Bogale Mesfin, Baniya Anil, DiGennaro Peter
Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Plants (Basel). 2020 Sep 24;9(10):1260. doi: 10.3390/plants9101260.
Nematodes are among the most diverse but least studied organisms. The classic morphology-based identification has proved insufficient to the study of nematode identification and diversity, mainly for lack of sufficient morphological variations among closely related taxa. Different molecular methods have been used to supplement morphology-based methods and/or circumvent these problems with various degrees of success. These methods range from fingerprint to sequence analyses of DNA- and/or protein-based information. Image analyses techniques have also contributed towards this success. In this review, we highlight what each of these methods entail and provide examples where more recent advances of these techniques have been employed in nematode identification. Wherever possible, emphasis has been given to nematodes of agricultural significance. We show that these alternative methods have aided nematode identification and raised our understanding of nematode diversity and phylogeny. We discuss the pros and cons of these methods and conclude that no one method by itself provides all the answers; the choice of method depends on the question at hand, the nature of the samples, and the availability of resources.
线虫是种类最为多样但研究最少的生物之一。经典的基于形态学的鉴定方法已被证明不足以用于线虫鉴定和多样性研究,主要原因是亲缘关系较近的类群之间缺乏足够的形态变异。不同的分子方法已被用于补充基于形态学的方法和/或不同程度地成功解决这些问题。这些方法涵盖从指纹分析到基于DNA和/或蛋白质信息的序列分析。图像分析技术也为这一成功做出了贡献。在本综述中,我们重点介绍了每种方法的具体内容,并提供了这些技术的最新进展应用于线虫鉴定的实例。只要有可能,我们都强调了具有农业重要性的线虫。我们表明,这些替代方法有助于线虫鉴定,并增进了我们对线虫多样性和系统发育的理解。我们讨论了这些方法的优缺点,并得出结论:没有一种方法能独自提供所有答案;方法的选择取决于手头的问题、样本的性质以及资源的可用性。