• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统根管封闭剂与新开发的根管封闭剂对根管相关病原体抗菌活性的比较。

Comparison of antimicrobial activity of traditional and new developed root sealers against pathogens related root canal.

作者信息

Shin Joo-Hee, Lee Dong-Yul, Lee Sung-Hoon

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Korea University Medical Center Guro Hospital, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthodontics, Korea University Medical Center Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Dent Sci. 2018 Mar;13(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.10.007. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2017.10.007
PMID:30895095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6388800/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Bacterial infection is closely associated with the failure of endodontic treatment, and use of endodontic sealer with antimicrobial activity and biological compatibility is necessary for the success of root canal treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate and to compare the antibacterial effect of two calcium silicate-based root canal sealers (Endoseal and EndoSequence BC sealer) as recent development sealers and with three conventional root canal sealers (AH Plus, Sealapex, and Tubli-Seal), before or after setting, on , and

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sealers were soaked in phosphate buffered saline to elute its compositions after and before setting, and the elutes were performed the antimicrobial assay. Also, X-ray fluorescence analysis was carried out to compare compositions of two calcium silicate-based sealers.

RESULTS

The conventional root canal sealers have strong antibacterial activity against the Gram-negative bacteria, and . Endoseal sealer showed antibacterial activity against not only the Gram-negative bacteria, but also against the Gram-positive bacteria, . However, Endosequence BC sealer exhibited a weak antibacterial effect on all bacteria in this study. X-ray fluorescence analysis exhibited that Endoseal contained more types and more amount of the oxide compound known to have strong antimicrobial activity such as AlO, FeO, MgO, NaO, NiO, and SO than Endoseqeunce BC.

CONCLUSION

Endoseal, which contains various types of oxide compounds, seems to be a suitable sealer for preventing bacterial infection in both treated and untreated root canals.

摘要

背景/目的:细菌感染与牙髓治疗失败密切相关,使用具有抗菌活性和生物相容性的牙髓封闭剂对于根管治疗的成功至关重要。本研究的目的是调查并比较两种新型硅酸钙基根管封闭剂(Endoseal和EndoSequence BC封闭剂)与三种传统根管封闭剂(AH Plus、Sealapex和Tubli-Seal)在凝固前后对[具体细菌名称未给出]的抗菌效果。

材料与方法

将封闭剂在凝固前后浸泡于磷酸盐缓冲盐水中以洗脱其成分,对洗脱液进行抗菌检测。此外,进行X射线荧光分析以比较两种硅酸钙基封闭剂的成分。

结果

传统根管封闭剂对革兰氏阴性菌[具体细菌名称未给出]具有较强的抗菌活性。Endoseal封闭剂不仅对革兰氏阴性菌有抗菌活性,对革兰氏阳性菌[具体细菌名称未给出]也有抗菌活性。然而,EndoSequence BC封闭剂在本研究中对所有细菌的抗菌效果较弱。X射线荧光分析表明,Endoseal所含已知具有较强抗菌活性的氧化物化合物(如AlO、FeO、MgO、NaO、NiO和SO)的种类和含量均多于Endoseqeunce BC。

结论

含有多种氧化物化合物的Endoseal似乎是预防已治疗和未治疗根管中细菌感染的合适封闭剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33a5/6388800/218db2421974/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33a5/6388800/5c850c1213ab/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33a5/6388800/458489e53bac/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33a5/6388800/218db2421974/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33a5/6388800/5c850c1213ab/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33a5/6388800/458489e53bac/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33a5/6388800/218db2421974/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of antimicrobial activity of traditional and new developed root sealers against pathogens related root canal.传统根管封闭剂与新开发的根管封闭剂对根管相关病原体抗菌活性的比较。
J Dent Sci. 2018 Mar;13(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.10.007. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
2
Biocompatibility and Mineralization Activity of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer in Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.与传统树脂基封闭剂相比,三种硅酸钙基根管封闭剂在人牙髓干细胞中的生物相容性和矿化活性
Materials (Basel). 2019 Aug 5;12(15):2482. doi: 10.3390/ma12152482.
3
Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.牙本质可增强根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2014 Apr;40(4):505-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.042. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
4
Antibacterial activity of different root canal sealers against .不同根管封闭剂对……的抗菌活性
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jun 1;9(6):e743-e748. doi: 10.4317/jced.53753. eCollection 2017 Jun.
5
Cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers in a three-dimensional cell culture model.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂在三维细胞培养模型中的细胞相容性
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1531-1536. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1918-9. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
6
Drug-Silica Coassembled Particles Improve Antimicrobial Properties of Endodontic Sealers.载药二氧化硅组装体改善根管封闭剂的抗菌性能。
J Endod. 2021 May;47(5):793-799. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Antimicrobial efficacy of calcium silicate-based bioceramic sealers against and - An study.硅酸钙基生物陶瓷封闭剂对……和……的抗菌效果——一项……研究 (原文中部分内容缺失,导致翻译不够完整准确)
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jul;27(7):737-742. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_215_24. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
8
Assessment of Root Canal Sealers Loaded with Drug-Silica Coassembled Particles Using an In Vitro Tooth Model.载药-硅共聚组装体的根管封闭剂的体外牙模型评估。
J Endod. 2021 Nov;47(11):1775-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
9
Efficacy of Bioceramic and Calcium Hydroxide-Based Root Canal Sealers against Pathogenic Endodontic Biofilms: An Study.生物陶瓷和氢氧化钙基根管封闭剂对致病性牙髓生物膜的疗效:一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):322-330. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_198_21. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
10
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Root Canal Sealers against Enterococcus faecalis: A Comparative Study.根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌抗菌效果的评估:一项比较研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):680-683.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vitro Antimicrobial Effects of Endoseal MTA and AH Plus Sealers on and Mature Biofilms.Endoseal MTA和AH Plus封闭剂对早期和成熟生物膜的体外抗菌作用
Front Dent. 2025 May 19;22:19. doi: 10.18502/fid.v22i19.18760. eCollection 2025.
2
comparison of bioceramic and silicone-based root canal sealers with different obturation technique.不同充填技术下生物陶瓷和硅基根管封闭剂的比较
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jun;28(6):527-531. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_175_25. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
3
Antibacterial Efficacy of Various Root Canal Sealers Against .

本文引用的文献

1
Antibacterial Activity of MTA Fillapex and AH 26 Root Canal Sealers at Different Time Intervals.MTA Fillapex和AH 26根管封闭剂在不同时间间隔的抗菌活性
Iran Endod J. 2016 Summer;11(3):192-7. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 May 1.
2
In vitro comparison of antibacterial properties of bioceramic-based sealer, resin-based sealer and zinc oxide eugenol based sealer and two mineral trioxide aggregates.基于生物陶瓷的封闭剂、树脂基封闭剂、氧化锌丁香酚基封闭剂与两种矿物三氧化物聚合体抗菌性能的体外比较
Eur J Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(3):366-369. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.184145.
3
Physical properties and biocompatibility of an injectable calcium-silicate-based root canal sealer: in vitro and in vivo study.
各种根管封闭剂对……的抗菌效果
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S269-S271. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_675_25. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
4
In vitro comparison of Enterococcus Faecalis survival in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH plus, endoseal MTA, and cold ceramic sealers.根管治疗后使用AH plus、Endoseal MTA和冷陶瓷封闭剂时粪肠球菌在牙本质小管内存活情况的体外比较
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1488. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05192-8.
5
The effect of AH26, Endoseal and ZOE sealers on Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis.AH26、Endoseal和氧化锌丁香油水门汀封闭剂对白色念珠菌和粪肠球菌的影响。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2024 Oct 23;19:Doc50. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000505. eCollection 2024.
6
Marginal Adaptation of BioRoot RCS, MTA-Fillapex, EpoxySeal, and Sealapex to Radicular Dentin: An In Vitro Study.BioRoot RCS、MTA-Fillapex、EpoxySeal和Sealapex与根管牙本质的边缘适应性:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 12;16(7):e64380. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64380. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Physicochemical properties of AH plus bioceramic sealer, Bio-C Sealer, and ADseal root canal sealer.AH plus 生物陶瓷糊剂、Bio-C 根管封闭剂和 ADseal 根管封闭剂的理化性能。
Head Face Med. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13005-023-00403-z.
8
Evaluation of push-out bond strength, dentinal tubule penetration and adhesive pattern of bio-ceramic and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.评价生物陶瓷和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂的推出强度、牙本质小管渗透和粘结模式。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 13;18(11):e0294076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294076. eCollection 2023.
9
Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Dentinal Tubule Penetration-A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透——体外研究的系统评价
Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 29;16(7):2734. doi: 10.3390/ma16072734.
10
Efficacy of Bioceramic and Calcium Hydroxide-Based Root Canal Sealers against Pathogenic Endodontic Biofilms: An Study.生物陶瓷和氢氧化钙基根管封闭剂对致病性牙髓生物膜的疗效:一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):322-330. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_198_21. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
一种可注射的硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的物理性质和生物相容性:体外和体内研究
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Oct 21;15(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0112-9.
4
Induction of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and genotoxicity by root filling pastes used in primary teeth.乳牙根管充填糊剂诱导的细胞毒性、氧化应激和遗传毒性。
Int Endod J. 2016 Aug;49(8):737-45. doi: 10.1111/iej.12502. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
5
Evaluation of the biocompatibility of resin-based root canal sealers in rat periapical tissue.评价树脂基根管封闭剂在大鼠根尖周组织中的生物相容性。
Dent Mater J. 2013;32(3):413-9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-218.
6
Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study.金属氧化物纳米颗粒对革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的抗菌活性:比较研究。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:6003-9. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S35347. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
7
Microbial Flora of Root Canals of Pulpally-infected Teeth: Enterococcus faecalis a Prevalent Species.牙髓感染牙齿根管的微生物菌群:粪肠球菌是一种常见菌种。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2009 Winter;3(1):24-7. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2009.007. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
8
Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles.纳米颗粒的抗菌特性。
Trends Biotechnol. 2012 Oct;30(10):499-511. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
9
Biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate and three new endodontic cements: An animal study.三氧化矿物凝聚体与三种新型根管充填水门汀的生物相容性:一项动物研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Jan;9(1):54-9. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.92944.
10
Bacterial killing by several root filling materials and methods in an ex vivo infected root canal model.几种根管填充材料和方法在离体感染根管模型中的杀菌效果。
Int Endod J. 2011 Dec;44(12):1102-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01928.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24.