• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube 膀胱癌信息质量

Quality of Bladder Cancer Information on YouTube.

机构信息

Department of Urology, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY, USA; Department of Population Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Urology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):56-59. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.014. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.014
PMID:33010986
Abstract

Dissemination of misinformation through social media is a major societal issue. Bladder cancer is the second most common urological cancer in the world, but there are limited data on the quality of bladder cancer information on social networks. Our objective was to characterize the quality of information and presence of misinformation about bladder cancer on YouTube, the most commonly used social media platform. We reviewed the first 150 YouTube videos about "bladder cancer" using two validated instruments for consumer health information and assessed the videos for the presence of misinformation. The videos had a median of 2288 views (range, 14-511 342), but the overall quality of information was moderate to poor in 67%, based on scores of 1-3 out of 5 on the validated DISCERN instrument. A moderate to high amount of misinformation was present in 21% of videos and reached 1 289 314 viewers. Commercial bias was apparent in 17% of videos, which reached 324 287 viewers. From a networking perspective, comments sections in the videos were sometimes used to request medical advice (20%), provide medical advice to others (9%), or give support (19%). In conclusion, YouTube is a widely used source of information and advice about bladder cancer, but much of the content is of poor quality. PATIENT SUMMARY: A large quantity of content about bladder cancer is available on YouTube. Unfortunately, much of the content is of moderate to poor quality and presents a risk of exposure to misinformation.

摘要

社交媒体上的错误信息传播是一个重大的社会问题。膀胱癌是全世界第二常见的泌尿系统癌症,但关于社交网络上膀胱癌信息质量的数据有限。我们的目的是描述 YouTube 上关于膀胱癌信息的质量和错误信息的存在情况,YouTube 是使用最广泛的社交媒体平台之一。我们使用两个经过验证的消费者健康信息工具来审查了前 150 个关于“膀胱癌”的 YouTube 视频,并评估了视频中是否存在错误信息。这些视频的中位数观看次数为 2288 次(范围为 14-511342 次),但根据经过验证的 DISCERN 工具,5 分制中得分为 1-3 分的视频,信息质量总体处于中等至较差水平。21%的视频存在中度至高度错误信息,观看人数达到 1289314 人。17%的视频存在商业偏见,观看人数达到 324287 人。从网络角度来看,视频的评论部分有时被用于请求医疗建议(20%)、向他人提供医疗建议(9%)或提供支持(19%)。总之,YouTube 是一个广泛使用的膀胱癌信息和建议来源,但大部分内容质量较差。患者总结:大量关于膀胱癌的内容可在 YouTube 上获得。不幸的是,大部分内容的质量中等至较差,并存在暴露于错误信息的风险。

相似文献

1
Quality of Bladder Cancer Information on YouTube.YouTube 膀胱癌信息质量
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):56-59. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.014. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
Dissemination of Misinformative and Biased Information about Prostate Cancer on YouTube.YouTube 上有关前列腺癌的错误信息和偏见传播。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):564-567. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.056. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
3
YouTube Videos as a Source of Misinformation on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.YouTube 视频作为特发性肺纤维化错误信息的来源。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 May;16(5):572-579. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201809-644OC.
4
Qualitative Assessment of Medical Information on YouTube: A Multilingual Comparison of Common Urological Conditions.YouTube 上医学信息的定性评估:常见泌尿科疾病的多语种比较。
Urol Int. 2021;105(9-10):757-763. doi: 10.1159/000517292. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
5
Examination of Information and Misinformation about Urinary Tract Infections on TikTok and YouTube.检查 TikTok 和 YouTube 上关于尿路感染的信息和错误信息。
Urology. 2022 Oct;168:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.030. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
6
Characterization of the dissemination of canine cancer misinformation on YouTube.YouTube 上犬类癌症错误信息传播的特征分析。
Vet Comp Oncol. 2024 Sep;22(3):359-366. doi: 10.1111/vco.12977. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
7
Understanding the Social Mechanism of Cancer Misinformation Spread on YouTube and Lessons Learned: Infodemiological Study.理解 YouTube 上癌症错误信息传播的社会机制及相关教训:信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 14;24(11):e39571. doi: 10.2196/39571.
8
Systematic assessment of information about surgical urinary stone treatment on YouTube.YouTube 上关于手术治疗尿路结石信息的系统评估
World J Urol. 2021 Mar;39(3):935-942. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03236-6. Epub 2020 May 28.
9
Misinformation is prevalent in psoriasis-related YouTube videos.与银屑病相关的YouTube视频中普遍存在错误信息。
Dermatol Online J. 2016 Nov 15;22(11):13030/qt7qc9z2m5.
10
Examining understandability, information quality, and presence of misinformation in popular YouTube videos on sleep compared to expert-led videos.比较流行的 YouTube 睡眠科普视频与专家主导的视频,研究其可理解性、信息质量和错误信息存在情况。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2023 May 1;19(5):991-994. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10520.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing critical thinking and decision-making skills for cancer information: the Informed Health Choice-Cancer online learning resource.培养癌症信息的批判性思维和决策技能:明智健康选择 - 癌症在线学习资源。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01874-6.
2
The Quality and Reliability of Online Videos as an Information Source of Public Health Education for Stroke Prevention in Mainland China: Electronic Media-Based Cross-Sectional Study.中国大陆在线视频作为中风预防公共卫生教育信息来源的质量与可靠性:基于电子媒体的横断面研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jul 21;5:e64891. doi: 10.2196/64891.
3
Evolutionary Trend of Dental Health Care Information on Chinese Social Media Platforms During 2018-2022: Retrospective Observational Study.
2018 - 2022年中国社交媒体平台上牙齿保健信息的演变趋势:回顾性观察研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Apr 10;5:e55065. doi: 10.2196/55065.
4
Impact of YouTube® videos on knowledge on tracheal intubation for anesthesiologist trainees: a prospective observational study.YouTube®视频对麻醉学实习医生气管插管知识的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025 Feb 25;5(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s44158-025-00232-3.
5
Analysis of the quality of vulvar cancer-related videos on YouTube.YouTube上外阴癌相关视频的质量分析。
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 31;14(1):102-111. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-1411. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
6
Evaluation of Videos Related to Vaginal Cone Usage on YouTube as an Online Information Source.评估YouTube上与阴道锥使用相关的视频作为在线信息来源的情况。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Dec;35(12):2403-2411. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05932-y. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
7
Cancer misinformation on social media.社交媒体上的癌症错误信息。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Sep-Oct;74(5):453-464. doi: 10.3322/caac.21857. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
8
Mapping automatic social media information disorder. The role of bots and AI in spreading misleading information in society.自动社交媒体信息混乱的映射。机器人和人工智能在社会传播误导性信息中的作用。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0303183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303183. eCollection 2024.
9
Quality assessment of videos on social media platforms related to gestational diabetes mellitus in China: A cross-section study.中国社交媒体平台上与妊娠期糖尿病相关视频的质量评估:一项横断面研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 31;10(7):e29020. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29020. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
10
Contents analysis of thyroid cancer-related information uploaded to YouTube by physicians in Korea: endorsing thyroid cancer screening, potentially leading to overdiagnosis.韩国医生在 YouTube 上上传的甲状腺癌相关信息的内容分析:支持甲状腺癌筛查,可能导致过度诊断。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):942. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18403-2.