• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk of Stroke and Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Apixaban Compared with Warfarin.阿哌沙班与华法林治疗心房颤动时的中风和出血风险比较
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):3597-3604. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06180-8. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
Real-world evidence of stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States: the REVISIT-US study.美国非瓣膜性心房颤动患者卒中预防的真实世界证据:REVISIT-US研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Dec;32(12):2047-2053. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1237937. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
3
Effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in "real-world" clinical practice. A propensity-matched analysis of 76,940 patients.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者真实世界临床实践中阿哌沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性:76940 例患者的倾向性匹配分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jun 2;117(6):1072-1082. doi: 10.1160/TH17-01-0068. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
4
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.非瓣膜性心房颤动且既往有卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者中应用阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2142-2149. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017474. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
5
Comparative Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Older Medicare Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.老年 Medicare 患者口服抗凝药治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的卒中、出血和死亡率比较。
Am J Med. 2019 May;132(5):596-604.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
6
Real-world comparison of major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. A propensity score matched analysis.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者应用阿哌沙班、达比加群、利伐沙班或华法林起始抗凝治疗的大出血风险的真实世界比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2016 Oct 28;116(5):975-986. doi: 10.1160/TH16-05-0403. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
7
Safety and effectiveness of apixaban in comparison to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a propensity-matched analysis from Japanese administrative claims data.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中阿哌沙班与华法林的安全性和有效性比较:来自日本行政索赔数据的倾向评分匹配分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Sep;34(9):1627-1634. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1478282. Epub 2018 May 30.
8
Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与华法林相比治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003725. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003725.
9
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动虚弱患者中阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 13;7(8):e008643. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008643.
10
Major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving apixaban or warfarin: The ARISTOTLE Trial (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation): Predictors, Characteristics, and Clinical Outcomes.服用阿哌沙班或华法林的房颤患者的大出血:ARISTOTLE 试验(阿哌沙班用于减少房颤中的中风和其他血栓栓塞事件):预测因素、特征和临床结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 27;63(20):2141-2147. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.549. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the treatment patterns among commercially insured patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation prescribed an oral anticoagulant by race/ethnicity.按种族/民族对开具口服抗凝剂的商业保险非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的治疗模式进行评估。
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Sep;14(9):e250057. doi: 10.57264/cer-2025-0057. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
2
Geographic and Racial Variation in Oral Anticoagulant (OAC) Treatment Among Commercially Insured Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) in the United States.美国商业保险覆盖的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者口服抗凝剂(OAC)治疗的地域和种族差异
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1007/s40256-025-00728-x.
3
Innovations in pharmacovigilance studies of medicines in older people.老年人药物警戒研究的创新
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jan;91(1):66-83. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16049. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
4
Effect of edoxaban compared with other oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis.依度沙班与其他口服抗凝药相比在预防心房颤动患者卒中方面的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 3;9(11):e21740. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21740. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban in over 3.9 Million People with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿哌沙班用于390多万房颤患者的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 30;11(13):3788. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133788.
6
Reappraisal of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心房颤动患者非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药的重新评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 15;8:757188. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.757188. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗美国国防部人群中未经治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的有效性和安全性比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1116-1.
2
Comparative Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Older Medicare Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.老年 Medicare 患者口服抗凝药治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的卒中、出血和死亡率比较。
Am J Med. 2019 May;132(5):596-604.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
3
The FDA Sentinel Initiative - An Evolving National Resource.美国食品药品监督管理局哨点计划——一项不断发展的国家资源。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2091-2093. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1809643.
4
Assessing the impact of the new ICD-10-CM coding system on pharmacoepidemiologic studies-An application to the known association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angioedema.评估新 ICD-10-CM 编码系统对药物流行病学研究的影响——以血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管性水肿的已知关联为例。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):829-838. doi: 10.1002/pds.4550. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
5
Early impact of the ICD-10-CM transition on selected health outcomes in 13 electronic health care databases in the United States.美国 13 个电子医疗保健数据库中 ICD-10-CM 转换对部分健康结果的早期影响。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):839-847. doi: 10.1002/pds.4563. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
6
Trends and Variation in Oral Anticoagulant Choice in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation, 2010-2017.2010-2017 年心房颤动患者口服抗凝药物选择的趋势和变化。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Sep;38(9):907-920. doi: 10.1002/phar.2158. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
7
Trends in use of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation in Norway, 2010 to 2015.2010年至2015年挪威心房颤动患者使用华法林和直接口服抗凝剂的趋势
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;73(11):1417-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2296-1. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
8
Effects of policy interventions on the introduction of novel oral anticoagulants in Stockholm: an interrupted time series analysis.政策干预对斯德哥尔摩新型口服抗凝剂引入的影响:一项中断时间序列分析
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Mar;83(3):642-652. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13150. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
9
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulation usage according to age among patients with atrial fibrillation: Temporal trends 2011-2015 in Denmark.丹麦 2011-2015 年非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝药物在房颤患者中的使用情况:按年龄分组的时间趋势
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 11;6:31477. doi: 10.1038/srep31477.
10
Management of Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动患者的抗凝管理
JAMA. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):291-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3088.

阿哌沙班与华法林治疗心房颤动时的中风和出血风险比较

Risk of Stroke and Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Apixaban Compared with Warfarin.

作者信息

Bradley Marie, Welch Emily C, Eworuke Efe, Graham David J, Zhang Rongmei, Huang Ting-Ying

机构信息

Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):3597-3604. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06180-8. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-020-06180-8
PMID:32989717
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7728961/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A previous FDA study reported a favorable benefit risk for apixaban compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in older non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients (≥ 65 years). However, it remains unclear whether this favorable benefit risk persists in other populations including younger users. We examined if a similar benefit risk was observed in the Sentinel System and if it varied by age group.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the risk of ischemic stroke, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in apixaban users compared with warfarin users in Sentinel Distributed Database (SDD).

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective new user cohort study was conducted among patients, 21 years and older initiating apixaban and warfarin for NVAF, between December 28, 2012, and June 30, 2018, in the SDD.

MAIN MEASURES

Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for each outcome (ischemic stroke, GI bleeding, and ICH) in propensity score matched apixaban users compared with the warfarin users. Subgroup analyses by age (21-64, 65-74, and 75+ years) were conducted.

KEY RESULTS

After matching, 55.3% and 58.4% (n = 55,038) of the apixaban and warfarin users were included in the main analysis. GI bleeding was the most common outcome. The HR (95% CI) for GI bleeding, ICH, and ischemic stroke in apixaban users compared with warfarin users were 0.57 (0.50-0.66), 0.53 (0.40-0.70), and 0.56 (0.45-0.71) respectively. The reduced risk of these outcomes in apixaban compared with warfarin users persisted across age groups.

CONCLUSION

In NVAF patients of all ages initiating either apixaban or warfarin for stroke prevention in the Sentinel System, apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of GI bleeding, ICH, and ischemic stroke compared with warfarin. Among patients less than 65 years of age, apixaban use was associated with a decreased risk of GI bleeding and ischemic stroke.

摘要

背景

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)此前的一项研究报告称,在老年非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者(≥65岁)中,与华法林相比,阿哌沙班在预防中风方面具有良好的效益风险比。然而,在包括年轻使用者在内的其他人群中,这种良好的效益风险比是否持续存在仍不清楚。我们研究了在哨兵系统中是否观察到类似的效益风险比,以及它是否因年龄组而异。

目的

在哨兵分布式数据库(SDD)中,比较阿哌沙班使用者与华法林使用者发生缺血性中风、胃肠道(GI)出血和颅内出血(ICH)的风险。

设计与参与者

在2012年12月28日至2018年6月30日期间,对SDD中21岁及以上因NVAF开始使用阿哌沙班和华法林的患者进行了一项回顾性新使用者队列研究。

主要测量指标

采用Cox比例风险回归分析,估计倾向评分匹配的阿哌沙班使用者与华法林使用者相比,每种结局(缺血性中风、GI出血和ICH)的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。按年龄(21 - 64岁、65 - 74岁和75岁及以上)进行亚组分析。

关键结果

匹配后,主要分析纳入了55.3%的阿哌沙班使用者和58.4%(n = 55,038)的华法林使用者。GI出血是最常见的结局。与华法林使用者相比,阿哌沙班使用者发生GI出血、ICH和缺血性中风的HR(95%CI)分别为0.57(0.50 - 0.66)、0.53(0.40 - 0.70)和0.56(0.45 - 0.71)。与华法林使用者相比,阿哌沙班降低这些结局风险的效果在各年龄组中均持续存在。

结论

在哨兵系统中,所有年龄因中风预防而开始使用阿哌沙班或华法林的NVAF患者中,与华法林相比,阿哌沙班与GI出血、ICH和缺血性中风风险降低相关。在年龄小于65岁的患者中,使用阿哌沙班与GI出血和缺血性中风风险降低相关。