Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 1;116(1):86-94. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000913.
INTRODUCTION: Uncontrolled results suggest that diaphragmatic breathing (DB) is effective in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) but the mechanism of action and rigor of proof is lacking. This study aimed to determine the effects of DB on reflux, lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and gastric pressures in patients with upright GERD and controls. METHODS: Adult patients with pH proven upright GERD were studied. During a high-resolution impedance manometry, study patients received a standardized pH neutral refluxogenic meal followed by LES challenge maneuvers (Valsalva and abdominal hollowing) while randomized to DB or sham. After that, patients underwent 48 hours of pH-impedance monitoring, with 50% randomization to postprandial DB during the second day. RESULTS: On examining 23 patients and 10 controls, postprandial gastric pressure was found to be significantly higher in patients compared with that in controls (12 vs 7 mm Hg, P = 0.018). Valsalva maneuver produced reflux in 65.2% of patients compared with 44.4% of controls (P = 0.035). LES increased during the inspiratory portion of DB (42.2 vs 23.1 mm Hg, P < 0.001) in patients and healthy persons. Postprandial DB reduced the number of postprandial reflux events in patients (0.36 vs 2.60, P < 0.001) and healthy subjects (0.00 vs 1.75, P < 0.001) compared with observation. During 48-hour ambulatory study, DB reduced the reflux episodes on day 2 compared with observation on day 1 in both the patient and control groups (P = 0.049). In patients, comparing DB with sham, total acid exposure on day 2 was not different (10.2 ± 7.9 vs 9.4 ± 6.2, P = 0.804). In patients randomized to DB, esophageal acid exposure in a 2-hour window after the standardized meal on day 1 vs day 2 reduced from 11.8% ±6.4 to 5.2% ± 5.1, P = 0.015. DISCUSSION: In patients with upright GERD, DB reduces the number of postprandial reflux events pressure by increasing the difference between LES and gastric pressure. These data further encourage studying DB as therapy for GERD.
简介:未控制的结果表明,膈式呼吸(DB)对胃食管反流病(GERD)有效,但作用机制和证明的严谨性尚缺乏。本研究旨在确定 DB 对 GERD 患者和对照者的反流、食管下括约肌(LES)和胃压的影响。 方法:对 pH 证实的 GERD 成人患者进行研究。在高分辨率阻抗测压期间,研究患者接受标准化 pH 中性反流性餐食,然后进行 LES 挑战操作(瓦尔萨尔瓦和腹部空心),同时随机接受 DB 或假治疗。之后,患者接受 48 小时 pH 阻抗监测,50%随机在第二天餐后进行 DB。 结果:在检查了 23 名患者和 10 名对照者后,发现餐后胃压在患者中明显高于对照者(12 对 7mmHg,P=0.018)。瓦尔萨尔瓦操作在 65.2%的患者中引起反流,而在 44.4%的对照者中引起反流(P=0.035)。在患者和健康者中,DB 的吸气部分使 LES 增加(42.2 对 23.1mmHg,P<0.001)。餐后 DB 减少了患者(0.36 对 2.60,P<0.001)和健康受试者(0.00 对 1.75,P<0.001)的餐后反流事件次数。与观察相比,在 48 小时动态研究中,DB 在患者和对照组中均减少了第 2 天的反流事件,与第 1 天的观察相比(P=0.049)。在患者中,与假治疗相比,DB 并未改变第 2 天的总酸暴露量(10.2±7.9 对 9.4±6.2,P=0.804)。在接受 DB 治疗的患者中,第一天与第二天相比,标准化餐后 2 小时窗口内的食管酸暴露量从 11.8%±6.4%降至 5.2%±5.1%,P=0.015。 讨论:在直立性 GERD 患者中,DB 通过增加 LES 和胃压之间的差异来减少餐后反流事件的次数和压力。这些数据进一步鼓励将 DB 作为 GERD 的治疗方法进行研究。
Obes Surg. 2009-5
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010-1-27
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012-7-10
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013-7-23
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2025-7-8
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025-6
J Clin Med. 2025-3-3
Front Pharmacol. 2024-7-30
Gastro Hep Adv. 2022-4-5
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024-8
J Public Health Res. 2024-2-17
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024-1-30