• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does smoking cause lower educational attainment and general cognitive ability? Triangulation of causal evidence using multiple study designs.吸烟是否会导致受教育程度降低和一般认知能力下降?使用多种研究设计的因果证据的三角剖分。
Psychol Med. 2022 Jun;52(8):1578-1586. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003402. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
2
Investigating causality in associations between education and smoking: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.探讨教育与吸烟之间关联的因果关系:两样本孟德尔随机化研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 1;47(4):1131-1140. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy131.
3
Genetic support of a causal relationship between cannabis use and educational attainment: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study of European ancestry.遗传支持大麻使用与教育程度之间存在因果关系:一项基于欧洲血统的双样本孟德尔随机化研究。
Addiction. 2023 Apr;118(4):698-710. doi: 10.1111/add.16090. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
4
Smoking and asthma mediate the protective effect of educational attainment on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk: a mediation Mendelian randomization analysis.吸烟和哮喘介导了受教育程度对慢性阻塞性肺疾病风险的保护作用:一项中介孟德尔随机化分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03658-1.
5
Mendelian randomisation analysis of the effect of educational attainment and cognitive ability on smoking behaviour.孟德尔随机化分析教育程度和认知能力对吸烟行为的影响。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 3;10(1):2949. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10679-y.
6
Educational attainment protects against type 2 diabetes independently of cognitive performance: a Mendelian randomization study.受教育程度可独立于认知表现预防 2 型糖尿病:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Acta Diabetol. 2021 May;58(5):567-574. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01647-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
Association between inflammation and cognition: Triangulation of evidence using a population-based cohort and Mendelian randomization analyses.炎症与认知的关系:基于人群队列的证据三角分析和孟德尔随机化分析。
Brain Behav Immun. 2023 May;110:30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
8
Educational attainment protects against epilepsy independent of cognitive function: A Mendelian randomization study.教育程度可独立于认知功能预防癫痫:一项孟德尔随机研究。
Epilepsia. 2021 Jun;62(6):1362-1368. doi: 10.1111/epi.16894. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
9
[Educational attainment increases the risk of developing allergic rhinitis and (or) eczema: a Mendelian randomization study based on genome-wide association studies in European patients].[教育程度增加患过敏性鼻炎和(或)湿疹的风险:一项基于欧洲患者全基因组关联研究的孟德尔随机化研究]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 6;58(6):791-798. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20230830-00138.
10
Genetic causality between modifiable risk factors and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: Evidence from Mendelian randomization.可改变的风险因素与类风湿性关节炎风险之间的遗传因果关系:来自孟德尔随机化的证据。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2024 Sep;27(9):e15315. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.15315.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening Rigor and Reproducibility in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies of Social Exposures and Brain-Based Health Outcomes.加强社会暴露与基于大脑的健康结果的全表观基因组关联研究中的严谨性和可重复性。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025 Apr 21;12(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s40572-024-00469-0.
2
Reassessing the link between adiposity and head and neck cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.重新评估肥胖与头颈癌之间的联系:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 30:2024.11.21.24317707. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.21.24317707.
3
The causal association between cardiovascular proteins and diabetic nephropathy: a Mendelian randomization study.心血管蛋白与糖尿病肾病之间的因果关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun;57(6):1955-1963. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04380-x. Epub 2025 Jan 26.
4
Ecodevelopmental influences on latent classes of substance use among urban American Indian adolescents.生态发展对美国城市印第安青少年物质使用潜在类别产生的影响。
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2025 Jan 5:1-25. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2024.2446739.
5
Associations between health behaviours, fertility and reproductive outcomes: triangulation of evidence in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa).健康行为、生育力与生殖结局之间的关联:挪威母婴队列研究(MoBa)中证据的三角验证。
BMC Med. 2023 Apr 3;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02831-9.
6
Genetic Risk for Smoking: Disentangling Interplay Between Genes and Socioeconomic Status.遗传因素与吸烟行为:解析基因与社会经济地位的相互作用。
Behav Genet. 2022 Mar;52(2):92-107. doi: 10.1007/s10519-021-10094-4. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
7
Interpreting Mendelian-randomization estimates of the effects of categorical exposures such as disease status and educational attainment.解读孟德尔随机化分析中分类暴露(如疾病状态和教育程度)效应的估计值。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Jun 13;51(3):948-957. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab208.
8
Maternal Cigarette Smoking and Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.母亲吸烟与唇腭裂:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Sep;59(9):1185-1200. doi: 10.1177/10556656211040015. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
9
Using Mendelian randomization analysis to better understand the relationship between mental health and substance use: a systematic review.采用孟德尔随机化分析更好地理解心理健康与物质使用之间的关系:系统综述。
Psychol Med. 2021 Jul;51(10):1593-1624. doi: 10.1017/S003329172100180X. Epub 2021 May 25.
10
Causal inference with observational data: the need for triangulation of evidence.基于观察性数据的因果推断:证据三角法的必要性。
Psychol Med. 2021 Mar;51(4):563-578. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720005127. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Robust research needs many lines of evidence.强有力的研究需要多方面的证据。
Nature. 2018 Jan;553(7689):399-401. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-01023-3.
2
Evidence for causal effects of lifetime smoking on risk for depression and schizophrenia: a Mendelian randomisation study.终生吸烟与抑郁和精神分裂症风险之间因果关系的证据:孟德尔随机研究。
Psychol Med. 2020 Oct;50(14):2435-2443. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002678. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Mendelian randomisation analysis of the effect of educational attainment and cognitive ability on smoking behaviour.孟德尔随机化分析教育程度和认知能力对吸烟行为的影响。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 3;10(1):2949. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10679-y.
4
Association studies of up to 1.2 million individuals yield new insights into the genetic etiology of tobacco and alcohol use.对多达 120 万人的关联研究为烟草和酒精使用的遗传病因学提供了新的见解。
Nat Genet. 2019 Feb;51(2):237-244. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0307-5. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings.多变量孟德尔随机化在单样本和两样本汇总数据设置中的检验。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;48(3):713-727. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy262.
6
The Causal Effects of Education on Health Outcomes in the UK Biobank.英国生物银行中教育对健康结果的因果效应。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Feb;2(2):117-125. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0279-y. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
7
Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals.从一项涉及 110 万人的教育程度全基因组关联研究中发现基因并进行多基因预测。
Nat Genet. 2018 Jul 23;50(8):1112-1121. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3.
8
Investigating causality in associations between education and smoking: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.探讨教育与吸烟之间关联的因果关系:两样本孟德尔随机化研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 1;47(4):1131-1140. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy131.
9
How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis.教育对智力的提升有多大作用?一项元分析。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Aug;29(8):1358-1369. doi: 10.1177/0956797618774253. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome.MR-Base 平台支持在人类表型全范围内进行系统因果推断。
Elife. 2018 May 30;7:e34408. doi: 10.7554/eLife.34408.

吸烟是否会导致受教育程度降低和一般认知能力下降?使用多种研究设计的因果证据的三角剖分。

Does smoking cause lower educational attainment and general cognitive ability? Triangulation of causal evidence using multiple study designs.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2022 Jun;52(8):1578-1586. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003402. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1017/S0033291720003402
PMID:33023701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9226381/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have found associations between smoking and both poorer cognitive ability and lower educational attainment; however, evaluating causality is challenging. We used two complementary methods to explore this.

METHODS

We conducted observational analyses of up to 12 004 participants in a cohort study (Study One) and Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses using summary and cohort data (Study Two). Outcome measures were cognitive ability at age 15 and educational attainment at age 16 (Study One), and educational attainment and fluid intelligence (Study Two).

RESULTS

Study One: heaviness of smoking at age 15 was associated with lower cognitive ability at age 15 and lower educational attainment at age 16. Adjustment for potential confounders partially attenuated findings (e.g. fully adjusted cognitive ability -0.736, 95% CI -1.238 to -0.233, = 0.004; fully adjusted educational attainment -1.254, 95% CI -1.597 to -0.911, < 0.001). Study Two: MR indicated that both smoking initiation and lifetime smoking predict lower educational attainment (e.g. smoking initiation to educational attainment inverse-variance weighted MR -0.197, 95% CI -0.223 to -0.171, = 1.78 × 10). Educational attainment results were robust to sensitivity analyses, while analyses of general cognitive ability were less so.

CONCLUSION

We find some evidence of a causal effect of smoking on lower educational attainment, but not cognitive ability. Triangulation of evidence across observational and MR methods is a strength, but the genetic variants associated with smoking initiation may be pleiotropic, suggesting caution in interpreting these results. The nature of this pleiotropy warrants further study.

摘要

背景

观察性研究发现,吸烟与认知能力下降和受教育程度降低都有关联;然而,评估因果关系具有挑战性。我们使用两种互补的方法来探索这个问题。

方法

我们在一项队列研究(研究一)中对多达 12004 名参与者进行了观察性分析,并使用汇总和队列数据进行了孟德尔随机化(MR)分析(研究二)。研究一的结果测量是 15 岁时的认知能力和 16 岁时的受教育程度,研究二的结果测量是受教育程度和流体智力。

结果

研究一:15 岁时吸烟的严重程度与 15 岁时认知能力较低和 16 岁时受教育程度较低有关。调整潜在混杂因素后,发现结果有所减弱(例如,完全调整后的认知能力 -0.736,95%CI-1.238 至-0.233, = 0.004;完全调整后的受教育程度 -1.254,95%CI-1.597 至-0.911, < 0.001)。研究二:MR 表明,吸烟开始和终生吸烟都预示着受教育程度较低(例如,吸烟开始到受教育程度的逆方差加权 MR -0.197,95%CI-0.223 至-0.171, = 1.78×10)。受教育程度的结果对敏感性分析具有稳健性,而对一般认知能力的分析则不那么稳健。

结论

我们发现一些证据表明吸烟与较低的受教育程度之间存在因果关系,但与认知能力无关。观察性和 MR 方法的证据相互印证是一个优势,但与吸烟开始相关的遗传变异可能存在多效性,这表明在解释这些结果时需要谨慎。这种多效性的性质值得进一步研究。