Alim Betul Aycan, Garip Berker Yıldız
Department of Endodontics, Bezmialem Vakıf University, Faculty of Dentistry, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Endodontics, Istanbul Kent University, Faculty of Dentistry, Taksim, Istanbul, Turkey.
Saudi Dent J. 2020 May;32(4):200-205. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
To fill the severely curved root canals with different filling techniques and to compare these techniques using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).
Sixty extracted mandibular first molars (degree of root canal curvature >25°) were selected. All samples were divided into four groups and filled with one of the following techniques: lateral condensation, single-cone, continuous-wave obturation, and core carrier. After they were scanned by micro-CT, the total area, filled area and void area of the root canal were calculated. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).
It was shown that significantly more filling material was used in the lateral condensation and core carrier technique groups at 2 and 5 mm than in the single-cone and continuous-wave obturation technique groups (p < 0.05). It was observed no statistically significant difference at 8 mm (p > 0.05).
No technique could completely fill in root canal. Regarding the coronal part, all techniques can be used for more effective filling as long as a good condensation is achieved. The use of a plugger with an optimal size according to the localisation of root canal curvature and the choice of a heat-resistant root canal sealer affects the success of the treatment in the thermoplastic techniques.
采用不同的充填技术对严重弯曲的根管进行充填,并使用显微计算机断层扫描(显微CT)对这些技术进行比较。
选取60颗拔除的下颌第一磨牙(根管弯曲度>25°)。所有样本分为四组,分别采用以下技术之一进行充填:侧方加压充填、单锥充填、连续波热牙胶充填和核载体充填。经显微CT扫描后,计算根管的总面积、充填面积和空隙面积。采用曼-惠特尼U检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验进行统计学分析(p<0.05)。
结果显示,在根管2和5mm处,侧方加压充填和核载体充填技术组使用的充填材料明显多于单锥充填和连续波热牙胶充填技术组(p<0.05)。在8mm处未观察到统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。
没有一种技术能完全充填根管。对于冠部,只要能实现良好的加压,所有技术都可用于更有效的充填。根据根管弯曲部位选择尺寸合适的充填器以及选择耐热的根管封闭剂会影响热塑技术治疗的成功率。