength and poor sleep quality and duration among middle-aged and older adults; whereas the results for the gender-specific association and the impact of short or long sleep duration were inconclusive.
This review has identified strong evidence on the relationship between sleep quality and duration and muscle strength among middle-aged and older adults. Health professionals should consider this relationship as a component of geriatric assessment in community practice and geriatric settings. Future rigorous research with a combination of subjective and objective measurements is needed to explore whether gender and specific sleep duration are related to muscle strength.
研究社区中老年人群睡眠质量和时长与肌肉力量之间的关系。
系统检索 2020 年 3 月至 5 月期间发表的英文同行评议文献,检索数据库包括 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆和文献参考文献列表。采用系统评价和荟萃分析的 Preferred Reporting Items(PRISMA)以及 Newcastle-Ottawa 量表(NOS)评估方法学质量。
共纳入 21 项横断面研究、3 项前瞻性研究,共计 92363 例受试者。大多数纳入的研究被归类为“高质量”。握力是肌肉力量评估的主要方法。睡眠评估通常采用主观测量方法,如经过验证的睡眠量表或自我报告问卷。作为一种客观测量方法,活动记录仪的使用较少。大多数研究支持强有力的证据表明,中老年人肌肉力量弱与睡眠质量和时长差之间存在关联;而关于性别特异性关联以及短或长睡眠时间的影响的结果尚无定论。
本综述确定了中老年人睡眠质量和时长与肌肉力量之间的密切关系。在社区实践和老年科环境中,卫生专业人员应将这种关系视为老年评估的一个组成部分。未来需要进行严格的研究,结合主观和客观测量方法,以探讨性别和特定睡眠时间是否与肌肉力量相关。