Ko Su-Yeon, Choi Hae Won, Jeong E-Deun, Rosa Vinicius, Hwang Yun-Chan, Yu Mi-Kyung, Min Kyung-San
Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea.
Department of Dental Biomaterials Science, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Materials (Basel). 2020 Oct 1;13(19):4389. doi: 10.3390/ma13194389.
The present study aimed to investigate the effects of different obturation techniques on the main and accessory canal filling quality of a premixed calcium silicate endodontic sealer (Endoseal TCS). We also highlighted the validity of the methods used for evaluating the canal filling quality. Thirty single-rooted premolars were used for the main canal filling and 75 were used for accessory canal filling. The canals were instrumented and randomly divided into three groups according to the filling techniques: (1) single-cone technique (SC), (2) single-cone with ultrasonic activation (SU), and (3) warm vertical compaction (WV). Voids in relation to the root canal fillings were assessed using cross-section images from microcomputed tomography (μCT) scans or transversely sectioned tooth specimens ( = 10). After demineralization and clearing of the teeth, the incidence, number, and completeness of the accessory canal fillings were evaluated ( = 25). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test was used for the evaluation of the voids in the main root canal and the incidence and number of filled accessory canals. Pearson's chi-squared (χ) test was used for the evaluation of the filling completeness (α = 0.05). In the stereomicroscopic evaluation of the sectioned specimen, the SC group had significantly higher void occurrence than the other groups ( < 0.05), although there was no difference between groups in the μCT evaluation. However, there was no difference between the SU and WV. There was no difference between all the groups regarding the incidence, number, and completeness of the accessory canal fillings. When the premixed calcium silicate sealer is used with SC, the ultrasonic activation is recommended to obtain a better main canal filling quality. In contrast, the obturation techniques did not affect the accessory canal filling. We also recommend using the sectioning method when the void formation in the root canal filling materials is evaluated.
本研究旨在探讨不同充填技术对预混硅酸钙根管封闭剂(Endoseal TCS)主根管和副根管充填质量的影响。我们还强调了用于评估根管充填质量的方法的有效性。30颗单根前磨牙用于主根管充填,75颗用于副根管充填。根管预备后,根据充填技术随机分为三组:(1)单锥技术(SC),(2)单锥结合超声激活(SU),(3)热垂直加压(WV)。使用显微计算机断层扫描(μCT)扫描的横截面图像或横向切片的牙齿标本(n = 10)评估根管充填中的空隙。牙齿脱矿和清理后,评估副根管充填的发生率、数量和完整性(n = 25)。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验评估主根管中的空隙以及充填副根管的发生率和数量。采用Pearson卡方(χ²)检验评估充填完整性(α = 0.05)。在对切片标本的体视显微镜评估中,SC组的空隙发生率显著高于其他组(P < 0.05),尽管在μCT评估中各组之间没有差异。然而,SU组和WV组之间没有差异。在副根管充填的发生率、数量和完整性方面,所有组之间没有差异。当使用预混硅酸钙封闭剂进行SC充填时,建议进行超声激活以获得更好的主根管充填质量。相比之下,充填技术对副根管充填没有影响。我们还建议在评估根管充填材料中的空隙形成时使用切片法。