• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一个极端党派化且充斥着恶性暴力的世界中的风险认知与风险分析。

Risk Perception and Risk Analysis in a Hyperpartisan and Virtuously Violent World.

作者信息

Slovic Paul

机构信息

Decision Research, 1201 Oak St., Suite 200, Eugene, OR, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2020 Nov;40(S1):2231-2239. doi: 10.1111/risa.13606. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13606
PMID:33037665
Abstract

I shall discuss, from a personal perspective, research on risk perception that has created an understanding of the dynamic interplay between an appreciation of risk that resides in us as a feeling and an appreciation of risk that results from analysis. In some circumstances, feelings reflect important social values that deserve to be considered along with traditional analyses of physical and economic risk. In other situations, both feelings and analyses may be shaped by powerful cognitive biases and deep social and partisan prejudices, causing nonrational judgments and decisions. This is of concern if risk analysis is to be applied, as it needs to be, in managing existential threats such as pandemic disease, climate change, or nuclear weapons amidst a divisive political climate.

摘要

我将从个人角度探讨风险认知研究,该研究使我们理解了作为一种感觉存在于我们自身的风险认知与基于分析得出的风险认知之间的动态相互作用。在某些情况下,感觉反映了重要的社会价值观,这些价值观应与对物理和经济风险的传统分析一并加以考虑。在其他情况下,感觉和分析都可能受到强大的认知偏差以及深刻的社会和党派偏见的影响,从而导致非理性的判断和决策。如果要在充满分歧的政治氛围中应用风险分析来应对诸如大流行病、气候变化或核武器等生存威胁,这就令人担忧了。

相似文献

1
Risk Perception and Risk Analysis in a Hyperpartisan and Virtuously Violent World.在一个极端党派化且充斥着恶性暴力的世界中的风险认知与风险分析。
Risk Anal. 2020 Nov;40(S1):2231-2239. doi: 10.1111/risa.13606. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
2
[Preventing violence in schizophrenia with cognitive remediation].[通过认知矫正预防精神分裂症中的暴力行为]
Encephale. 2018 Apr;44(2):158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Virtuous violence from the war room to death row.从作战室到死囚牢房的良性暴力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 25;117(34):20474-20482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001583117. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
4
The Influence of Feelings While Driving Regular Cars on the Perception and Acceptance of Self-Driving Cars.驾驶普通汽车时的情感影响对自动驾驶汽车的感知和接受度的影响。
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):358-374. doi: 10.1111/risa.13267. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
The Affect Heuristic and Risk Perception - Stability Across Elicitation Methods and Individual Cognitive Abilities.情感启发式与风险认知——跨诱导方法和个体认知能力的稳定性
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 12;11:970. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00970. eCollection 2020.
6
Perceiving risk in dangerous situations: risks of violence among mental health inpatients.感知危险情境中的风险:精神科住院患者的暴力风险
J Adv Nurs. 2003 May;42(3):278-87. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02617.x.
7
World population, human disaster, and nuclear holocaust.世界人口、人类灾难与核浩劫。
Bull At Sci. 1973 Sep;29(7):45-50.
8
Violent events on the road: Risk perception of traffic-related and non traffic-related situations.道路暴力事件:与交通相关和非交通相关情境的风险感知。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 May;114:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.028. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
9
On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change.论个人经历、情感与风险认知之间的关系:以气候变化为例。
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2014 Aug;44(5):430-440. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2008. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
10
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.

引用本文的文献

1
Media amplification under the floodlight: Contextualizing 20 years of US risk news.聚光灯下的媒体放大效应:解读美国二十年风险新闻
Risk Anal. 2025 Jul;45(7):1940-1956. doi: 10.1111/risa.17701. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Mental health risk communication and community participation among an Indigenous people in Colombia.哥伦比亚某原住民群体中的心理健康风险沟通与社区参与
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 Jan 13;49:e12. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.12. eCollection 2025.
3
The inverse relation between risks and benefits: The impact of individual differences in information processing style.
风险与收益的反比关系:信息处理风格个体差异的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 9;16(8):e0255569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255569. eCollection 2021.